Rick v. West 228 N.Y.S.2d 195 (1962) Rick split up his land and sold off lots with a covenant that they'd only be used for single-family homes. He sold a lot to West who built a home. Unable to sell the remaining lots, Rick attempted to have the area rezoned as an industrial zone. A buyer came forth, but West refused to release the covenant so the deal fell through. Rick then attempted to sell the land to a company trying to build a new hospital, but again, West would not release the covenant. Rick sued in order to get the covenant declared unenforceable. The Trial Court found for West. Rick appealed. o The Trial Court found that there had not been any substantial changes within the neighborhood nor within Rick's unsold lots, so there was no reason to void the covenant. The New York Supreme Court found for West. o The New York Supreme Court acknowledged that the land would be a good location for a hospital, and that a hospital would benefit the community. o However, the Court held that even if there is only one member of a covenant that wants to enforce the covenant, then it is still enforceable and protected by law. o West relied upon the covenant when deciding whether or not to buy the home, so they have a right to continue to rely upon them (equitable estoppel). o The Court found that this is not a matter of equity for the hospital but for the landowner, as despite West's insistence in remaining on the land, they deserve to be protected by the original covenant. Rick unsuccessfully argued that maybe they could just pay damages to West to get out of the covenant, but the Court found that wasn't acceptable. That's similar to the idea in contract law about specific performance. o Typically contract disputes involving land are solved Project Wonderful - Your ad here, right now, for as low as $0 with specific performance. Monetary damages are usually not considered sufficient. Some States do allow monetary damages under certain conditions. o In theory, West would be entitled to the diminished fair market value of her house. So, if it was worth $200k before the hospital was built and only $120k afterwards, she would be entitled to $80k. But is that fair? Rick offered her a lot of money to sell and she didn't. There was probably some sentimental value that is not quantifiable. Plus, what happens if her house's value increases? Does she get $0 in damages? The city had another option. They could have simply used eminent domain and taken the land in question.