Get documents about "ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a Summary Info
Document Sample
1
ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.a
Summary Info
Pat Burns, Interim Dean ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
2
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Outline
• ARL
• Types of Analyses
• CSU Peer Institutions’ Profiles
• Analyses using ARL data
▫ Collections & Service
▫ Expenditures
• Summary tables below in this Briefing 4.a
• Detailed graphs in Briefing 4.b
3
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Abbreviations & Definitions
• FTE – Full time equivalent
• Lib – Library
• Students – total student FTE, grad + undergrad
• TT – Tenure track
4
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
ARL
• Member organization of about 110 premier
research libraries
• Over 100 years old
• Maintains a robust and consistent longitudinal
database of Library data
• Research libraries have a relatively unique
mission for collections and preservation
5
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
ARL Data
• Are annual
• Are sometimes missing – shows as zero
• Are not as ‘clean’ as one would like
▫ But, overall, are very good and very consistent
• All ‘people’ are defined in terms of Full-Time
Equivalent (FTE), not ‘heads’
• Normalization is per FTE Tenure Track Faculty
6
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Types of Analyses
• Who – our peer institutions (from Fact Book)
• What
▫ Institutional profiles
▫ Library: collections, expenditures
• How
▫ Absolute – how does our Library compare with
other research libraries in an absolute sense
▫ Normalized– how does our Library compare with
other research libraries in a relative sense
• Why – to inform decision making
7
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
8
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Peers: ARL Rank in 2007 (Latest)
• CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 64 • N. CAROLINA STATE 41
• COLORADO 70 • OHIO STATE 27
• COLORADO STATE 103 • OKLAHOMA STATE 89
• ILLINOIS, URBANA 13 • PURDUE 46
• IOWA STATE 81 • TEXAS A&M 26
• MICHIGAN STATE 40 • WASHINGTON STATE 99
9
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Institutional Profiles
CSU Rank
Institutional Data Absolute Normalized
Total FTE TT Faculty 12 -
PHD Fields 11 3
PHDs Awarded 10 8
FTE Grad Students 11 8
FTE Total Students 11 12
Total Budget 11 7
10
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
FY 2007 Total University Budgets
$4,000,000,000
$3,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$2,500,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$1,500,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$500,000,000
$0
11
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
12
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Collections
CSU Rank
Collections Absolute Normalized
Volumes 12 5
Serials 12 6
ILL Lends 3 1
ILL Borrows 3 1
Queries 6 4
13
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
14
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
FY 2007 ‘Total’ Library Budgets
$45,000,000
$40,000,000
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
15
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
FY 2007 Tot. Lib. Budget/Tot. Inst. Budget
0.030
Rank = 6th CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
0.025
COLORADO
0.020 COLORADO STATE
0.015 ILLINOIS, URBANA
IOWA STATE
0.010
MICHIGAN STATE
0.005
NORTH CAROLINA STATE
0.000 OHIO STATE
OKLAHOMA STATE
PURDUE
TEXAS A&M
WASHINGTON STATE
16
ARL Briefing #4.a 2/5/2009
Library Expenditures
CSU Rank
Lib. Expenditures Absolute Normalized
Books 11 3
Serials 12 5
Total Materials 12 4
Lib. Faculty Salaries 12 5
Lib. Staff Salaries 12 8
Lib. Student Salaries 9 5
Lib. Total Salaries 12 6
Total Lib. Expenses 12 4
Related docs
