Docstoc

UNITED-NATIONS-ENVIRONMENT-PROGRAMME

Document Sample
UNITED-NATIONS-ENVIRONMENT-PROGRAMME Powered By Docstoc
					                        EVALUATION FORM
                    GLOBAL CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM
Please take a few minutes to give us your views of the 8th Global Civil Society Forum.

I. Background information
1. In which country is your organization based ?

   (ONLY ONE)

2. Which major group is your organization part of?
     1. Farmers
     2. Women
     3. Scientific and technological community
     4. Children and youth
     5. Indigenous peoples and their communities
     6. Workers and trade unions
     7. Business and industry
     8. Local authorities
     9. NGOs
   (ONLY ONE CHOICE)

3. Are you a female or a male ?

   Male or female

I. Meeting sessions
4. How would you rate the opening session?
   (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

5. How would you rate the dialogue with the Executive Director of UNEP?
   (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

6. How would you rate session 1 on selected GC / GMEF topics and draft
   decisions?
   (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

      Global Civil Society Statement (1 to 10)

      Globalisation, ecosystem services and human well-being (1 to 10)

      Water (1 to 10)

      Gender and the environment (1 to 10)

      Chemicals management (1 to 10)



                                                                                         1
7. How would you rate session 2 on the work programme of the Global Steering
   Committee?
   (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

8. How would you rate session 3 on engaging at the 24th GC/GMEF?
   (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

9. How would you rate session 4 on finalizing the message and the strategy for
   GC24/GMEF?
   (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

10. How would you rate session 5 on the way forward to engage major groups in
    the work of UNEP?
    (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

11. How would you rate session 6 on globalization, ecosystem-services and
    human-well being?
    (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

12. How would you rate session 7 with the Bureau of the GC/GMEF
    (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

13. How would you rate the closing session?
    (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)


II. COMMUNICATION
14. How would you rate the CS website?
    (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)

15. How would you rate the overall communication with UNEP ?
    (1 = totally unsatisfactory; 10 = excellent)


III. ORGANIZATION AND LOGISTICS
16. How would you rate the agenda in regard to
          Subjects covered (1 to 10)
          Length of the sessions (1 to 10)

17. How would you rate the participation in regard to
          Regional balance (1 to 10)
          Expertise of the participants (1 to 10)
          Gender balance (1 to 10)
          Major groups balance (1 to 10)


                                                                                 2
18. How did you finance your participation?
         UNEP sponsored
         Self-sponsored
         External support through network,
         Other external support
   (ONLY ONE)

19. How would you rate the air travel arrangements?

   (1 to 10) (ONLY if UNEP sponsored supra)

20. How would you rate the organization of the meeting in general?

   (1 to 10)

IV. COMMENTS

(Max 400 characters)




                                                                     3

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:10
posted:3/3/2010
language:English
pages:3
Description: UNITED-NATIONS-ENVIRONMENT-PROGRAMME