stock option grants by taltal


									 N     E    W     S    &    N    O T       E    S

     NAS Panel                                         [industry] should have its considerations
                                                       taken into account.” For Science, this meant
                                                       going against tradition by publishing Celera’s
                                                                                                         Medical School proposed a simple criterion
                                                                                                         in regard to large databases: If the data are
                                                                                                         central enough that they would normally be
     Tackles Data                                      draft of the human genome in February
                                                       2001 while Celera required those interested
                                                                                                         included in the paper itself, but space consid-
                                                                                                         erations and ease of access require them to

     Sharing                                           in accessing the data to agree to the compa-
                                                       ny’s terms of use or pay it a subscription fee
                                                                                                         be deposited in an independent database,
                                                                                                         they should be just as freely available as if
                                                       (see Bulletin, December 2001). Again, this        they were included in the paper.
             he “cumulative enterprise of science,”    April, Science agreed to special terms of data         The nas panel announced plans to pub-

     T       says Eric S. Lander, director of the
             Massachusetts Institute of Technolo-
     gy’s Whitehead Center for Genome Research,
                                                       access to publish the rice genome.
                                                            Lander said he does not favor such
                                                       allowances. With the complicated relation-
                                                                                                         lish its own proposed standards later this
                                                                                                         year after review by a wide array of biological
                                                                                                         scientists, both academic and industrial.
     depends greatly on data sharing. “We maxi-                                                                             “I’m guardedly optimistic,”
     mize the total social product by promoting
     reuse of knowledge in new forms.”
                                                       In a survey of U.S. geneticists,                                     said Cech, that these “spe-
                                                                                                                            cific recommendations and
          Although few scientists would disagree,      twice as many stated that                                            concrete details of proper
     at least in principle, a study published in                                                                            behavior will provide the
     the Journal of the American Medical Associ-       data sharing was on the decline                                      basis for ongoing debate in
     ation (January 23, 2002) reveals a different                                                                           the community.”
     reality. In a survey of U.S. geneticists, twice   than said it was increasing.                                              Lander urged the panel
     as many stated that data sharing was on the                                                                            to be skeptical of attempts
     decline than said it was increasing. Almost       ships that exist today (consulting agreements,    by journals to change the system by allowing
     half of this polled group reported that at        stock options, direct research support), dis-     publication without data release: “This sys-
     least one of their requests for data or mate-     tinguishing between academic and industry         tem [publication and credit in exchange for
     rials regarding published research had been       scientists is becoming increasingly difficult,    disclosure] has been in place since the
     denied in the preceding three years.              “and it’s only going to get worse,” he says.      British Royal Society instituted it in 1665. If
          This study confirms what already wor-            Participants were able to agree on one        we’re going to change it, we had better be
     ries many scientists in this postgenome era,      guiding principle: If any data or materials are   careful.”                 —Reporting by Jim Kling
     and they see the need for concerted action        integral to the scientific claim of the paper,
     so that the trend does not continue               they should be made freely available. But         » To listen to the meeting’s discussion, visit
     unchecked. In that spirit, the National           what is integral? Marc Kirchner of Harvard
     Academy of Sciences (nas) has set up a
     panel, chaired by hhmi president Thomas
     R. Cech, to develop new standards for the
     sharing of data published in peer-reviewed
                                                       New Grants Support Young
     journals. At a public meeting of the panel
     on February 25 in Washington, D.C., edi-
                                                       Scientists in Central Europe
     tors from Science, Nature and other jour-                ix outstanding young scientists in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland will
     nals joined industry researchers and aca-
     demic investigators to begin hammering
     out this new set of principles.
                                                       S      benefit from a new four-year grant to the European Molecular Biology Organiza-
                                                              tion (embo). The hhmi/embo Scientists Program will provide $500,000 annual-
                                                       ly to help support researchers at the beginning of their careers.
          Participants discussed a range of issues:         The three countries are among those participating in hhmi’s International Research
     Are there circumstances in which published        Scholars Program in the Baltics, central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
     data or materials may not be shared? Who          At present, embo’s Young Investigator Programme supports promising young scientists
     should enforce such requirements? Does par-       in those countries with three-year awards of about 15,000 Euros (or $13,000, at current
     tial withholding of data that support a pub-      exchange rates) annually. The new hhmi/embo program specifically targets young
     lished paper seriously detract from the paper     Czech, Hungarian and Polish researchers, who will receive 30,000 Euros a year (approxi-
     and impede scientific progress? Answers to        mately $26,450) for three years. They’ll be chosen by embo with the assistance of hhmi
     these questions did not come easy.                international research scholars in the three countries, who will also mentor the awardees.
          Among the most contentious issues was             “We hope that the new program, which leverages Institute support of international
     whether corporate scientists should adhere        science by using the existing embo peer-review process, will help develop more first-rate
     to the same principles as academic scientists.    researchers who can go on to become international research scholars,” says Jill Conley,
     There shouldn’t be a double standard, said        hhmi international program director.                                                    H
     Barbara Jasny, an editor at Science, “but         » For more information, see

38   hhmi bulletin | june 2002

To top