EDUCATION MTFS LEA BLOCK 2005/6 -2007/8 Service EDUCATION LEA BLOCK SubTotals 2006-07
PAPER A
LEA
Item 2005-06 1.0 1.1 1.2 2.0 2.1 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.1. 5.2. 5.3. 5.4 5.5 Subsequent Budget Adjustments County Hall Recharges Revised Base Budget (=1+2) Grants and Funding Changes Inflation and Cost Pressures Pay awards Increments-Budget holders expected to absorb increments Other Ependiture Inflation Fees & Charges Inflation Other Income Inflation Opening Base Budget 2004/05 Budget Agreed by County Council - February 2004
Sub Totals 2005-06 2005-06 37,737
Item 2006-07
2006-07
Item 2007-08
SubTotals 2007-08
2007-08
Rolled Forward Budget from line 7.4 plus Directorate Bid from line 16.0
Rolled Forward Budget from line 39,887 7.4
41,063
14 37,751 39,887 41,063
528 0 1,033 -145 -32 1,384
Pay awards Increments-Budget holders expected to absorb
increments
570 0 1,000 -150 -40 1,380 41,267
Pay awards Increments-Budget holders expected
to absorb increments
600 0 1,000 -150 -40 1,410 42,473 41,063
Other Ependiture Inflation Fees & Charges Inflation Other Income Inflation
Other Ependiture Inflation Fees & Charges Inflation Other Income Inflation
6.0 7.0 7.1
7.2 7.3
INFLATED BASE BUDGET Target Service Budget Revised Base Budget (=3.0) FSS CHANGE 3.5% provisional increase rather than anticipated 4.0% increase:furthermore involved 3.1% increase for LEA (£1134K) & 7.7% increase for youth (£313K) .This increases the gap between EFSS & spend on Youth Minus contribution to central services -3.5% ( includes £273K re schools) Target Service Budget BALANCE or SHORTFALL (=6 - 7)
39,135 37,751 Revised Base Budget (=3.0)
39,887 Revised Base Budget (=3.0)
FSS Allocation- Assumption of 3.5% as 1,448 per 2005/6 Minus contribution to central services 314 3.5% ( includes £282K re schools) 38,885 250
FSS Allocation- Assumption of 1,500 3.5% as per 2005/6 Minus contribution to central 324 services -3.5% ( includes £292K re schools) 41,063 204
1,550 336
7.4 8.0
42,277 196
Page 1
D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\f42f158d-7882-4fda-8c72-f6da06d84302.xls
EDUCATION MTFS LEA BLOCK 2005/6 -2007/8 Service EDUCATION LEA BLOCK SubTotals 2006-07
PAPER A
LEA
Item 2005-06 9.0 9.1 Market Forces Transport - continued market forces increases above inflation together and ongoing rising demand but projected at significantly reduced levels of increase Volume and Demand County Council Policies and Priorities
Sub Totals 2005-06 2005-06
Item 2006-07
2006-07
Item 2007-08
SubTotals 2007-08
2007-08
600 600
Transport
460 460
Transport
350 350
10.0 11.0
11.1 11.2
Youth Service - extra provision to meet DfES’ standards on Youth Service Transformation which if not made will lead to Secretary of State taking over the service after making a top-slice based upon EFSS, not spending level. Provision of £1.3M may achieve target over MTFS period but further above inflation increases in EFSS wil increase the provision needed.Investment will also make a significant contribution to the achievement of the main Education priorities i.e Standards Inclusion and supporting and protecting the most vulnerable children & 13-19 developments Transport Best Value - phased implementation of the recommendations on the Best Value Review of Transport – Phase 1 budgeted in base but not all currently commited. (see 15.3 below )Phase 2 requires a policy review from Sept 2005( no capacity to do it before then ) £20K non recurring .Provision for 14-19 policy developments to transport students to meet their personal learning needs.
