Global Warming and Water Management

Document Sample
Global Warming and Water Management Powered By Docstoc
					Global Warming and Water
       Management
 Can Cooperation help us avoid
  conflict over water scarcity?
                  The Problem
• Global warming will increase the uncertainties
  surrounding our water supply through more
  erratic rainfall, loss of snowmelt runoff, etc.
  Specific effects will vary by region.
• Most damaging to systems that are already
  stressed (IPCC reports that 1.7 billion people
  live in water stressed countries).
• So why does this matter?
  – People will fight over it.
     The Problem: Legal/Political
              Conflict
• Disputes in the developed world-
  – Waning Colorado River Water
  – Southeastern Drought
     • Army Corps of Engineers control how much water is released
       from Reservoirs in Georgia downstream to Florida and
       Alabama
     • Must take into account interests of each state (Georgia-
       municipal water/Florida-sportfishing stocks, oyster industry,
       endangered species etc).
     • Florida and Georgia both seeking legal action, Alabama has
       no water management plan despite two years of drought!
    The Problem: Legal/Political
           Conflict (2)




• The potential for reduced water supply to
  fast-growing Atlanta caused Georgia Gov.
  Sonny Perdue to lead a large group in a
  prayer for rain last Tuesday (Nov. 13).
  The Problem: Violent Conflict
• In and among undeveloped countries
  conflict supposedly will be much worse-
  Water Wars!!
  – Nordas and Gleditsch offer numerous
    alarmists quotes:
     • Dept. of Defense (Randall and Schwartz 2003)
     • UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon 2007
     • Kevin Noone Director of Intern. Geosphere-
       Biosphere Program
     • IPCC, more restrained but still alarmist and
       unscientific
 The Problem: Violent Conflict (2)
• What are the causal pathways?
  – Scarcity directly causes conflict, either within
    or between states.
     • Demand induced via population growth
     • Supply induced (either because of environmental
       change or substandard infrastructure)
     • Distributional-scarcity is greater for some groups
  – Climate changed induced migration may
    cause conflict in host communities
• We have a word for such reasoning….
The Problem: Violent Conflict (3)
Malthusian! Humans       Kantian! Humans can
are prisoners of their   cooperate.
environments…            Institutions help.
        Motivating Questions
• Is violent conflict over water inevitable?
  To what extent are the Malthusians right?
• Is it adaptation to water scarcity possible
  without violence? How do we currently
  adapt to scarcity? To what extent are the
  Kantians right?
How probable is violent conflict?
• Does scarcity directly lead to civil war? –
  Not really.
  – Raleigh and Urdal (2007): test a
    disaggregated model covering all
    countries, water scarcity matters but not that
    much compared to
    demographic, economic, and political
    variables.
  – What about just Africa though?
How probable is violent conflict? (2)
• Hendrix and Glaser (2007)
How probable is violent conflict? (3)
• Meier Bond and Bond (2007): precipitation
  variability doesn’t lead to increased cattle raids
  in the horn of africa.
• Will migration cause civil conflict?
   – Maybe (Reuveny 2007): counts 38 documented
     episodes of environment-induced migration, finds
     conflict results in 19 cases while the other 19 were
     peaceful.
   – Gleditsch and Salehyan (2007): refugees are more
     likely to spread conflict than cause it.
• What about interstate war?
How probable is violent conflict? (4)
• Evidence from Shared River Basins
• Gleditsch et al (2006)
How probable is violent conflict? (5)
• Yoffe, Wolfe, and Giordano (2003)
            Summary so far
• Conflict is certainly a possible result of
  climate change induced water scarcity but:
  – The causal chain between scarcity and
    conflict is still sketchy, general human misery
    is much more likely.
  – Conflict can be averted through successful
    water management. How does this work?
                   The Solution?
What is water management?
• Demand (restrict usage) and supply (build
  infrastructure) side regulations dealing with:
      •   Municipal water supply
      •   Irrigation
      •   Industrial
      •   Hydropower
      •   Navigation
      •   Pollution Control
      •   Flood Management
            The Solution? (2)
 As the IPCC notes (Ch. 4.6.4): “having the
  ability to adapt to change is not the same
  as actually adapting to change.”
 So why haven’t management tools been
  widely implemented?
   IPCC says (4.8.3)- we need more knowledge!
      Better monitoring data on supply and usage, better
       understanding of patterns of variability, better
       management techniques and decision criteria…
      But…Where’s the politics?
           The Solution? (3)
• The ability for relevant political actors to
  cooperate is critical for effective water
  management. Why?
  – Management is costly, who will bear the
    costs? How will losers be compensated?
  – Management choices are circumscribed by
    existing institutions
 Example of Water Institutions-CA
• “Water is the life-blood of Southern California” –
  MWD 1931.
• Local governments and water districts controlled
  water management pre-1920.
• Metropolitan Water District is a cooperative of 26
  member agencies
  – 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts, and the
    countywide San Diego Water authority
• Supplies 60 percent of the water used in Urban
  Southern California.
     Metropolitan Water District
• MWD’s early history is that of a water
  importer:
  – In late 1920s, MWD financed and built 242
    mile Colorado River Aqueduct.
  – In 1970s imported water from Northern CA via
    State Water Project’s Aqueduct system.
• How has MWD adapted to increasing
  water scarcity?
   Increasing Scarcity of Colorado
         River Water for CA
• California’s allocation is 4.4 MAF per year, plus
  half of any surplus. Arizona v. CA 1963.
   – Surplus allocation allowed CA to consume 20% more
     than its basic allotment.
   – Reduced streamflow cut surpluses, upper basin
     states, Arizona, and Mexico now using most of their
     allocation.
   – In 2002, Interior department limited CA to 4.4 MAF by
     declaring the end of surplus conditions.
           MWD’s Reaction
• Switch from water importation to in-state
  transfers from N. CA, conservation,
  storage, and rural to urban water transfers.
  – Required abandoning its traditional alliance
    with agribusiness.
• MWD faces opposition everywhere
  – Peripheral Canal Defeated in 1982 by Central
    valley interests and Environmentalists
  – Calfed Bay-Delta Program only partially
    implemented by 2002 Proposition 50.
  How is water conflict resolved in
            the U.S.?
• Institutional bargaining amongst every
  level and branch of government
  – Increasing scarcity merely exacerbates
    ongoing conflicts
  – The federal government and the court system
    arbitrate
  – Expertise aggregated into water agencies like
    MWD.
• Conflicts never turn violent, though there
  are always losers (i.e. Mexico).
      Questions for Discussion
• Given the lack of any water infrastructure
  and management in much of the
  developing world, can management be
  improved? Is migration a forgone
  conclusion?
• Is international water aid a realistic
  possibility?