Stakeholder Analysis Worksheet
Stakeholders Stakeholder Priority group Design/ development staff Concerns Possible concerns - Quality of students' learning experience – their perceptions, reactions to content/technology, learning processes engaged in, etc. - Quality of learning outcomes (i.e the effectiveness of the learning innovation) - Learner time on tasks -Usability/suitability of innovation in applicable contexts - Degree of flexibility exploited by students - Extent of integration with other course components - Levels of support for project staff – personnel, resources - Achievement of project's stated goals/aims and objectives - Quality of instructional design in the learning product(s) - Other (list here – see below) - Perceptions of the students' learning experiences - Suitability/effectiveness of the innovation in a particular teaching & learning context - Advantages/disadvantages (costs/benefits) of implementing the innovation – including amount of learning support required; resource demands - Ease of integration with other teaching & learning strategies & activities - Quality of learning outcomes viz-a-viz pre-innovation teaching methods - Effect on student motivation; attitudes; approaches - Other (list here – see below) Priority Time-frame
Teaching staff
Project manager/ steering group
- Resourcing of the project (personnel – incl. time release for staff, facilities, equipment etc) - Project management processes - structures, communications, time/cost over runs etc. - Achievement of stated project goals, aims & objectives (within time & budget) - Meeting of milestones within the project - Adherence to documented plans, methodologies and QA standards - Utility of 'deliverables' - Overall lessons to be learnt (how to improve process, product) - Other (list here – see below) - Level of extra support, maintenance required by the innovation - Integration of the innovation with other services - Other (list here – see below) - Cost effectiveness (costs/benefits); productivity/efficiency - Student access to innovation - Pass rates/performances/educational effectiveness - Completion rates; withdrawal rates - Integration/alignment with school &/or faculty strategic plans - Maintenance of academic standards - Student flow on to other school/faculty offerings ('recruitment') - Generalisability of innovation across school/faculty - Other (list here – see below) - Cost effectiveness/value for money - Uptake of innovation - Congruence with grant application and funding conditions - Other (list here – see below) - Alignment with University strategic plans - Uptake & sustainability of the innovation - Other (list here – see below)
Support staff
Heads of School, Deans of Faculty, T & L Committee
Funding bodies
University Executive
Students
- Needs -Time - Costs - Access/convenience - Usability/ease of use - Flexibility/control over learning - Motivation - Pay-off (in terms of assessment) - Other (list here – see below)
Adapted from Oliver, M. (1999). The ELT Toolkit: http://www.unl.ac.uk/tltc/elt/toolkit.pdf