LEA STRATEGIC CAPACITY Corporate issues
500
Youth Service revised figures following recalculation of spend v EFSS. & assumption of less than planned provision in 2005/6 (see 15.5)
500
Youth Service period to achieve EFSS now extended to 2007/8
500
0
Transport Best Value Policy review £20k & 14-19 £50k
LEA STRATEGIC CAPACITY
70
Transport Best Value 14-19 policy further developments £50k less saving on completion of policy review £20K
LEA STRATEGIC CAPACITY
30
E Government/Business Re -engineering ICT - the introduction of the Standard Desktop involves extra costs spread over a 3 year period, together with the need to enhance and develop existing IT facilities; provision for contribution to Children’s projects such as the Child Index Workforce Remodelling-Process review work to maximise effective use of E government
11.3 11.4
150
ICT
100
ICT
100
50 200
Workforce Remodelling
50 150
Workforce Remodelling
50 150
Page 2
D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\f42f158d-7882-4fda-8c72-f6da06d84302.xls
EDUCATION MTFS LEA BLOCK 2005/6 -2007/8 Service EDUCATION LEA BLOCK SubTotals 2006-07
PAPER A
LEA
11.5
Item 2005-06 Children's Act - Provision to meet strategic capacity requirements of Children’s Act.Requirements not yet clear but many nationally led initiatives now in progress.An example is the training for Education Social W orkers in the Common Assesment Frame work in 2005/6 (£60K)
OFSTED Action Plan
Sub Totals 2005-06 2005-06
Item 2006-07
2006-07
Item 2007-08
SubTotals 2007-08
2007-08
200
Children's Act
200
Children's Act
200
11.6
OFSTED Inspection - SEN Review OFSTED Inspection includes specific recommendations which must be addressed promptly to carry out major review of SEN Service implications to be included in review of Schools Block. EDUCATION SELF FUNDING FROM PLANNED UNDERSPENDS Small Schools & 14-19 Provision
250
SEN & Behaviour Review
150
SEN & Behaviour Review
0
11.7
Additional professional support for collaborative work including in 2005/6 14-19 collaboration as likely to be recommended in current LSC Inspection and resources to promote confederation etc in line with the new small schools policy Advocacy & Litigation A range of issues reflecting addititional responsibilities placed on the LEA & greater recourse to litigation by parents ,pupils etc
100
Additional professional support for collaborative workpreviosly included in 2005/6 14-19 collaboration as likely to be recommended in current LSC Inspection
50
Further developments
50
11.8
CAMAS- Extra Health & Safety Advisory time for Outdoor Activities,Science & Technology £25K Principal SEN Officer re complex Tribunals £45K Admissions-Revised co ordination arrangements £40K Child Protection & Childrens rights £25K 135 Meduim Term Issues
Advocay & litigation A range of issues reflecting addititional responsibilities placed on the LEA & greater recourse to litigation by parents ,pupils etc noting items absorbed in 2005/6 (see line 13.3)
100
Advocay & litigation A range of issues reflecting addititional responsibilities placed on the LEA & greater recourse to litigation by parents ,pupils etc
50
Extended Schools-loss of strategic capacity currently provided by Exrended Schools Team.Critically important in taking forward locality & collaboration strategies 11.9 Extended Schools 0 100
Extended Schools-loss of strategic capacity currently provided by Exrended Schools Team.Critically important in taking forward locality & collaboration strategies
100
Page 3
D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\f42f158d-7882-4fda-8c72-f6da06d84302.xls
EDUCATION MTFS LEA BLOCK 2005/6 -2007/8 Service EDUCATION LEA BLOCK SubTotals 2006-07
PAPER A
LEA
Item 2005-06 11.10
Sub Totals 2005-06 2005-06
Asset Management Total Strategic capacity
TOTAL council priorities
0 885 1,385 2,235
Item 2006-07 Asset Management - to provide effective support to implement an expanded and more complex capital programme together with major initiatives on Extended Schools and support of schools on Asbestos, Disability Discrimination Act requirements and their Asset Management. Total Strategic capacity
2006-07
Item 2007-08
SubTotals 2007-08
2007-08
35 785 2,005 2,669
Asset Management Total Strategic capacity
35 585 1,565 2,111
12.0 13.0 13.1
Directorate Bid (=8+9+10+11)
Reductions Offered SEN Review; self funded from planned underspendings Directorate to absorb time/delay tasks/respond less quickly;so as to take forward the following unavoiodable extra commitments .Note impact on achivement of Council Prioroties (see Paper C)
250
Reductions SEN Review; self funded from planned underspendings
150
Reductions SEN Review; self funded from planned underspendings Directorate Bid on strategic capacity excluding Youth & Home to School Transport is £585K This increase cannot be absorbed given existing low spending & extra commitments absorbed in 2005/6 together with the Directorate s need to achieve Gershon savings included as a countywide item in the MTFS 150 2,519
