Mobile dredging sludge treatment installation at Hourpes (Belgium by stephan2

VIEWS: 278 PAGES: 2

									    Mobile dredging sludge treatment installation at Hourpes (Belgium): example of an
             innovative treatment combining mechanical dewatering and lime

                              Sandra Vandorpe, CARMEUSE Benelux


Dredging sludge in Belgium

Since 2 decennia Belgium, and especially Wallonia, is well behind the curing of its water ways causing
navigation and economical problems.
This situation is partly due to the fact that since 1995, dredging sludge (mixture of mainly clay and silt
and in a lesser proportion of sand and gravels) is considered as a waste which is subject to a specific
waste policy. Previously dredging sludge was simply recovered from the water ways and dumped
along the river banks.
This new dredging sludge policy reviewed in 1999, introduced a classification of the sludge depending
on its origin and on its composition: type A stands for unpolluted or slightly polluted sludge while type
B for the other categories.
Type A sludge can be recycled on site or via “grouping centres” whereas type B sludge is oriented to
pre-treatment centres to re-classify them as type A or are oriented to a “grouping centres” for
treatment and further elimination (ex: cement, landfill sites,…).

The Walloon MET (Ministry Equipment and Transport), which is in charge of the curing estimates that
the current maintenance of the 450km water ways implies the annual evacuation of some 600.000m³
dredging material while the built up sludge from previous years still to be dredged is estimated to
more than 5 million m³.
Whatever type A or B, and whatever the orientation of the sludge, landfill site, specific valorisation, or
treatment, the sludge needs to be dewatered to become “shovable”.

Dewatering techniques

The most common technique that has been used since the beginning is “lagooning”. The technique is
quite easy and is based on natural de-watering by drainage. As the surface needed for this kind of
treatment is important, the exploitation permits are not easy to obtain with NIMBY effects playing an
important role. The more, the technique is time consuming , even if it can be accelerated in some
cases from 12 to 3 months by optimising the drainage properties of the soil.
Interesting to mention is that sludge of type A, treated by “lagooning”, is sometimes further mixed
with lime (a few percent CaO) to be recycled as backfill material.

ENVISAN International (group Jan de Nul specialised in the dredging) developed with CARMEUSE an
innovative alternative treatment using the well-known and simple dewatering technique of the filter-
press.
The technique was optimised for the dewatering of dredging sludge by using fine ground lime with a
specific reactivity for the pre-treatment of the sludge. This technique enabled a decrease of the filter-
press cycles and an increase of the final Dry Solids (DS) content.

Mobile dredging sludge treatment at Hourpes

                                                               The installation was placed on 3
                                                               pontoons on the Haute Sambre (upriver
                                                               from Charleroi). The requirements by the
                                                               MET implied the dredging of 30.000m³
                                                               sludge to bring the draught from 1,8m to
                                                               2,2m. The work had to be realised on a
                                                               period of 200 days, including 50 days of
                                                               building up, preliminary analysis,
                                                               demand of exploitation permit and 150
                                                               days of production at 250m³/day.
The treatment
The 30.000m³ dredging sludge that was dredged on the Haute Sambre was directly treated on the
mobile dewatering installation. The sludge was of type A and could thus be valorised as backfill
material.

The installation worked as followed:
   1. Discharging liquid dredging sludge from the
        barge
   2. Charging of the sludge on the vibrating sieve
   3. Sieving of the sludge at 0/8mm
   4. Elimination of the exogenous material (for
                                                            7. high pressure pumps     8. filter-press
        further recycling or landfill site)
   5. Pumping of the sludge to the mixing tank
   6. Addition of fine ground quicklime at a ratio 1 to 2% depending of
        sludge quality
   7. Pumping of the lime treated sludge at high pressure (8 bars) to the
        chambers of the filter-press
   8. Pneumatic jacks are used to automatically separate the plates of the
                                                                                      7. water treatment
        filter-press
   9. Dewatering of the sludge from 35% to 70% DS
   10. The filtrate is treated before getting back to river
   11. Filter cakes are stored in barges of 250T and transported further to
        their final destination (backfill material)

The addition of 1-2% lime to the sludge (pp of the DS content of the sludge)
enables to decrease the filter cycles to less than 10 minutes; a complete cycle     8. de-watered sludge at
                                                                                    70% DS
takes about 15 min. The dewatered filter cakes have also a high DS content of
70% which makes them an excellent recycling product.
Tests without lime all showed very poor dewatering results and very long filter cycles, above 30 min.
Nevertheless, the use of lime is an extra cost that has to be taken into account.

The follow-up
This first mobile treatment work was a success. In November last year, after six and a half month of
functioning, about 26.500m³ sludge were dredged and treated for a total of about 2 million euros.
The installation was easily dismantled. The MET will now compare this mechanical dewatering
technique with lagooning aiming to point out the most efficient treatment method.
We are confident that the mechanical dewatering technique using lime has important advantages such
as cost, treatment cycle of the sludge, the mobile aspect of the work and high DS content of the filter
cake that will make it an interesting alternative to lagooning and thus give lime producers some new
future perspectives for lime sales.

								
To top