Misra_D.C._2009__Barack Obama_s Agenda for E-governance

							           Barack Obama’s Agenda for E-governance:
Open Government is Its Main Plank But What About the Roadblocks?
                                          by
                                  Dr D.C.Misra*




All eyes are on the U.S.President-elect Barack Obama, who will assume the charge of his
office on January 20, 2009. He has also set an ambitious agenda for e-governance.
Obama has already very successfully used information technology (IT) in his presidential
campaign. For example, according to reports, on www.barackobama.com, more than
280,000 people created accounts, users created over 6,500 grassroots volunteer groups
and organized more than 13,000 off-line events using the website and over 15,000 policy
ideas were submitted through the website. The Internet operation was looked after by 95
people. Obama has built a treasure trove of database of more than 10 million supporters.
Since change was the main plank of Obama’s election campaign, the transition site has
also been named after change, set up at http://change.gov/. More is expected from him in
the field of information technology (IT) and e-governance once he enters the White
house.

What then is Obama’s agenda for e-governance? In a nutshell it is Open Government. He,
however, has many items in his agenda but the following ten items appear to be
particularly noteworthy in his agenda for e-governance:

*Independent    E-governance       Consultant,   New        Delhi,    India.    Email:
dc_misra[at]hotmail.com, Tel: 91-11-22452431, Blog: http://egov-india.blogspot.com/.
                                              2




(i)    Transparent and Connected Democracy: The agenda proposes “to integrate
       citizens into the actual business of government” by a number of measures including
       “ Making government data available online in universally accessible formats to
       allow citizens to make use of that data to comment, derive value, and take action in
       their own communities, and “Lifting the veil from secret deals in Washington with
       a web site, a search engine, and other web tools that enable citizens easily to track
       online federal grants, contracts, earmarks, and lobbyist contacts with government
       officials.”

(ii)   Open Government: All available technologies and methods are proposed to be used
       to open up the federal government, “creating a new level of transparency to change
       the way business is conducted in Washington and giving Americans the chance to
       participate in government deliberations and decisionmaking in ways that were not
       possible only a few years ago.” Most modern communications infrastructure will be
       used to realize this vision. The agenda visualizes “opening up the closed practices
       of governance to greater citizen engagement and participation.”

(iii) Federal Chief Technology Officer (CTO): The agenda proposes to “appoint the
      nation’s first Chief Technology Officer (CTO) to ensure that our government and
      all its agencies have the right infrastructure, policies and services for the 21st
      century. The CTO will ensure the safety of our networks and will lead an
      interagency effort, working with chief technology and chief information officers of
      each of the federal agencies, to ensure that they use best-in-class technologies and
      share best practices.”

(iv) Openness of the Internet: Realising the importance of the Internet as “most open
     network in history,” the agenda proposes to maintain the openness of the Internet.
     The agenda “strongly supports the principle of network neutrality to preserve the
     benefits of open competition on the Internet. Users must be free to access content,
     to use applications, and to attach personal devices. They have a right to receive
     accurate and honest information about service plans.” The agenda “supports the
     basic principle that network providers should not be allowed to charge fees to
     privilege the content or applications of some web sites and Internet applications
     over others.”

(v)    Protection of Children: An important item on the agenda is protection of children
       on the Internet. The agenda proposes to “work to give parents the tools to prevent
       reception of programming that they find offensive on television and on digital
       media. Again, it will “encourage improvements to the existing voluntary rating
       system, exploiting new technologies like tagging and filtering, so that parents can
       better understand what content their children will see, and have the tools to
       respond.” The agenda treats a “sanity not censorship” approach of the Common
       Sense Media, a private entity, as a model.
                                             3


(vi) Public Media 2.0: The agenda “will encourage the creation of Public Media 2.0.,
     the next generation of public media that will create the Sesame Street of the Digital
     Age and other video and interactive programming that educates and informs. The
     agenda “will support the transition of existing public broadcasting entities and help
     renew their founding vision in the digital world.”

