copyrighting

Document Sample
copyrighting
1





The Complications of Copyrighting Graphic Design



Prepared for Gorgeous Graphic Design, Inc.



By: Billie Joe Armstrong, Vanessa Carlton, and Dave Matthews



July 11, 2005



Executive Summary



With the internet as one of the main sources of media, new problems are rising.

One of these concerns is copyrighting graphic design. Graphic designers plan and

format web layouts, normally for a company. Since designers create these works

from their own creativity, they consider them art. However, there are no laws

against people directly taking these designs in their works. Therefore, several

alternatives are being pursued. Designers can protect their code from copying.

They can send themselves their own designs through the mail to create proof of

authorship. If all else fails, they can make the attempt at legal action despite the

lack of laws.



Introduction: Copyright Issues are Important to Graphic Designers



Copyrighting is an important part of any creative idea. It protects an individual’s

work from being directly copied without permission. This gives the designer

power over what they created. Yet with graphic design, there are no laws

protecting these specific individuals. The definition of what copyrighting protects

is stated by the Australian Copyright Council, “Copyright protects a range of

material, including artistic works, written material, musical works, and films”

(2003). Clearly it is stated that artistic works are included in the definition. Also

stated by the A.C.C. is that:



Copyrighting does not, however, protect ideas, styles or techniques. For

example, the “look and feel” of a newsletter or other publication is not

generally protected by copyright. A person may therefore generally copy

ideas about how a publication might be laid out (2003).



This is why copyrighting this specific idea is a problem. It is hard protect the

designs because they are layouts.





Research Specifically Defines Problem and Seeks Alternatives



This main problem researched is that there are no laws protecting these “layouts”

because it is only an idea; since it is only a “look and feel” it is hard to fit into the

definition of copyrighting. However, due to the unofficial copyright all creative

works hold, just because a work is not copyrighted does not mean that the work is

2





not protected (Creative Public 2001). The viewer will find that design is hard to

fit the definition of copyright so the focus was on the point that works are

copyrighted without being legally copyrighted. Research was done on the ways

people are trying to copyright their works and the alternatives being sought.



Alternative 1: Code Protection



As of now no drastic steps are being taken at this point in time about the issue of

copying web designs, but the designer can still take some measures that can help

protect the design. Some sites do not allow the viewer to copy the site owner’s

code. The code must be purchased. Then, the customer may use the design on

his/her own site as long as proper credit is given (Zoll and Kranz 2001).



Alternative 2: Use of Mail to Assure Authorship



Another approach is for the designers to sketch the design and mail it to

themselves. If they do not open the letter, it preserves the date of creation. It can

be used as pieces of evidence and it also creates a tangible form of the site, which

means it becomes copyrightable (Oppedahl and Larson 2006).



Alternate 3: Legal Avenues



The designer can attempt to take legal measures, as long as he/she can prove that

the violator copied the work. Unfortunately, the state of the law in these matters

is very vague and legal action would most likely be a long, drawn-out process

(Computer Graphics Designer 2005).



Plan of Action



The Internet is a place where it is extraordinarily easy to copy things. Areas

where future research can be beneficial are examining changing copyright laws

and looking into technological advances which would make source code more

secure. Copyrighting needs to be able to change the definition to fit in the styles,

ideas, and techniques of work because often the look and feel of a work is the

most important concept. The Internet also needs to be more secure. A viewer

should not be able to go to their favorite site, right click the page and copy the

code. Though some sites prevent the viewer from right clicking on their pages, it

is still easy to get their code. There needs to be more advanced methods to prevent

people from committing such acts, which are virtually untraceable.

3







Sources:



Australian Copyright Council. (2003, July). Graphic designers.

Retrieved March 2, 2005, from http://www.copyright.org.au



Computer Graphics Designer. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from

http://www.packagingcareers.org/jobs/compgraphics.html



Creative Public. (2001). Do I Need A Copyright? Retrieved March 2, 2005, from

http://www.creativepublic.com/copyright.php



Maxwell, Jill. (2001, March). “Copying Web Design: How Much Is Too Much?”

Inc. Magazine. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from

http://www.inc.com/magazine/20010315/22247.html



Oppedahl and Larson. (2006). Web Law FAQ. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from

http://www.patents.com/weblaw.sht



Zoll and Kranz. (2001). Copyrighting Your Website. Retrieved March 3, 2005,

from http://www.toledolaw.com/CM/Articles/articles14.asp


Share This Document


Related docs
Other docs by legalstuff
a patent search
Views: 115  |  Downloads: 4
will kits
Views: 1201  |  Downloads: 54
copyright forms
Views: 606  |  Downloads: 20
register corporation
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
single member llc
Views: 1567  |  Downloads: 83
own wills
Views: 152  |  Downloads: 6
get divorced
Views: 130  |  Downloads: 0
uncontested divorce in arizona
Views: 182  |  Downloads: 4
divorce san antonio
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
form corp
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!