Malls_ sprinklers and smoke is smoke in a shopping mall atrium by housework


									       Malls, sprinklers and smoke : is smoke in a shopping
       mall atrium more of a problem that we bargained for?
       Recent tests have been looking at the concerns

       Lougheed, G.D.; McCartney, C.


A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans :
            Canadian Consulting Engineer, v. 43, no. 3, May 2002, pp. 23-24

   Malls, Sprinklers and Smoke : Is smoke in a shopping maill atrium more of a

 problem that we bargained for? Recent tests have been looking at the concerns

                             G.D. Lougheed and C. McCartney

                              Fire Risk Management Program

                           National Research Council of Canada

       In North America, it has generally been assumed that communicating spaces

connected to an atrium or mall are sprinklered and, as a result, the sprinklers will

effectively limit the size of a fire in the adjoining space. As a result, engineering design

guides for smoke management systems such as NFPA 92B [1] have assumed that the

smoke will have minimal effect in the atrium or mall space. However, the design guides

do allow for smoke management designs in which the smoke is allowed to spill into the

atrium space. With the introduction of performance-based designs for fire protection

systems, there has been increasing need to address the potential effects of the smoke in

the atrium or mall.

       In a recent joint study with the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and

Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), NRC investigated smoke movement from fires in

sprinklered retail spaces linked to a mall [2, 3]. To conduct the study, a large-scale test

facility was set-up to simulate areas of particular concern: a retail outlet on the second

floor of a mall and a section of a pedestrian mall in a shopping centre. Because North

American fire statistics indicate that approximately 90% of retail fires activate four or

fewer sprinklers [4], four sprinklers were used in the retail portion of the test facility. The

mall portion of the test facility included a mechanical smoke exhaust system.
        An initial series of tests were conducted using a propane burner shielded from

the sprinkler water spray to determine the impact of both fire and sprinkler scenarios

typical of retail spaces on smoke movement. In addition, a series of tests were

conducted to simulate retail fire scenarios with the fuel shielded from direct water spray

from the sprinklers. These scenarios were typical of those that occur in retail stores in

malls and included clothing and toys in boxes located in display units (Figure 1), and

stored or displayed bulk goods, such as paper towels (Figure 2).

        The resulting fires had three distinct phases: fire growth and sprinkler activation,

steady fire, and decay. During the fire growth phase, all four sprinklers were typically

activated within 5 minutes and hot smoke flowed into the mall portion of the test facility.

        During the steady phase, hot smoke continued to flow into the mall section of the

test facility (Figure 3). A smoke layer formed in the mall area even though the smoke

exhaust system was in use. For the simulated fire scenarios used, hot smoke flowed

into the mall area for up to 20 minutes depending on the test conditions. The optical

density of the smoke in the upper portion of the simulated mall and its carbon monoxide

concentration both exceeded tenability limits. Any accumulation of this smoke in exit

routes could limit evacuation.

        During the decay phase, the smoke was cooled to near or below ambient

temperature. The cool smoke was mixed throughout the fire compartment (retail portion

of the test facility) and spilled through the opening and descended into lower areas of the

mall portion of the facility (Figure 4).
       A primary objective of the project was to address concerns that smoke cooled by

the sprinklers in retail spaces connected to malls could travel downward, where it could

endanger people evacuating the building. Results from the study, however, indicate

that, during the initial stages (fire growth and steady phases) of a sprinklered retail fire

scenario, the smoke entering the mall area is hot and rises towards the ceiling. A smoke

management system using mechanical exhaust could be used to remove this smoke.

       During the decay phase of the fire scenario, the smoke optical density for the

smoke in the secondary space approached or exceeded tenability limits. The rapid

mixing of smoke throughout the fire compartment in or near the opening into the mall

area during this phase could trap any occupants still in the area. However, the extent of

the smoke zone was limited and occurred after occupants should have evacuated the

fire zone.

1. NFPA 92B, Guide for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria, and Large Areas,

   National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2000.

2. Lougheed, G.D.; McCartney, C.; Taber, B.C., Smoke Movement for Sprinklered

   Fires, ASHRAE Transactions, Volume 106, pp. 605-619, 2000.

3. Lougheed, G.D., McCartney, C., Taber, B.C., Sprinklered Mercantile Fires, ASHRAE

   Transactions, Volume 107, pp. 730-743, 2001.

4. Johnson, P., Shattering the Myths of Fire Protection Engineering, Fire Protection

   Engineering, Issue 1, 1999, pp. 18-27.
Figure 1. Toy display with shielded area.
Figure 2. Bulk display of paper towels.
Figure 3. Hot smoke filling upper portion of simulated mall.
Figure 4. Smoke cooled by sprinklers spilling into simulated mall.

To top