SITE VISIT STRATEGY WORKSHEET - RESULTS
Results Item:
Figure # Results Area Relevant to a Key Process? (“Yes” or “No”) *Level
1 2 3 4
*Trend
*Appro. Comp.
*Appro. Seg.
+/-
Updated Results (“Yes” or “No” and impact)
Point(s) to Verify/Clarify and Relevant SV Findings
(Critical new result found on site?)
*Use updated results if applicable.
1
Level : Describes the current level for the particular results area.
2
Trend: Describes the direction and duration of any sustained trend (three or more points in same direction) in performance. Use + or - to indicate the direction. Appropriate Comparisons: Describes the source of and relative performance for any appropriate comparative data provided (e.g., “Exceeds National Average,” “Approaching Best in Class”). If lack of comparative data has been cited as an OFI, reference the comment, as in “3rd OFI.”
3
Appropriate Segmentation: Used only if lack of appropriate segmentation has been cited as an OFI. The comment is then referenced, as in “2nd OFI.”
4
Expected Results Missing in Application
Consensus OFI # Results Area (Area to Address and Description of Expected Results) Results Available On Site? Evidence That Results Are Utilized? Issues with Levels, Trends, Comparisons, Segmentation Impact on Comments (Brief Summary)