Docstoc

Summary

Document Sample
Summary Powered By Docstoc
					                      University:            Entry Name:     Final Score:     1        2          3       4       5       6          7          8          Check
Team 1   Anadolu Unuversity                Vecihi                76.00          6.00       4.00   13.00   17.00   25.00       3.00       3.00       5.00     76.00
Team 2   Clarkson University               Knighthawks           73.00          7.00       4.00   14.00   15.00   18.00       4.00       4.00       7.00     73.00
Team 3   The University of Oklahoma        Team OU               90.00         10.00       4.00   13.00   17.00   28.00       5.00       5.00       8.00     90.00
Team 4   San Diego State University        B.A.M!                59.00          9.00       4.00   10.00   10.00   20.00       3.00       3.00       0.00     59.00


            Note: Enter all data on the individual team scoring pages. Data on this sheet will transfer automatically
   University:                Anadolu Unuversity
                 Entry Name: Vecihi
                 Final Score: 76

 6 Executive Summary                                                                                                   Possible      Given
                             Maximum of 2 pages. If exceeded, score as 0 points                                               10       6
                             Summary description of selected design and why it best meets the mission
                             Describe key mission requirements and associated design features
                             Document the performance/capabilities of your system solution
                             Format, completeness, readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             Discussed mission requirements & design in terms of geometry only
                             No discussion of performance & capabilities, either estimated or actual
                             Little information on configuration


 4 Management Summary
                             Describe the organization of the design team                                                       5     4
                             Chart of design personnel and assigments areas
                             Milestone chart showing planned and actual timing of major elements
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             Good team chart & description.
                             Milestone chart is small, lacks dates, & is hard to read; very top level, could use more detail tasks
                             No assignment for box design
                             Well written and organized

13 Conceptual Design
                             Describes mission requirements (problem statement)                                               15      13
                             Translate mission requirements into design requirements
                             Review solution concepts/configurations considered
                             Describe concept weighting and selection process and results
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             p. 17 assembly; p.19 landing; p.22 takeoff; p. 23 average; p 13 - incomplete sentence & reference "the estimated…(Ref. Britannica)"
                             Table 3.3 should be 3.2; all following tables are mis-numbered
                             p. 18 - Bottom Wing "It is said that…", show data or reference, not word of mouth
                             Problem statement is very complete; Section is complete and readable

17 Preliminary Design
                             Describe design/analysis methodology                                                             20      17
                             Document design/sizing trades
                             Describe/document mission model (capabilities and uncertainties)
                             Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and stability characteristics
                             Provide estimates of the aircraft mission performance
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             analysis & analyses are nouns; analyze and analyzes are verbs
                             At Table 4.2 start mixing decimal notation ', (comma)' & '. (period)'; need to be consistent
                             p. 29 - Identify two airfoils as SD 7042
                             Good review of design

25 Detail Design
                             Document dimensional parameters of final design                                                  15      13
                             Document structural characteristics/capabilities of final design
                             Document systems and sub-systems selection/integration/architecture
                             Document Weight and Balance for final design
                             - Must include Weight & Balance table empty and with each possible payload
                             Document flight performance parameters for final design
                             Document Rated Aircraft Cost
                             Document mission performance for final design
                             Format. Completeness, Readability
                             ----- Drawing package                                                                            15      12
                             3-View drawing with dimensions
                             Structural arrangement drawing
                             Systems layout/location drawing
                             Payload(s) accommodation drawing(s)

                             Judges Comments:
                             p. 38&39 - "stabilizer" not "stabilize"; switched back to use of period for decimal
                             No reference for CG location; no discussion of systems integration; no box design just weight
                             Good documentation of RAC, performance and W&B
                             Dwgs. - all in mm while text uses English units; no batteries, servos or control mechanism on systems

 3 Manufacturing Plan
                             Document the process selected for major component manufacture                                      5     3
                             Manufacturing processes investigated and selection process and results
                             Manufacturing milestones chart: plan and actual
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             Fig. 6.1 - confusing, no clear purpose; Fig. 6.2 mis-numbered & no dates; Table 6.2 - no explanation of rating system
                             No transport box information
                             Not clear what were final manufacturing choices


 3 Testing Plan
                             Test Objectives and schedule                                                                       5     3
                             Test and flight check lists
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             Fig.7.1 - no structural testing; needs dates
                             p. 57 - data on non-conforming prototype flight tests only
                             Checklist for flight test only


 5 Performance Results
                             Describe the demonstrated performance of key subsystems                                          10      5
                             Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                             Describe the demonstrated performance of your complete aircraft solution
                             Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             General statements on aircraft performance; better information on systems
                             No comparisons to Table 5.11; limited discussion of planned changes
                             Documentation of non-conforming prototype flights in S. 7, nothing here for performance.
   University:                Clarkson University
                 Entry Name: Knighthawks
                 Final Score: 73

