Is your MultiValue database Resilient Resilient Mark Fuller
Description
Is your MultiValue database Resilient Resilient Mark Fuller
Shared by: fdjerue7eeu
-
Stats
- views:
- 9
- posted:
- 3/7/2010
- language:
- pages:
- 2
Document Sample


Is your MultiValue database
Resilient? Mark Fuller, Northgate Information Solutions
People say that ‘the main asset idle, cost of late billings etc; but
also the non-
(Northgate) stand out from the
plethora of
of any company is its staff’ and
material ‘The non-material damages vendors with
that staff retention is very
damages resilience
important. I don’t for a minute
that are often are often very difficult to features that
disagree, but I would argue that quantify.’
very difficult are second to
another asset, that is also vitally
to quantify. none and
important, is the company’s
Now with the World Wide Web, ensure that they are the market
data. Data in a database
your systems are visible leaders in this field, but all of the
constitutes a substantial
globally and the impact of a vendors offer some degree of
financial investment, and will
system being down is far more resilience, some of which is
often contain commercially or
widespread. Worst still in a ‘free’, so why not implement it?
even socially sensitive
mission critical 24x7 system, it In keeping with the ‘ease of use’
information. What happens if a
could even mean the difference of the database, these tend to
company loses its data? What
between life and death! be easy to administer and give
can be done to address this
you a viable resilient path when
risk? How does a
coupled with the technologies
MultiValue
database fit into the ‘Data in a database above. The capabilities of
constitutes a MultiValue databases, such as
world of disaster
Reality, mean that you can
recovery? These substantial financial operate a 24X7 operation, and
are some of the investment’ indeed this has been the case
questions I hope to
for many years in mission
answer below.
critical organisations.
Addressing the
Can you afford Risk
not to have a Some of the
resilient system? Traditionally, these risks have
been managed by simply
solutions
backing up data to magnetic available
If a company loses its data then tape or other storage media,
the penalties could be and this should still be a vital
part of any disaster recovery Most, if not all of the MultiValue
astronomical and are often vendors provide both
underestimated. Look at some strategy. However, this is no
longer sufficient on its own for Transaction Handling and
of the evidence. Transaction Logging
most organisations as the cost
of restoring data is prohibitive. capabilities; lets take a look at
• ‘Companies that RAID disks and cluster what they do.
aren’t able to resume technology can also help and
operations within 10 are in themselves great Transaction Handling
days of a disaster are technologies, but again, for provides protection around a
not likely to survive’ some organisations, these can series of updates to data files
(source: Strategic no longer be relied upon from an application by grouping
Research Institute, independently, as they only the ‘updates’ together. A
Jan 2002.). protect you from approximately ‘transaction ‘ is a set of related
• ‘Problems with IT cost 30% of failures. Another option database updates that must be
small and medium is to completely outsource the completed indivisibly for the
enterprises (SME’s) hosting of your database to a database to remain consistent.
£100 billion in lost specialised ‘hosting’ company This effectively means that if
turnover each year and pass the risk onto them. one update fails, they all do and
according to the However, for those a ‘roll back’ occurs to ‘remove’
London Business organisations, which wish to updates and bring the files back
School. Computer maintain their own disaster to the state they were in before
crashes are recovery procedures, then a the ‘group’ of updates began.
estimated to cause MultiValue database is a ‘low This can protect you from
losses of £31 million cost’, efficient database, which ‘application crashes’ whereby
each year.’ addresses these needs. some files have been updated
and others haven’t, causing
MultiValue databases have downtime while someone
When an incident occurs it is recovers any inconsistent
been traditionally strong, and
not just the material damages updates that have broken
secure data stores deployable
that need to be taken into business logic
at low cost. Some today, such
account, i.e. loss of earnings
as ‘Reality’ from Northgate
while systems are unavailable,
Information Solutions
cost of human resources sitting
technologies mentioned above
Transaction Logging make MultiValue databases a
enhances the data viable alternative to more
security and resilience of mainstream databases where
a MultiValue database some of this functionality exists,
by recording all changes but at far greater costs.
made by both completed
transactions and discrete
updates. This minimises
the loss of valid updates
to your database in the
event of a failure and
enables these updates to
be replayed rapidly to a
restored database. systems. Users will connect
and run applications on the
Some vendors now also provide primary machine and updates
recoverable filing systems will be seamlessly transferred to
(Rapid Recovery or Journaling the secondary
filing systems). This effectively machine and
records all structural changes to replayed on the
a database. This enables the database in ‘real-
physical integrity of all files to time’. If the
be restored within minutes of primary machine
restarting a database after a fails the
system failure. secondary is
quickly re-
Northgate includes the above configured as the
options at no extra cost and has primary and users
further extended the resilience can then re-
capabilities, which are connect and
discussed below. continue working.
Service is thereby
Shadow Database enhances maintained with minimal
resilience by allowing two interruption.
copies of a database to be
Heartbeat is the
highest level of
resilience offered by
Northgate
Information
Solutions. This builds
on the ‘failsafe’
technology but
automatically detects
primary system
failure. Should the
primary fail, the
secondary is
automatically re-
configured as the
maintained on different disks on primary and users are switched
the same system. The ‘live’ to it. Users are automatically
database records all updates logged on to the top level of
via transaction logging whilst their current application so that
the second or ‘shadow’ they can continue working with
database remains unmounted minimal disruption to service.
and unavailable to users.
At a time convenient to The above features are
individual sites, the ‘shadow’ available on Windows, UNIX
database is mounted and the and Linux platforms.
transaction logs are replayed to
keep the database in step with
the ‘live’ one. Shadow Database
avoids the lengthy processes of In summary
restoring a database enabling
the system to become available Great leaps have been taken by
for use quicker. The ‘failed’ vendors of Multivalue
database can then be databases in the last few years
recovered without impacting on including fully protected
the user community. journaled filing systems,
standby databases and failsafe
Failsafe provides a high level machines which can effectively
of resilience by mirroring look after themselves. All of
databases across separate which, when coupled with the
Related docs
Other docs by fdjerue7eeu
_ Southeast the Peacock Flies Southeast the Peacock Flies 2 Play Complete Collection - 5 sets Peacock Flying
Views: 4 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "