Case Study Presentation at MWC

Document Sample
Case Study Presentation at MWC
Shared by: mmublog
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
209
posted:
3/3/2010
language:
English
pages:
22
Insights from Southeast Asia: Cambodia’s WING &

Thailand’s True Money



Paul Leishman, GSMA







The MMU programme is funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation









Restricted - Confidential Information

© GSMA 2009

All GSMA meetings are conducted in full compliance with the GSMA’s anti-trust compliance policy

Agenda



Why analyze WING and True Money?



1 Neither story is entirely about money transfer

Insights on challenges and opportunities of launching bank-led and convergence

2 supported deployments



3 Numerous distribution insights, including impact of tiering and categorizing agent

networks, and using scratch cards





Structure of analysis:



1 Who uses the service?

2 What service has been most popular and why?

3 How has each deployment approached distribution?







Confidential 2

WING: Implications of Launching a Bank-Led Offering



Launched in Cambodia in 2008, WING Money today has 80,000

customers. The scheme is operated by ANZ and offers customers the

ability to send and receive money domestically, and buy airtime on four

mobile networks.



Implications of launching a bank-led offering:





1 Need to build a new brand

- 94% understand WING can be used to send money fast

- 89% understand WING can be used to send money for low cost

- 63% understand WING can be used to send money safely



2 Need to build a new distribution network

- 493 WING Cash Express Agents; 1,700 Pilots



3 Need to partner with mobile operators

- Integrated with 4 out of 9 mobile operators

- Access to 2M out of 6.5M connections in Cambodia



Confidential 3

Agenda



1 Who uses the service?



2 What service has been most popular and why?



3 How has each deployment approached distribution?









Confidential 4

WING: Reaching the Unbanked at Base of Pyramid





1 WING’s early adopters have been the 2 Roughly a quarter of WING’s

unbanked segment, some of whom customers live on less than US$5

see the potential to use the service per day; higher proportions of low

for savings income early adopters come from

rural areas

% of WING Customers Previously Unbanked WING Customer Income

90% 81% 79% 100%

80% 90% 15%

23%

70% 61%

56% 80%

60% 46%

44% 70% 56%

50% 35%

40% 60% 39%

30% 50% $5000+

20% 40% 31% 13% $2000-$5000

10% 30%

0% 50% < $2000

20% 38%

Total Base Phom Penh Kampong Siem Reap Kompong Som

31%

10% 22%

Cham

0%

Phom Penh Kampong Siem Reap Kompong

Cham Som









Confidential 5

Agenda



1 Who uses the service?



2 What service has been most popular and why?



3 How has each deployment approached distribution?









Confidential 6

WING: Envisioned for Money Transfer but Adopted for Airtime









Confidential 7

WING: Why Adoption of Money Transfer Has Been Slow



1 Lower density of rural agent network 2 Difficult to foster trust in a new brand

makes urban-rural remittances tricky

Awareness of Brand Promises

Phnom Penh

Kep 100%

Pailin 80%

Sihapoukville

60%

Kandalt

Siem Reap 40%

Stung Treng 6X Avg. 20%

Ratanakiri

Kampong Speu 0%

Pursat I can send and I can send and I can send and

Koh Kong receive money receive money receive money at

Kampong Chhnang fast safely a low cost

Prey Veng

Takeo

Battambang

Banteay Meanchey 3 ‘WING to WING’

Preah Vihear

Svay Rieng

Mondulkiri

Oddar Meanchey

Kampong Thom

Kampot

Kampong Cham

Kratie



Confidential

- 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

8

Population Per Agent

WING: Why Adoption of Airtime Purchase Has Been Higher



Reduction in cost of

1 Operators value the distribution savings 5-7% distributing airtime









2 Operators value the incremental revenue

33% Purchases outside

store hours









70% Purchases at $1 price

point





3 Customers value the convenience









Confidential 9

Agenda



1 Who uses the service?



2 What service has been most popular and why?



3 How has each deployment approached distribution?









Confidential 10

WING: Challenges of Flat Agent Network with Multiple Categories









Tiers: 1 -- Categories: 2 Tiers: 2 -- Categories: 1



Key Challenges:

1 With no oversight, it’s difficult to ensure agents maintain liquidity



2 With no oversight or career path, it’s difficult to retain ‘pilots’



3 Cash In/Out agents miss out on the most lucrative commissions

Confidential 11

WING: Impact of Changes to Distribution Network



2 Creating the ‘team leader’ function

Implementing the master WING

1

Cash Express tier has improved for WING Pilots has improved

agent liquidity by 15% retention by XX%



% of Agents Maintaining Liquidity Minimums

50%

45% 43%



40%

35%

30% 27%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

October 2009 November 2010



% of Agents Maintaining Liquidity Minimums









Confidential 12

WING: Outstanding Distribution Challenges



1 Because WING Cash Express agents do not typically register new customers,

their source of income in the early days is limited in the absence of:

- Rapid customer adoption

- High active rates

- High transactions per user



Actual Scenario: 3%

15%

Earnings breakdown of an agent who does everything

20%







Overview: 21%

Chirn Prom runs a small phone shop and sees the

potential in WING. He has become a master cash

in/out agent, and a team leader to 50 WING Pilots.

41%







Summary: Retainer: Team Leader



- 3% of income from facilitating cash in/out Commissions: Team leader



- 35% of income from ‘leadership’ activities New Customer Registrations

Retainer: Master WING Cash Express

- 62% of income from pilot-related activities

Commissions: Cash In/Out Transactions



Confidential 13

WING: Key Learnings









1 A balanced distribution network is required to facilitate urban-rural money transfer



2 At some point in the development of agent networks, multiple tiers will often make sense





3 If registration is separated from cash in/out for agents, consider impact on agent income









Confidential 14

True Money: Implications of Launching as Converged Provider



Launched in Thailand in 2005, True Money today has 6,000,000

customers. True Money is part of True Group, a converged

communications provider that also offers fixed line, cable TV, internet and

other services. True Money is licensed by BOT to issue e-money, and

their service enables customers to pay bills, send and receive money

domestically, and buy True Move airtime.



Implications of launching from a position of convergence:



Payments becomes a higher priority than money transfer, given the

1

potential benefits of making your service easier to access



2 Convergence-based cross-promotion becomes viable









Confidential 15

Agenda



1 How has each deployment approached distribution?



2 Who uses the service?



3 What service has been most popular and why?









Confidential 16

True Money: Impact of Using Scratch Cards for Distribution







True Money Cash Cards



- Rolled up several single purpose True

cards into one multi-purpose card



- Main source of funds for e-wallet



- Comparatively high cost of ‘cash-in’



Impact of Using Scratch Cards:

1 Rapid path to broad distribution

2 Cannot profitably facilitate money transfer

3 Cannot profitably facilitate many types of bill payments





Confidential 17

True Money: Impact of Introducing True Money Express Agents



Challenge of Using True Money Cash Card: The Benefits of TMX:







Introducing TMX has lowered

1 the cost for True to facilitate

Cost of facilitating cash-in: 5% 1% cash-in and enabled access to

money transfer

Composition



Commissions to dealer network 4.5% NA

Introducing TMX has created

Cost of production & distribution 0.5% NA 2 the distribution and cost

Commission paid for cash-in NA 1% structure needed to access the

bill payment market

*Directional: exact figures withheld









Confidential 18

Agenda



1 How has each deployment approached distribution?



2 Who uses the service?



3 What service has been most popular and why?









Confidential 19

True Money: Why Payments Has Been Most Popular Use



1 Convergence provided a ‘beach-head’ and logical start





2 Thais have more options for money transfer than people in other markets, like Kenya





3 Bill payments is a bigger market, and thus has been a higher priority for True

- 177 million money transfer transactions in 2008

- 720 million bill payment transactions in 2008





4 True have not created a distribution network that facilitates cash-out









Confidential 20

True Money: Key Learnings









1 Leverage other corporate assets for cross promotion where available



2 Scratch cards with high embedded costs preclude bill payments and money transfer









Confidential 21

Questions?



Paul Leishman, GSMA







The MMU programme is funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation









Restricted - Confidential Information

© GSMA 2009

All GSMA meetings are conducted in full compliance with the GSMA’s anti-trust compliance policy


Share This Document


Related docs
Other docs by mmublog
GSMA Mobile Money Exchange
Views: 97  |  Downloads: 2
Managing a MMANetwork NEW
Views: 732  |  Downloads: 106
Mobile Money Definitions_no marks_
Views: 855  |  Downloads: 54
Philippines Case Study v.FINAL
Views: 2897  |  Downloads: 241
Case Study Presentation at MWC
Views: 209  |  Downloads: 20
Reframing_microfinance_2
Views: 415  |  Downloads: 36
Meeting the microsavings challenge
Views: 85  |  Downloads: 4
M-PESA in Kenya and Tanzania
Views: 5836  |  Downloads: 261
AML
Views: 756  |  Downloads: 101
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!