Quant Template 1

Reviews
Shared by: mimama
Stats
views:
13
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
11/16/2008
language:
pages:
0
March 2006 Sustainable Housing Consumer Research Report Prepared for the Department for Planning and Infrastructure Executive Summary - Background and Objectives • • Prior to the introduction of mandatory sustainable housing standards, the Department for Planning and Infrastructure sought to evaluate the community perspective regarding the initiative. Research was conducted to quantify levels of support amongst those in the in the housing (newly built homes) market – that is ,those who recently bought a newly built home (owners) and those who are considering buying a newly built home in the near future (buyers). As such, the objectives of the research were to: Determine the key purchase decision factors when buying a newly built house. Understand the importance of sustainable housing to home owners/buyers. Gauge the level of support for the introduction of mandatory sustainable housing standards. Determine the key triggers for support of the mandatory standards. • 2 Executive Summary - Approach •An online survey was conducted by Synovate with home owners/buyers between the 23rd of February and the 9th of March 2006. •Respondents were screened to fit the following criteria: Home owners Have purchased a newly built home in the last 3 years Currently live in that home Are residents of Perth Aged 18 or over Home buyers Considering purchasing a newly built home in the next 3 years Are residents of Perth Aged 18 or over 3 Executive Summary - Approach •A final sample of 583 home owners/buyers was generated, corresponding to an accuracy (error rate) of + 4.1% at the 95% confidence level. Group Home Owners Home Buyers Total Sample Size 191 392 583 Accuracy (error rate at 95% confidence level) 7.1% 4.9% 4.1% •Respondents were also given the opportunity to provide open-ended feedback regarding mandatory sustainable housing standards – these verbatim comments have been captured in a separate document. 4 Executive Summary - Key Findings • Strong support exists amongst consumers for the introduction of mandatory sustainable housing standards. This support is a function of: Concern for the environment and the perceived importance of new houses being environmentally sensitive. The desire for reduced energy and water bills over time. Some expressed that for the initiative to work, government support (such as via incentives and rebates) would also be needed. Support remains strong, even with possible impacts such as: Additional costs to build a new home Having to buy a slightly smaller house Not having a double-brick structure – although the level of support does decrease somewhat for this scenario. • • 5 Executive Summary - Implications • Clearly, strong consumer support exists for the introduction of mandatory sustainable housing standards, with most believing that the benefits outweigh the negatives. The Department may wish to conduct a similar consultative process with suppliers/industry, to obtain the perspective of the other half of the housing market. For example, individual in-depth interviews could be conducted with developers, designers, tradespeople and builders. Industry feedback will further assist the Department in managing the implementation of mandatory housing standards. • 6 Consumer Profile Jan 2006 J00000 Gender and Income Gender Male Owners 41 Buyers Male 38 Female 0 50 59 Female 62 100 0 50 100 Income Nil to $50k $50k to $65k $65k to $80k $80k to $100k $100k to $120k $120k to $140k $140k ot 160k Over $160k 0 5 3 7 11 18 15 18 23 Nil to $50k $50k to $65k $65k to $80k $80k to $100k $100k to $120k $120k to $140k $140k ot 160k Over $160k 4 5 7 0 50 100 12 22 16 19 15 50 100 % of home owners / buyers n=191 8 n=392 Jan 2006 J00000 Age and Household Type Age 18 to 24 years 25 to 34 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 64 years 65 years + 0 2 8 15 23 11 41 Owners 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65+ years 2 13 10 Buyers 27 27 21 50 100 0 50 100 Household Type Young single Young couple Young family Older family Older couple Older single 0 7 12 15 10 26 30 Young single Young couple Young family Older family Older couple Older single 11 13 11 15 20 30 50 100 % of home owners / buyers 0 50 100 n=191 n=392 9 Jan 2006 J00000 Length of Residency Years Lived in WA Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5-10 years 11+ years 0 50 1 6 6 7 80 Owners Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5-10 years 11+ years 1 2 4 6 Buyers 87 100 0 50 100 Years Lived in Current Home First home Second home Third or subsequent home Don't currently own a home 0 50 100 % of home owners / buyers n=191 n=392 40 24 36 First home Second home Third or subsequent home Don't currently own a home 0 27 23 28 22 50 100 10 Jan 2006 J00000 Block Size – Smallest Considered Owners Larger homesite