Review No.:
REVIEWER'S REPORT
Your comments and suggestions are an important part of the review. Please type them in such a manner that they can be passed directly to the author(s) without revealing your identity or institution.
Title:
I. Checklist:
1. Is the paper original? 2. Is the paper of high scientific quality? 3. Is the paper especially important and timely enough to warrant rapid publication in UBICC Journal as a letter? 4. Is the paper well organized and clearly written? 5. Is sufficient information included (or cited) to support the assertions made and conclusions drawn? 6. Is the paper free from errors, misconceptions, or ambiguities? 7. Is the title appropriate? 8. Does the abstract include the important points of the paper? 9. Is the English satisfactory? 10. Are references to related work adequate? 11. Are the tables, figures, and their captions clear? ( ( ( ( ( ( )Yes )Yes )Yes )Yes )Yes )Yes ( ( ( ( ( ( )No )No )No )No )No )No ( ( )Yes )Yes ( ( )No )No ( ( ( )Yes )Yes )Yes ( ( ( )No )No )No
II. Interest to the Readers (Please check as many as apply.) This manuscript is…
( ) Important ( ) Useful ( ) Novel ( ) Timely ( ) Of minor value
III. Comments for Authors (Please use as much space as is needed.)
IV. Recommendation (Please check one.)
( ( ( ( ) Publish as is ) Publish upon minor revisions ) Re-submit after major revisions ) Reject outright
Submitted for possible publication in UBICC Journal as a letter
Review No.:
V. Comments for Editors (confidential to the authors)
Referee's Name: ................................................. Date: ...................................... Email Address: .............................................................................................................
Submitted for possible publication in UBICC Journal as a letter