 7 Executive Summary                                                                                                 Possible     Given
                              Maximum of 2 pages. If exceeded, score as 0 points                                            10      7
                              Summary description of selected design and why it best meets the mission
                              Describe key mission requirements and associated design features
                              Document the performance/capabilities of your system solution
                              Format, completeness, readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              3 grammatical errors on one page - 'known' not 'knows', 'perform' not 'performed', 'of' a flying wing?
                              Chose to design to surveillance mission only & supply performance for that mission; seems shortsighted
                              No discussion of other missions or effects on design choice
                              Clear and readable

 4 Management Summary
                              Describe the organization of the design team                                                    5     4
                              Chart of design personnel and assigments areas
                              Milestone chart showing planned and actual timing of major elements
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              Good team chart and description
                              Milestone chart is very high level. Should show more detail tasks.
                              Box design assigned to team
                              Well written and complete

14 Conceptual Design
                              Describes mission requirements (problem statement)                                             15     14
                              Translate mission requirements into design requirements
                              Review solution concepts/configurations considered
                              Describe concept weighting and selection process and results
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              Tables/Figures & Captions often separated; Two Figs. 11 (p. 15 & 17) all figures in report are wrong from this point on
                              Maximum points for Store Release Mission are 100, not 75
                              Design Req. with respect to mission analysis & Sect. 3.3.6 are well done
                              Very clear and complete

15 Preliminary Design
                              Describe design/analysis methodology                                                           20     15
                              Document design/sizing trades
                              Describe/document mission model (capabilities and uncertainties)
                              Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and stability characteristics
                              Provide estimates of the aircraft mission performance
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              p. 20 missing Fig numbers in text; p. 22 Reference 6 is not in list of references
                              Clear definition of CG referenced to MAC
                              Only performance data is for stability; what is here is well documented
                              Clear and complete

18 Detail Design
                              Document dimensional parameters of final design                                                15     8
                              Document structural characteristics/capabilities of final design
                              Document systems and sub-systems selection/integration/architecture
                              Document Weight and Balance for final design
                              - Must include Weight & Balance table empty and with each possible payload
                              Document flight performance parameters for final design
                              Document Rated Aircraft Cost
                              Document mission performance for final design
                              Format. Completeness, Readability
                              ----- Drawing package                                                                          15     10
                              3-View drawing with dimensions
                              Structural arrangement drawing
                              Systems layout/location drawing
                              Payload(s) accommodation drawing(s)

                              Judges Comments:
                              No dimension data; no box design, only weight; all figure numbers are wrong
                              Lateral CG & W&B only; very little documentation of flight and mission performance, stability data is not sufficient
                              Numerous grammer, spelling and format errors
                              Dwgs. - geometry on 3 view only; no batteries, servos or control mechanism on systems; Structures - #18 "Floor" is what?; Payload very good

 4 Manufacturing Plan
                              Document the process selected for major component manufacture                                   5     4
                              Manufacturing processes investigated and selection process and results
                              Manufacturing milestones chart: plan and actual
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              All figures mis-numbered; p. 47 Table and caption on separate pages
                              p.49 - Figure number missing; incomplete sentence "A close up."
                              No box design & mfg.
                              Section is complete & well written

 4 Testing Plan
                              Test Objectives and schedule                                                                    5     4
                              Test and flight check lists
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              p. 53 - "lose all the" not "loss"
                              Tables 14-16 - no testing shown as complete
                              Documented structural tests


 7 Performance Results
                              Describe the demonstrated performance of key subsystems                                        10     7
                              Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                              Describe the demonstrated performance of your complete aircraft solution
                              Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              Only general statements with respect to performance; nothing in S. 5 for comparison
                              How does a non-conforming gear demonstrate capability?
                              Figures mis-numbered
   University:                The University of Oklahoma
                 Entry Name: Team OU
                 Final Score: 90

10 Executive Summary                                                                                                   Possible    Given
                             Maximum of 2 pages. If exceeded, score as 0 points                                               10    10
                             Summary description of selected design and why it best meets the mission
                             Describe key mission requirements and associated design features
                             Document the performance/capabilities of your system solution
                             Format, completeness, readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             p. 2 error in table of contents
                             Well written and complete



 4 Management Summary
                             Describe the organization of the design team                                                     5     4
                             Chart of design personnel and assigments areas
                             Milestone chart showing planned and actual timing of major elements
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             Good team chart, not much detail on responsibilities
                             Project Manager or Program Manager?
                             Good level of detail on milestone chart
                             Well written and complete

