PR Final Day Review 30 MC 1 Essay Judges Disqualify v. Recusal A judge may not be involved in a continuing business relationship with another attorney or anyone likely to come up in front of the court. Review Stuff for Final Test for determining if there is a atty client relationship o The reasonable client standard o Keep in mind diligence and competence Know difference b/t different types of sanctions/punishments Confidentiality o Atty/Client, WP, Duty of Confidentiality under the ethical rules A/C, WP during litigation Duty of Confidentiality always o Rule 1.6 FL differences (Know) o When is protection against disclosure is waived Presence of third party and one other o Representing Corp or other org Know when privilege applies to lower level employees COmm concern matters within scope of employees duty and knows that information gathered for corp in litigation Privilege is to corp not individuals o Common Interest Exception to third party disclosure Joint Defense Privlige o Crime/Fraud Exception o Interplay between 1.6 and 1.2(d) 1.6 commenst 7,8 o Distinction b/t crime/fraud past v. current or future o 1.13 o 4.1(b) o FL version of 1.13 When client commits perjury o 3.3 comment 8 o Know means actual knowledge If client wants to lie o 3.3 comments 5-9 o Testimony in the form of narrative o 3.3 comment 10 o 3.3 FL v. Model Rules
o MR stops at conclusion FL continues Remember 1.13 steps know FL version of those Disclosing adverse facts and law o There will be a question about ethics and negotiations o 3.8(d) o 3.3(a)(2) o 3.3(a)(1) o 3.3 comment 3 o 3.3 comment 10 o 3.4(d) o 1.2(d) Presenting analysis v. recommending means by which crime may be conducted Handling Physical Evidence o 3.4(a) o Generally not the subject of atty client privilege Prosecutors o When they leave (1.11) o Crusading Prosecutor (3.6) o Prosecuting without probable cause 3.8(a) 6.2(b) Court Appointment o 6.2 Comment 2 Advertising Questions o 7.1-7.5 o Different from current clients o Know Basic FL Checklist Client Settlement Authority o Client has the authority o 1.3 comment 3 o 1.4 requires to reasonable consult Authority to enter plea in criminal context Conducting negotiations 1.4 comment 5 Prosecutors and plea bargaining o Must be willing to talk and defense must participate o Don’t have to agree Contact with represented v. unrepresented o 4.2 o Comment 7 4.3 remember limits to unrepresented person Conflicts of Interest o Current 1.7 o 1.7(a) o 1.7(b) o Confirmed in writing o Waiver of conflict unless facts surrounding waiver have changed o When cannot you not waive conflict
Conflicts in Criminal Cases o 1.7 comment 16, 23 o Standards are in federal rule of criminal procedure 44(c) o Higher standard for criminal cases o Separate rep required with multiple defendants in capital cases Former Clients o 1.9 o Comment 2 o Comment 3 1.10 (imputed disqualification) see exceptions FEES 1.15 o Don’t worry so much about the factors o When are contingency fees prohibited? o Returning unspent retainer o Know 1.8 generally specifically 1.8(i) o Collection of a Fee (1.6) o Can suspend confidentiality to resolve fee dispute o Liens (retaining v. charging) o Fee Sharing 1.5(e)(2) 1.5(e)(1) Paying a witness o 3.4()() o Cannot be contingent on outcome o 1.15 safekeeping property/funds Safeguarded and separate from lawyer no commingling Fees in dispute Withdrawing from rep o Required v. permissible (1.16) Issues of Law firm management o Profits, naming o 5.1(a)-5.3 o Supervision o 5.4 and 5.7 Multi jurisdictional practice 8.3 duty to report misconduct o Cannon 3(e) 3(f) (5)(a)(1) WONT BE COVERED Bar admissions o 8 factors for fees o Not a whole lot about insurance (maybe atty leaving insurance to rep pl) o Legal Opinions o Verdict that may be tainted contact jury o Lawyer as witness o Duty to see justice done
o Billiable hour requirements/salary o Maybe one question about leaving firm (in context of conflict) o Pro Bono