(vii) Right to Privacy: The agenda notes that “Dramatic increases in computing power,
      decreases in storage costs and huge flows of information that characterize the
      digital age bring enormous benefits, but also create risk of abuse. We need sensible
      safeguards that protect privacy in this dynamic new world.” The agenda, therefore,
      proposes to “strengthen privacy protections for the digital age and will harness the
      power of technology to hold government and business accountable for violations of
      personal privacy.”

(viii) Next Generation Broadband: The agenda realizes the importance of broadband in
       so many words: “Full broadband penetration can enrich democratic discourse,
       enhance competition, provide economic growth, and bring significant consumer
       benefits. Moreover, improving our infrastructure will foster competitive markets for
       Internet access and services that ride on that infrastructure.” This is sought to be
       achieved by (i) redefinition of broadband (currently defined at low 200 kbps), (ii)
       universal service reform, and (iii) public-private partnership.

(ix) Protection of Intellectual Property Rights at Home and Abroad: The agenda
     recognizes the importance of intellectual property rights by stating that “Intellectual
     property is to the digital age what physical goods were to the industrial age” and
     emphasizes the “need to update and reform our copyright and patent systems to
     promote civic discourse, innovation and investment while ensuring that intellectual
     property owners are fairly treated.” The agenda proposes to protect intellectual
     property rights at home and abroad.

(x)   Health Care: The agenda proposes to “invest $10 billion a year over the next five
      years to move the U.S. health care system to broad adoption of standards-based
      electronic health information systems, including electronic health records” and
      “phase in requirements for full implementation of health IT and commit the
      necessary federal resources to make it happen.” It cites a study by the Rand
      Corporation that found if most hospitals and doctors offices adopted electronic
      health records, up to $77 billion of savings would be realized each year through
      improvements such as reduced hospital stays, avoidance of duplicative and
      unnecessary testing, more appropriate drug utilization, and other efficiencies.”

Many of these items are routine, mundane and incremental. Nevertheless three items of
his agenda are striking and deserve close look.

First, Open Government. This will be a very challenging task. The issues here are the
extent to which government will open up consistent with the requirements of security and
protection of privacy of citizens, and making government transparent and accountable.
                                               4


Obama, of course, has taken up the gauntlet when he makes a daring commitment in his
agenda: (he) “will use the most current technological tools available to make government
less beholden to special interest groups and lobbyists.” In a speech in Des Moines, IA
November 10, 2007 Obama had forcefully declared:

       “I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists that their days of setting the agenda in
       Washington are over. I have done more than any other candidate in this race to take on
       lobbyists — and won. They have not funded my campaign…and they will not drown out
       the voices of the American people when I am president.”

Blueprint for Change: Obama and Biden’s Plan for America declares: “Obama and
Biden will close the revolving door between the executive branch and K-Street lobbying
shops. Their appointees will serve the American people, not their own financial
interests.” It will be quite interesting to watch as to how Obama and his team goes about
it as lobbyists are firmly entrenched in Washington, D.C.

Second, Citizen Participation in Government Decision-Making. An integral part of open
government, it is also a very challenging area as despite living in democratic regimes
citizens have no participation in decision-making, a task performed singularly by the
legislators who, once elected, forget about the citizens until the next election. The nearest
governments have gone for citizen participation in government decision-making is to
seek citizen’s views on government’s specific proposals. But this is usually an eye wash
as citizens views may be taken as a mere formality without being taken into account in
decision-making, leave alone having an impact in decision-making.

If citizen participation in government decision-making is going to be meaningful,
citizen’s views must be able to influence decision-making. What would be the modalities
of such citizen participation in government decision-making? Would a citizen in such
circumstances become a tier-2 legislator? And what would be its legal implications.

Third, National Chief Technology Officer (CTO). This has been talked about for quite
some time. It is going to be a very challenging task for the incumbent as co-ordination is
no cakewalk. On the contrary, it is quite problematic as CTO/CIO will protect his turf
and the method of working. Quite often he is immune to external advice. The agenda
proposes to suitably legally empower him. In such a case he will be a Super-CTO or
Super CIO and his authority is likely to be resented by agency CTO/CIO.

Here is, however, wishing Obama and his team all the best in implementing his ambitious
agenda.