Partnering and Influence
Document Sample


What do we want our schools to look like in 2020?
Tim Byles
Chief Executive, Partnerships for Schools
5 July 2007
Introduction
1. Good afternoon and thank you to the LGA for inviting me to speak
at this important session on education, focusing on what we want
our schools to be like in 2020.
2. This time last year, I attended the conference in my capacity as
Chief Executive of Norfolk County Council. But as we all know, a
year is a very long time in public life but, paradoxically, change is
the one constant of which we can all be sure.
3. On a personal level, although local government blood still courses
through my veins, I am now Chief Executive at Partnerships for
Schools, the government agency tasked with delivering the
government‟s Building Schools for the Future and Academies
programmes.
4. Local Government itself has experienced a year of change too, in
particular in relation to the development of Comprehensive Area
Assessments, elections in a number of authorities and, most
recently, changes in the leadership of the LGA.
5. And of course, in the central government arena, we now have a
new Prime Minister and a new cabinet.
6. And yet amidst all of this change, it is reassuring that education
remains a high priority.
7. The new Prime Minister has spoken explicitly of his passion for
education and its primacy in terms of ensuring that Britain‟s young
people become the beneficiaries of globalisation, not the victims of
protectionist pressures.
8. He has spoken of his vision for a Britain in which there is no cap on
ambition, no ceiling on talent and where the culture of second best
is unacceptable.
9. Together with the wider programme of education reforms, the
investment being delivered through BSF to our entire secondary
schools estate is an energising enabler of such a vision.
10. The opportunity that we have been given then is about creating
environments in which young people feel engaged, develop a sense
of worth and believe in themselves.
11. And, as a consequence of that, they become motivated to unlock
the talent that every single one of them has, to reach for excellence
and reach their full potential.
12. It is a programme that provides teachers with world class learning
environments in which they too feel valued and inspired and so
stretch themselves.
13. And thirdly, it is a programme that roots schools in the centre of
their communities so that they become hubs that help revitalise
whole areas and provide a physical means of joining up local
services.
14. In this sense – and in a very tangible way - Building Schools for the
Future is at its heart about building better futures for all of our young
people, for the teaching profession and for the wider communities
that they serve.
Progress to Date
15. As far as progress is concerned, the picture is a rapidly improving
one. When I first arrived at PfS last November, it was clear that BSF
was running behind the original indicative targets. This is for good
reasons, including over-optimism plus preparedness in and
resourcing in LAs. Happily though, the pace of delivery is now
accelerating. Back in November, just one scheme had reached
financial close. That figure has now increased to eight, with a
further 16 projects in the pipeline, at or around the Preferred Bidder
milestone, and of which we expect seven to reach financial close
over the course of the next six months. Further, around 14 projects
were in difficulty when I arrived at PfS six months ago. This has
now reduced to just two.
16. 48 local authorities are now engaged in BSF, with the latest 10
(along with 5 repeat authorities) joining BSF at the start of this year;
projects in waves 1 – 6 will see almost 1,000 school built and more
than half of England‟s local authorities engaged in the programme,
not including those building one school pathfinders and of course,
Academies.
17. The first new BSF school will open its gates to new pupils in
September this year and thereafter we anticipate around a dozen
new schools opening by spring next year, around 60 by the
following financial year, and then a significant ratcheting up to
around 200 new schools every year after that for the remainder of
the programme.
18. Having talked about what we are trying to achieve, I‟d now like to
share some thoughts on how we deliver that vision – educational
transformation; what it means, what its component parts are and to
explore how we get from where we are now to where we want to be
in 2020 – which is not as distant as it once seemed, now just 13
years away.
Educational Transformation – what does it mean?
19. You are going to hear in a short while from a very impressive
individual who had a clearly defined vision for her own award
winning school in Hadley. A vision which refused to be bound by the
existing accepted concept of what a school should look like and
what should go on in it.
20. Dr Eatough will no doubt give you more detail on the experience at
Hadley Learning Community later in this session so I shan‟t attempt
to steal her thunder.
21. But it is clear to me that there are excellent examples appearing
around the country, where new and inspirational learning
environments are making a very real and tangible difference to the
students, to the teachers and to the wider community.
27. In some respects, it is only when the “wow factor” subsides will we
really know that we have delivered – when it evolves into an
enduring magnetism that attracts and draws generations of young
people in helping them become more motivated, recognise the
talents that they have and to reach for excellence.
28. Through BSF, our aim is to bottle that magnetism. It is our task to
ensure that children across the country have the same impressive
facilities that you find in places like Hadley Learning Community
and Djanogly in Nottingham.
29. As such it is a task of real substance – substance that transcends
the physical buildings themselves, as it is this very magnetism that
encapsulates educational transformation.
Educational transformation – component parts
30. But we need to drill a little deeper than that to help foster a common
understanding of what is meant by “educational transformation”.
31. In relation to BSF it is helpful, I think, for local authorities to consider
this in terms of three specific components:
a. First: what actually goes on within our schools and what
types of practice are desirable (the „what‟);
b. Second: the estate as a whole (the „when‟ and the „where‟);
and finally
c. Third: the buildings themselves (the „how‟).
32. Taking these in order, „what‟ – i.e. practice within schools – takes
you to not only the requirements of the curriculum but also enables
a focus on respect, citizenship, unlocking and nurturing talent and
so on. What sort of skills and behaviours do we want our young
people to emerge with as they enter adulthood?
33. Answering the „what‟ also brings to the fore issues such as testing
when ready, individual learning plans and every learner having a
mentor figure.
34. Then, moving to the „when‟ and the „where‟ – the estate. This brings
you to some very real questions about where we want teaching and
learning to take place. What is the right balance for a learner
between physically being in school and being able to access their
work from home, the library or the local community centre?
35. I was extremely interested to hear of a piece of research carried out
in Kent recently which showed that the peak time for accessing
online learning resources by secondary school students was 2am in
the morning. Now either there are whole swathes of teenagers
suffering from chronic insomnia down in Kent, or more seriously
findings like this suggest there is strong case to be made for
applying the „art of possibility‟ to BSF.
36. The estate side also brings forward the issue of other services
available onsite at school, not only extended services in education,
but re-positioning the school as a wider service provider: a one-
stop-shop for the local community so that local people can access a
whole host of services – including healthcare and community
policing, for example.
37. It is only once you have given considered thought to the „what‟, the
„when‟ and the „where‟ that you should move on to the „how‟ – the
buildings. This may sound a touch counter-intuitive coming from me
as Chief Executive for Partnerships for Schools, but to my mind, it
serves to underscore what I said earlier about BSF not being a
buildings programme. A school is only a school, afterall, by dint of
what goes on inside it.
38. The physical environment does of course play an important role.
Having considered what we want to be happening in our schools,
the buildings must then serve these requirements. Not only that, but
the physical and virtual environment must be designed in such a
way as to maximise flexibility for future development – and this in
itself provides a very real challenge.
39. Together, these three components – practice within our schools;
estate wide strategy; and the buildings themselves – sketch the
outline of educational transformation. But, to build up a more
detailed local picture of what transformation means on the ground, it
is necessary to drill further still.
40. One way of doing this is to use map out what each of the wider
educational reforms and initiatives mean for each of the three
components.
41. So, for example, in terms of practice within schools – the „what‟ –
how does personalised learning manifest itself? As mentioned
earlier, this might mean testing when students are ready.
42. In terms of estate wide thinking – the „when‟ and the „where‟ – what
might this mean for extended services? It might mean, as in Hadley
Learning Community, community use of sports facilities. Or it might
mean wireless access to students in their homes – Wi-Fi that the
community can also use – such as in Djanogly Academy in
Nottingham.
43. And in terms of the buildings themselves – the „how‟ – what might
this mean for the 14 – 19 agenda. It might, for example, mean
establishing and integrating vocational units within the school, such
as the painting and decorating units that Jo Richardson Community
School in Barking have opted for.
44. You‟ll be pleased to hear I don‟t plan to work through each of these,
but in using this model, a matrix begins to emerge, and it is this
matrix which encapsulates educational transformation.
Conclusion
45. Before closing, the last important question to ask is what does
transformation look like and how will we know when we have got
there?
46. I‟ve talked about ways in which to „deconstruct‟ transformation, but
ultimately the test of the sum of these components can only be
found in the engagement of the students and teachers and the
wider benefits reaped by local people.
47. In short, transformation is about ensuring there is no cap on ability,
that talent is not allowed to slumber and that the culture of second
best is smashed and replaced by young people and teachers who
demand the best of both themselves and others.
48. 2020 was for a very long time, one of those dates so far ahead that
it assumed an out-of-reach, futuristic quality. The simple fact is that
2020 is a mere 13 years away now – the blink of an eye that it takes
for today‟s 5-year olds entering Reception year to travel through
school until A‟ levels or the equivalent. It is simply not that far away.
We have around us real examples of innovative and inspirational
schools starting to emerge and I would urge those entering BSF to
learn from these beacons of innovation.
49. And finally, for those of you who are at the moment about to embark
upon BSF, my challenge to you is this: be bold, look beyond the
buildings. Or at least, don‟t start with the buildings. Seize this
opportunity; think more broadly and more innovatively; and apply
the „art of the possibility‟. BSF truly is a once in a lifetime
opportunity to make a real difference to millions of people – to
students; to teachers and to our wider local communities.
50. Let‟s together ensure that we wring out that opportunity and
transform education for generations to come.
51. Thank you.
Get documents about "