13 Conceptual Design
                             Describes mission requirements (problem statement)                                              15     13
                             Translate mission requirements into design requirements
                             Review solution concepts/configurations considered
                             Describe concept weighting and selection process and results
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             "affect" is a verb, "effect" is a noun - consistent misuse of terms
                             Don't understand how "Weight" is determined for each FOM
                             p. 9 - "aircraft's" not "aircrafts"; possessive not plural
                             Configuration analysis & tables are well done

17 Preliminary Design
                             Describe design/analysis methodology                                                            20     17
                             Document design/sizing trades
                             Describe/document mission model (capabilities and uncertainties)
                             Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and stability characteristics
                             Provide estimates of the aircraft mission performance
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             References not used in numerical order
                             p. 22 - references a nonexistent Figure 4.7
                             Sect. 4.6.4 - poorly written, hard to tell what was done - analysis, test, mockup?
                             Motor IDs between Table 4.9 & 4.10 are inconsistent & confusing

28 Detail Design
                             Document dimensional parameters of final design                                                 15     13
                             Document structural characteristics/capabilities of final design
                             Document systems and sub-systems selection/integration/architecture
                             Document Weight and Balance for final design
                             - Must include Weight & Balance table empty and with each possible payload
                             Document flight performance parameters for final design
                             Document Rated Aircraft Cost
                             Document mission performance for final design
                             Format. Completeness, Readability
                             ----- Drawing package                                                                           15     15
                             3-View drawing with dimensions
                             Structural arrangement drawing
                             Systems layout/location drawing
                             Payload(s) accommodation drawing(s)

                             Judges Comments:
                             Incomplete sentences p. 30/S. 5.4.2 & p.31/S. 5.4.3; no box description
                             Table 5.4 - no units, not clear what is reference point for CG here & in Table 5.5
                             Table 5.7 shows zero wing loading for all missions
                             Overall very complete and well written; Dwgs are excellent, good addition of carrier box

 5 Manufacturing Plan
                             Document the process selected for major component manufacture                                    5     5
                             Manufacturing processes investigated and selection process and results
                             Manufacturing milestones chart: plan and actual
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             p. 46 - Fig. 6.3 in text, Fig. 6.2 in caption
                             Documentation of box design & mfg.
                             Well done


 5 Testing Plan
                             Test Objectives and schedule                                                                     5     5
                             Test and flight check lists
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             p. 49 - "Affect" not "Effect"
                             Good checklists
                             Well written and complete


 8 Performance Results
                             Describe the demonstrated performance of key subsystems                                         10     8
                             Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                             Describe the demonstrated performance of your complete aircraft solution
                             Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                             Format. Completeness, Readability

                             Judges Comments:
                             Partial comparison to Table 5.7 performance
                             Good problem solving & explanation of differences
                             Sometimes difficult to tell what flights were with scaled aircraft and which with prototype
   University:                San Diego State University
                 Entry Name: B.A.M!
                 Final Score: 59

 9 Executive Summary                                                                                                      Possible     Given
                              Maximum of 2 pages. If exceeded, score as 0 points                                                 10      9
                              Summary description of selected design and why it best meets the mission
                              Describe key mission requirements and associated design features
                              Document the performance/capabilities of your system solution
                              Format, completeness, readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              Discussed handling performance only; no other performance data, either estimated or actual
                              Addressed box design issues - Very good!
                              p. 4 - no definition of term AV on first use
                              Overall, well written and complete

 4 Management Summary
                              Describe the organization of the design team                                                         5    4
                              Chart of design personnel and assigments areas
                              Milestone chart showing planned and actual timing of major elements
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              No figure number on schedule (Fig 2-2); chart appears cropped; needs dates
                              Sect 2.1.4 - "weight reduction of stores & payload"; how, these are standard parts?
                              p. 5 Misuse of plural instead of possessive, 'project's' not 'projects'
                              Good team chart and description. Overall, well written and complete

10 Conceptual Design
                              Describes mission requirements (problem statement)                                                  15    10
                              Translate mission requirements into design requirements
                              Review solution concepts/configurations considered
                              Describe concept weighting and selection process and results
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              p. 12 & 13 - Incomplete sentences; Sect. 3.3.4 & 3.3.6
                              No documentation of concept weighting; listed pros & cons and then stated choice as a fait accompli
                              Clear and well organized


