Dividend Policy Dividend Policy 05 30 07 Ch 21 Dividend

Document Sample
Dividend Policy Dividend Policy 05 30 07 Ch 21 Dividend Powered By Docstoc
					Dividend Policy

      Ch. 21
Dividend Process
 Declaration Date – Board declares the dividend and it
  becomes a liability of the firm
 Ex-dividend Date
    Occurs two business days before date of record
    If you buy stock on or after this date, you will not
     receive the dividend
    Stock price generally drops by about the amount
     of the dividend
 Date of Record – Holders of record are determined
  and they will receive the dividend payment
 Date of Payment – checks are mailed / electronic
  payment made
Theoretically, stock price should
adjust exactly…
Actual ex-dividend day price behavior
and tax differences
 The stock price around the ex-dividend date actually drops by less than
   the dividend amount to accommodate the tax preferences of investors.

 Certain investors (tax-exempt or very low tax bracket) may be able to
   make excess returns by trading around this date.

 These investors would buy the stock before the ex-dividend day, sell it
   after it goes ex-dividend, collect the dividend making a profit because
   the dividend exceeds the price drop. This is referred to as dividend
   capture or dividend arbitrage.

 Ex-dividend day equality where the marginal investor is indifferent
   between selling the stock before and after the ex-dividend day:
                         PB  PA (1  t0 )
                            D     (1  tcg )
Empirical evidence on dividends
 Dividends tend to lag earnings
    Dividends are changed to reflect long-term shifts in

 Dividends are sticky

 Dividends are less volatile than earnings

 Dividend policy tends to follow the life cycle of the
  firm with mature firms returning more to owners
How does dividend policy affect stock
 Constant growth stock valuation model:

                  P0 

 An increase in dividends increases D1 but also
  decreases g
Three schools of thought on dividends
 If
      (a) there are no tax disadvantages associated with dividends
     (b) companies can issue stock, at no cost, to raise equity,
       whenever needed
     Dividends do not matter, and dividend policy does not
       affect value.
 If dividends have a tax disadvantage,
     Dividends are bad, and increasing dividends will reduce
 If stockholders like dividends, or dividends operate as a signal of
  future prospects,
     Dividends are good, and increasing dividends will
       increase value
Dividends are irrelevant…
 The Miller-Modigliani Hypothesis: Dividends do not affect
 Basis:
    If a firm's investment policy (and hence cash flows) does not
     change, the value of the firm cannot change with dividend
     policy. If we ignore personal taxes, investors have to be
     indifferent to receiving either dividends or capital gains.
 Underlying Assumptions:
    (a) There are no tax differences between dividends and
     capital gains.
    (b) If companies pay too much in cash, they can issue new
     stock, with no flotation costs or signaling consequences, to
     replace this cash.
    (c) If companies pay too little in dividends, they do not use
     the excess cash for bad projects or acquisitions.
Dividends are bad…
 Individuals in upper income tax brackets might prefer
  lower dividend payouts, with the immediate tax
  consequences, in favor of higher capital gains

 Additionally,
    Flotation costs – low payouts can decrease the amount
     of capital that needs to be raised, thereby lowering
     flotation costs

      Dividend restrictions – debt contracts might limit the
       percentage of income that can be paid out as
Dividends are good….not for these
 The bird in the hand fallacy: Dividends are
  better than capital gains because dividends
  are certain and capital gains are not.

 The Excess Cash Argument: The excess
  cash that a firm has in any period should be
  paid out as dividends in that period.
The bird in the hand fallacy
 Argument: Dividends now are more certain
  than capital gains later. Hence dividends are
  more valuable than capital gains.

 Counter: The appropriate comparison should
  be between dividends today and price
  appreciation today.
The excess cash hypothesis
 Argument: The firm has (temporary) excess
  cash on its hands this year, no investment
  projects this year and wants to give the
  money back to stockholders.
 Counter: So why not just repurchase stock?
  If this is a one-time phenomenon, the firm has
  to consider future financing needs.
     Consider the cost of issuing new stock
     If it initiates dividends, it may need to raise
      capital through a stock issue just to pay
      dividends in the future.
Dividends are good….possibly for
these reasons
 The Clientele Effect: There are stockholders who
  like dividends, either because they value the regular
  cash payments or do not face a tax disadvantage. If
  these are the stockholders in your firm, paying more
  in dividends will increase value.
 Dividends as Signals: Dividend changes act as
  signals to financial markets about the future
  sustainable earnings of the firm
 Wealth Transfer: By returning more cash to
  stockholders, there might be a transfer of wealth from
  the bondholders to the stockholders.
A clientele based explanation
 Basis: Investors may form clienteles based upon
  their tax brackets. Investors in high tax brackets may
  invest in stocks which do not pay dividends and those
  in low tax brackets may invest in dividend paying
 Evidence: A study of 914 investors' portfolios was
  carried out to see if their portfolio positions were
  affected by their tax brackets. The study found that
      (a) Older investors were more likely to hold high
       dividend stocks and
      (b) Poorer investors tended to hold high dividend
Dividends as signals
 Dividend increases
    Stock prices increase significantly around dividend
     increase announcements.
    Management is signaling to the market that earnings
     will be sustainable at a higher level thus allowing the
     company to maintain a higher dividend level
 The opposite is true for dividend decreases
 Signals are most effective for smaller firms
 Can you think of a negative implication of dividend
The wealth transfer hypothesis



            t:- -12   -9   -6   -3   0   3   6      9   12   15
       -0.5 15                                                    CAR (Div Up)
         -1                                                       CAR (Div down)


                       Day (0: Announcement date)
Dividend policy summary
 No definite conclusion can be reached about the
  optimal dividend policy

 Investors in aggregate cannot be shown to uniformly
  prefer either high or low dividends

 Individual investors, however, have strong dividend
  preferences and will tend to invest in companies
  whose dividend policies match their preferences

 Regardless of the payout ratio, investors prefer a
  stable, predictable dividend policy

Shared By: