Word Document

Estate of Nielson Case Brief

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: mythri k
Stats
views:
57
downloads:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
1/29/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Estate of Nielson 105 Cal. App. 3d 796, 165 Cal. Rptr. 319 (1980) • Nielson executed a valid will. It left everything to his mother, or if she predeceased him, to a variety of charities. • Nielson made a number of changes to how much $$$ went to which charity. He crossed out parts of the will and wrote new distributions in the margins. He initialed each change, then put a signature and new date in the margins. • Nielson's will explicitly omitted provisions for his other relatives. • Nielson died. Nielson's uncle stepped forward and challenged the will. • The uncle would inherit by intestate succession if the will was found to be invalid. • The Probate Court found the will to be valid. • Under California State law, a holographic will must be completely in the handwriting of the testator. • The uncle argued that since the will was now partially handwritten and partially typed, it was not a valid witnessed will nor was it a valid holographic will. • The Appellate Court found that (assuming the handwriting was proven to be Nielson's), that the handwritten sections met the Statutory requirements of a holographic will. • In addition, the handwritten holographic will authorizes an inference of an intent to incorporate by reference those portions of the typewritten will that were not crossed out. • In essence, the handwritten parts and the typewritten parts should be looked at as two separate documents. The handwritten parts represent a valid codicil that refers the reader to the typewritten parts which are a separate memorandum. • "The interlineations, written, signed, and dated by the testator, constitute a holographic codicil and the doctrine of incorporation by reference gave validity to republish the will as modified by the holographic codicil." • The trick was that Nielson used the word "revised" showing intent. • This case took place before the Uniform Probate Code came out eliminating the requirement for a holographic will to be completely in the handwriting in the testator. Project Wonderful -Your ad here, right now, for as low as $0
Related docs
Estate of Nielson Case Brief
Views: 57  |  Downloads: 0
Estate of Collins Case Brief
Views: 84  |  Downloads: 1
Estate of Goick Case Brief
Views: 63  |  Downloads: 0
Estate of Kehler Case Brief
Views: 70  |  Downloads: 0
Estate of Murdock Case Brief
Views: 94  |  Downloads: 1
Estate of Wilson case Brief
Views: 102  |  Downloads: 1
Estate of Woodworth Case Brief
Views: 57  |  Downloads: 0
In re Demaris Estate Case Brief
Views: 49  |  Downloads: 0
In re Estate of Beale Case Brief
Views: 45  |  Downloads: 0
In re Estate of Cooper Case Brief
Views: 95  |  Downloads: 2
In re Estate of Gibbs Case Brief
Views: 90  |  Downloads: 2
In re Estate of Laura Case Brief
Views: 85  |  Downloads: 3
In re Estate of Martineau Case Brief
Views: 72  |  Downloads: 2
In re Estate of Parsons Case Brief
Views: 49  |  Downloads: 0
In re Estate of Russell Case Brief
Views: 80  |  Downloads: 3
In re Estate of Shannon Case Brief
Views: 94  |  Downloads: 2
Other docs by mythri k