10 Preliminary Design
                              Describe design/analysis methodology                                                                20    10
                              Document design/sizing trades
                              Describe/document mission model (capabilities and uncertainties)
                              Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and stability characteristics
                              Provide estimates of the aircraft mission performance
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              p. 15 & 16 - "descent" not "decent"; p. 17 "foot" not "boot"; p. 20 "due" not "do" & "flat" not "plat"
                              Airfoil selection only analysis documented
                              Mission model discussion limited to reiteration of mission profiles
                              No discussion of performance, capabilities or uncertainties

20 Detail Design
                              Document dimensional parameters of final design                                                     15    10
                              Document structural characteristics/capabilities of final design
                              Document systems and sub-systems selection/integration/architecture
                              Document Weight and Balance for final design
                              - Must include Weight & Balance table empty and with each possible payload
                              Document flight performance parameters for final design
                              Document Rated Aircraft Cost
                              Document mission performance for final design
                              Format. Completeness, Readability
                              ----- Drawing package                                                                               15    10
                              3-View drawing with dimensions
                              Structural arrangement drawing
                              Systems layout/location drawing
                              Payload(s) accommodation drawing(s)

                              Judges Comments:
                              Figures & Tables mis-numbered & mixed up together; p. 29 - Data in figure & table doesn't match, ft-lb, in-lb;
                              variable line spacing; p.22 coefficient; p.23 aileron, receiver, empennage;p.28 descent;
                              Flt/Mission performance analysis good; very little data on structures; no box design, only the weight
                              Dwgs. - Fuselage & gear structure only; no center tank on payload; no servos or control actuation on systems

 3 Manufacturing Plan
                              Document the process selected for major component manufacture                                        5    3
                              Manufacturing processes investigated and selection process and results
                              Manufacturing milestones chart: plan and actual
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              p. 38 - "wing" not "wig"; p. 39 - "from" not "form"; p. 44-5 - variable line spacing
                              After Fig. 6-6, all figures are mis-numbered
                              Documented storage box design & mfg.
                              No mfg. schedule or documentation of reviewed processes.

 3 Testing Plan
                              Test Objectives and schedule                                                                         5    3
                              Test and flight check lists
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              Figs. 7-1, 7-4 & 7-5 are Tables: all figures mis-numbered.
                              No test schedule
                              App. A identified as checklist; confusing and hard to tell what is what; contains more than test checks
                              What is here is well written

   Performance Results
                              Describe the demonstrated performance of key subsystems                                             10
                              Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                              Describe the demonstrated performance of your complete aircraft solution
                              Compare to predictions and explain any differences and improvements made
                              Format. Completeness, Readability

                              Judges Comments:
                              Aircraft has not flown
 University:
Entry Name:
Final Score:

  0 Executive Summary




  0 Management Summary




  0 Conceptual Design
0 Preliminary Design




0 Detail Design




0 Manufacturing Plan
0 Testing Plan
                     Enter all data on team pages, do not change this page
        enter school name here
        entry name here
        0

Executive Summary
         Maximum of 2 pages. If exceeded, score as 0 points
         Summary description of selected design and why it best meets the mission
         Describe key mission requirements and associated design features
         Document the performance/capabilities of your system solution
         Format, completeness, readability

        Judges Comments:




Management Summary
       Describe the organization of the design team
       Chart of design personnel and assigments areas
       Milestone chart showing planned and actual timing of major elements
       Format. Completeness, Readability

        Judges Comments:




Conceptual Design
        Describes mission requirements (problem statement)
        Translate mission requirements into design requirements
        Review solution concepts/configurations considered
        Describe concept weighting and selection process and results
        Format. Completeness, Readability

        Judges Comments:
Preliminary Design
         Describe design/analysis methodology
         Document design/sizing trades
         Describe/document mission model (capabilities and uncertainties)
         Provide estimates of the aircraft lift, drag and stability characteristics
         Provide estimates of the aircraft mission performance
         Format. Completeness, Readability

         Judges Comments:




Detail Design
         Document dimensional parameters of final design
         Document structural characteristics/capabilities of final design
         Document systems and sub-systems selection/integration/architecture
         Document Weight and Balance for final design
         - Must include Weight & Balance table empty and with each possible payload
         Document flight performance parameters for final design
         Document Rated Aircraft Cost
         Document mission performance for final design
         Format. Completeness, Readability
         ----- Drawing package
         3-View drawing with dimensions
         Structural arrangement drawing
         Systems layout/location drawing
         Payload(s) accommodation drawing(s)

         Judges Comments:




Manufacturing Plan
        Document the process selected for major component manufacture
        Manufacturing processes investigated and selection process and results
        Manufacturing milestones chart: plan and actual
        Format. Completeness, Readability

         Judges Comments:
Testing Plan
         Test Objectives and schedule
         Test and flight check lists

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:31
posted:3/12/2010
language:Turkish
pages:11