More than 800 sqm 701-800 sqm 5 Buyers 16 9% 4 23% 7 601-700sqm 19 19 Traditional block size 501-600 sqm 25 44% 22 41% Smaller homesite 400-500 sqm Less than 400 sqm 0 28 23 47% 19 36% 13 25 50 0 25 50 n=191 % of home owners / buyers n=392 11 Jan 2006 J00000 Block Size – Home Owners Smallest Considered More than 800 sqm 701-800 sqm 5 Current 8 Larger homesite 9% 4 20% 12 601-700sqm 19 20 Traditional block size 501-600 sqm 25 44% 29 49% Smaller homesite 400-500 sqm Less than 400 sqm 0 28 16 47% 19 31% 15 0 25 50 25 50 % of home owners n=191 12 Jan 2006 J00000 Purchase Decision Q: What are/ were the 4 most important factors in your purchase decision? Owners Price Location Quality of the home House size Block size Aesthetic appeal (style) Access to amenities Garden type/size Access to public transport Energy and water efficiency Building materials used 0 7 7 20 40 60 80 100 19 17 11 28 38 48 59 79 76 Location Price Quality of the home House size Block size Aesthetic appeal (style) Access to amenities Energy and water efficiency Access to public transport Garden type/size Building materials used 0 Buyers 79 76 60 38 33 28 25 21 14 12 11 20 40 60 80 100 % of home owners n=191 % of home buyers n=392 13 Jan 2006 J00000 Purchase Decision Q: How important were the following factors in your purchase decision? Not at all Important Not Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important % Important The size of the house Owners Buyers 3 5 36 6 14 1 13 4 4 2 25 24 23 16 0 31 43 47 60 42 54 48 97 95 91 80 Buying a house of double-brick structure Owners Buyers 38 48 45 49 43 25 50 Buying a house of a particular style and design Owners Buyers 38 27 24 39 75 100 86 72 73 82 Buying a house with an environmentally sensitive design and features 100 n=191 n=392 Owners Buyers 75 50 % of home owners / buyers 14 Support for Sustainable Housing Jan 2006 J00000 Environmental Concern Q: Please indicate (your level of concern)… about the sustainability of our environment and natural resources in WA. Not concerned Concerned Very Concerned % Concerned Not at all Concerned Somewhat Concerned Owners n=191 5 50 45 95 Buyers n=392 2 47 51 98 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 % of home buyers/ owners 16 Jan 2006 J00000 Importance of Sustainable Housing Q: How important or unimportant do you think it is for WA housing to be designed for environmental sustainability – ie, houses to be designed to be energy and water efficient? Not important Not at all Important Not Very Important Important Somewhat Important Very Important % Important Owners n=191 2 1 38 59 97 Buyers n=392 1 2 36 61 97 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 % of home buyers/ owners 17 Support for Mandatory Standards Q: How supportive are you of the government introducing these mandatory sustainable housing standards? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Owners n=191 52% aware of standards 34 20 36 37 93 73 Buyers n=392 44% aware of standards 24 17 38 38 94 76 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 % of home buyers/ owners 18 Support for Mandatory Standards - Owners / By Income level Q: How supportive are you of the government introducing these mandatory sustainable housing standards? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Less than $50,000 (n=35) 36 25 23 43 91 66 $50,001 - $80,000 (n=62) 2 19 35 44 98 79 $80,001 - $120,000 (n=66) 6 18 44 32 94 76 Over $120,000 (n=26) 8 8 19 34 31 84 100 65 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 % of home owners 19 Support for Mandatory Standards - Buyers / By Income level Q: How supportive are you of the government introducing these mandatory sustainable housing standards? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Less than $50,000 (n=85) 2 1 17 29 51 97 80 $50,001 - $80,000 (n=137) 24 17 41 36 94 77 $80,001 - $120,000 (n=106) 33 21 33 40 94 73 Over $120,000 (n=61) 3 10 15 51 21 87 100 72 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 % of home buyers 20 Impact of Cost on Support Q: The introduction of these standards may result in additional costs to build a new house. The cost of being more energy and water efficient would be offset over time. Considering these additional costs in building a new house, how supportive are you of the introduction of these sustainable housing standards? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Owners n=191 5 8 26 38 23 87 61 Buyers n=392 3 8 21 41 27 89 68 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 % of home buyers/ owners 21 Support Amongst Owners Q: How supportive would you be of the introduction of these sustainable housing standards if the associated costs (to make houses more energy and water efficient) would mean that you would have to…? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Pay an extra $2,000 for a new house 6 5 16 26 47 89 79 70 74 59 75 100 73 55 46 47 34 Pay an extra $4,000 for a new house 9 12 24 30 25 Pay an extra $6,000 for a new house Buy a house slightly small in size (eg, 5-8 sqm smaller) Buy a house other than double-brick 100 n=191 10 20 24 30 16 8 18 27 29 18 16 25 25 19 15 75 50 25 0 % of home owners 22 25 50 Support Amongst Buyers Q: How supportive would you be of the introduction of these sustainable housing standards if the associated costs (to make houses more energy and water efficient) would mean that you would have to…? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Pay an extra $2,000 for a new house 4 7 15 21 53 89 80 79 77 66 75 100 74 60 53 54 39 Pay an extra $4,000 for a new house 7 13 20 31 29 Pay an extra $6,000 for a new house Buy a house slightly small in size (eg, 5-8 sqm smaller) Buy a house other than double-brick 100 n=392 8 13 26 33 20 7 16 23 34 20 12 22 27 21 18 75 50 25 0 % of home buyers 23 25 50 Summary Strong support for the introduction of mandatory standards Home Owners Support mandatory sustainable housing standards. Home Buyers 93% 94% Support exists across a range of scenarios Pay an extra $2,000 Pay an extra $4,000 Pay an extra $6,000 Slightly smaller house Not double brick 89% 79% 70% 74% 59% 24 89% 80% 79% 77% 66% Benefits Sought Q: If you were in the situation of buying a new house, what would encourage or motivate you to buy an energy and water efficient house? What benefits or advantages are you looking for? “Hopefully the costs of energy and water would be reduced in the long run” Save money over time “I want to have the potential cost savings demonstrated to me so that I could relate any savings to my monthly budget” “Knowing that we would be helping the environment would be an important factor.” Benefit the environment “The simple fact of the house being water and energy efficient would be ample motivation for me” Government incentive “There should be some kind of rebate” “Considering the high price of housing already I think the government should support this in some way” 25 Support for Subsidies Q: Government subsidies could potentially be given to new home buyers to assist with environmentally sustainable modifications being made to the house. How supportive would you be towards the introduction of sustainable housing standards if it incorporated such subsidies? Don’t support Not at all Supportive Not Very Supportive Support Somewhat Supportive Mostly Supportive Completely Supportive % support % strong support Owners n=191 1 13 2 32 52 97 84 Buyers n=392 23 12 31 51 95 82 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 % of home buyers/ owners 26 Sustainable Housing – Other Comments “I think they are an excellent idea and am supportive of this, but think that the Government must provide support for, and contribute to the costs.” “Why should we have to pay for something that the Government should take care of, when we pay exorbitant taxes.” “This should have been done a long time ago.” Government must provide support, incentives and education for this to work Long overdue “About time! All new homes should be built with sustainability in mind, and especially water wise.” “Go for it!! It’s about time we did something to stop wasting our precious resources.” Just do it!! “Bring it on!! The sooner the better.” 27 Sustainable Housing – Contact Details For more information, contact the Department for Planning and Infrastructure at 441 Murray Street, Perth. Fax (08) 9216 8747 Website: www.dpi.wa.gov.au 28 March 2006 Sustainable Housing - The Consumer Perspective For more information, contact the Department for Planning and Infrastructure at 441 Murray Street, Perth. Fax (08) 9216 8747 Website: www.dpi.wa.gov.au

Related docs
How To Tell If You Might Be A Quant
Views: 428  |  Downloads: 9
Quant_average
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
EZ-Quant 1 1 1 Installation Instructions
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
How to prepare for CAT Quant
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MK MaxKapital Drona The Quant Report
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 1
Locality_ Realism_ and the Quant
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING + QUANT
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
DEMS03 Quant Findings Memo
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
premium docs
Other docs by mimama
Gibbons v. Ogden _1824_ - 2
Views: 133  |  Downloads: 1
Chinese Exclusion Act _1882_ - 2
Views: 139  |  Downloads: 2
KEEPING YOUR WORK PLACE SAFE
Views: 237  |  Downloads: 6
OSHA EMPLOYER RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Views: 413  |  Downloads: 6
National Industrial Recovery Act _1933_ - 2
Views: 94  |  Downloads: 0
Sample Press Release eTapestry
Views: 316  |  Downloads: 1
FORM 240A REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT
Views: 750  |  Downloads: 8
Sample Press Release heartsoft 3
Views: 193  |  Downloads: 0
FORM 5498SA 2007
Views: 227  |  Downloads: 0