0
13.2 13.3
14-19 Collaboration & Confederation (see11.7 above)
Advocacy & Litigation re Health & Safety,SEN Tribunals,Admissions,Child Protection & Child s Rights( see11.8 above)
Total Reductions
100
135 485 1,750
Directorate s remaining Bid on strategic capacity excluding Youth & Home to School Transport is £635K This increase cannot be absorbed given existing low spending & extra commitments absorbed in 2005/6 together with the Directorate s need to achieve Gershon savings included as a countywide item in the MTFS
Total Reductions
0
0 0 2,111
14.0 15.0
Net Directorate Bid (=12-13)
Further Reduction in Directorate Bids The Directorate' "own bid " excluding inflation had allready been reduced to zero by the actions suggested in Section 13.It is important to stress the consequential impact of these "self " funding measures on a service which spends below EFSS on the LEA Block by £3M .Spending on regularity duties (£36 per pupil compares with the average of similar counties of £51 per pupil). The service will also need ,in addition to contribute to the corporate Gershon target' The impact of further reductions is summarised below Adjustments Deferred Bids Agreed 0
15.1 15.2
Page 4
D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\f42f158d-7882-4fda-8c72-f6da06d84302.xls
EDUCATION MTFS LEA BLOCK 2005/6 -2007/8 Service EDUCATION LEA BLOCK SubTotals 2006-07
PAPER A
LEA
15.3 15.4
Sub Totals 2005-06 Item 2005-06 2005-06 Item 2006-07 Initial Inflation Shortfall on anticipted FSS increase of 4% ( provisional figure actually lower by £202K( see 7.2) )-shortfall would not arise but for the mannner in which the Corporate top slice is calculated as it includes £273K relating to schools.Impact for Directorate of absorbing this would be to make savings which impact further on the issues outlined in section 13.2 & 13.3 above where the Directorate has allready proposed to absorb extra demands of £235K Consequently it is proposed to delay some of the outstanding Transport Best Value Phase 1 initiatives 48 Children Act Strategic Capacity The Council needs to consider the impact of not meeting its obligations for making the delivery changes needed to meet ,according to timetable the statutory obligations on the development of a Childrens Service.Note specific Grant of £65K is likely to be required to fund contributions to " mandatory"Govt initiatves such as Child Index & Assessment Training (see 11.5) ICT /E Government/Workforce Remodelling Potential impact of delay in Council & LEA obligations (national & local) on ICT .The bid related to the Directorate needs to support NYCC & DfES initiatives(see 11.3 & 11.4) Youth - Council commitment to national policy requirement In addition to the financial dangers of not raising spending the investment was intended to be a major contributer to the achievement of Council Plan priorities on raising attainment standards ( to meet national targets) & achieving inclusion.Note 7.7% EFSS settlement increase has added to "gap" Proposed to defer £300K to future years leaving bid of £200K (see 11.1) Total Deferred Bids Service changes agreed For service changes not agreed . See memo box below 200
2006-07
Item 2007-08
SubTotals 2007-08
2007-08
15.4
200
15.5
300
748 0
16.0 Memo
Balance (=14-15)
1,002
Page 5
D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\f42f158d-7882-4fda-8c72-f6da06d84302.xls
EDUCATION MTFS LEA BLOCK 2005/6 -2007/8 Service EDUCATION LEA BLOCK SubTotals 2006-07
PAPER A
LEA
Item 2005-06 Service Changes not Agreed Youth-Residual bid of £200k will still leaves "funding Gap" £1,033K to find in future years Home to School Transport -Market Forces Without the additional funding it will be necessary to withdraw from contracts & fail to meet our statutory obligations or our policy commitments to existing childrens & students if we withdraw from current discretionary provision on 1 April or 1 September 2005.
Increased Inflation shortfall on Provisional Settlement
Sub Totals 2005-06 2005-06
Item 2006-07
2006-07
Item 2007-08
SubTotals 2007-08
2007-08
15.6 15.7
200
600 203
15.8
The deferred & delayed bids above allready includes significant risk on the the Youth service which has increased as a result of the EFSS settlement as well as significant risks for the LEA s performance & making progress on the Childrens Agenda & meeting ICT needs.Finding further reductions ,for the reasons outlined above, would require further significant reductions in services to the public & schools & increase further the risks in meeting the Council ,DfES & the public's targets & expectations Total Service Changes not agreed 1003
Page 6
D:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\f42f158d-7882-4fda-8c72-f6da06d84302.xls