LEED vs Passive House 1
LEED vs Passive House
The US Green Building Council otherwise known as the USGBC is specifically the dominant
entity when it comes to standards of green buildings in the United States. It is indicated in their
preamble, that such organization is committed in following and adhering to the five primary
values pertinent to the standards:
• Equity: The blueprint ought to present respect to the public as well as the cultures
existing together in it. Plans ought to be created taking into consideration all
• Progress: The blueprint ought to have quantifiable outcomes of a building’s impact on the
community, economics of the region as well as the environment.
• Inclusiveness: USGBC promotes community participation in community as well as
• Sustainability: A building ought to employ sustainable resources as well as knowledge.
• Connectedness: The design of a green building ought to revere the association linking
man and nature and identify his stewardship over it.
Accountability, clearness, management, novelty as well as truthfulness are the primary
values upheld in the standards concerned with green building. During the year 1998, the USGBC
instituted the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).
LEED vs Passive House 2
This particular system is concerned with the implementation as well as the design of the
green building standards. LEED provides and puts up charitable, consistent standards that
considers and takes in mind the whole building design. Through the employment of a scoring
system, it provides incentives to builders whose novelty in green building design pushes the field
even further. LEED’s objective is to render the standards of green building into a practicable
means of building that is recognized and acknowledged by the mainstream, not just
Primarily, there are five areas wherein a building is assessed by LEED. These are: Water
Efficiency, Sustainable Sites, Materials and Resources and Indoor Environmental Quality, and
Energy and Atmosphere. The degree of certification begins at Certified before continuing further
to Silver, Gold and Platinum. The highest level for this matter is Platinum. A lot of individuals
would have the conception that green building standards are too expensive. Even though there is
a specific increase when it comes to the price of the building, the component of green building
cites studies that confirm savings for this matter
The savings in energy incurred by owners of green buildings interprets to reduced costs,
aptitude to let out residential as well as commercial space for more and improved and more
pleased residents. There are reports indicating that a preliminary venture of two percent extra in
green building blueprint stands for about a 20% savings on the whole price of construction as
over the existence of the building.
LEED vs Passive House 3
There are also reports indicating that 4 US dollars (USD) per square foot venture earns
just about 58 USD per square foot over two decades. The paybacks are proven in health as well
as efficiency, operating and maintenance costs, investments in utilities and investments in
emissions. Buildings that were put up with green building standards demonstrate a two to 16%
boost in worker efficiency.
A number of buildings that stick on to green building standards employ grey water or
black water recycling systems, geothermal heating as well as cooling systems, skylights or
additional natural lighting, improved ventilation, solar or wind power, sustainable wood products
as well as twice filtered air. The debris coming from construction is most of the time reused for
other builders to employ in upcoming endeavors.
Basic Principles of Passive House
The term 'PassivHaus' pertains to a definite standard of construction related to residential
buildings which have exceptional console environment in both summer and that of winter.
These standards could be put into use not just to the residential region as the label indicates, but
also to industrial as well as public and commercial buildings. A residence which accomplishes
the PassivHaus standard characteristically involves:
• high-quality levels of insulation with minimum thermal bridges
• thorough consideration of the utilization of solar as well as internal gains
• exceptional level of air tightness
LEED vs Passive House 4
• first-class indoor air eminence, which is particularly provided by a whole house
mechanical aeration structure with highly proficient heat recuperation
Through the specification of these features, the blueprint of the heat load is restricted to
the load that could be delivered by the minimum necessary ventilation air. Consequently, a
PassivHaus does not demand a customary heating structure or active cooling in order to become
at ease to live in. The small heating requirement could be characteristically matched with the use
of a compressed services unit which incorporates heating, hot water as well as ventilation in one
unit even though there are other kinds of alternative solutions.
Passive House vs LEED
A home that is certified with LEED would diminish consumption considerably that is depending
on the degree of LEED certification that was given. Apart from this, it is also dependent on the
points that the builder prefers to pay attention to. There are more than a few levels or degrees
concerned with LEED certification, and the credits could be employed throughout any sum of
areas. This includes the reuse of water in the area, the consumption of energy as well as the
materials resources. On the other hand a Passiive House Standard home is +90% more competent
as compared to a new conformist home, devoid of dependence on PV solar arrays and passive
solar space heating. Essentially during the year 1988, Dr. Wolfgang Feist and Professor Bo
Adamson started constructing the notion of a building so tight as well as exceptionally insulated
that a building heating structure would not be necessary. The product was the world’s earliest
Passive House prototype.
LEED vs Passive House 5
In Passive house, the concept is to decrease energy expenditure as much as they could
afford prior to the integration of solar technologies like that of photovoltaics or solar heating.
The exemption is for solar panel domestic hot water heating since in such a well insulated house
this turns out to be the furthermost heat requirement, and it demands reduction in order to match
120 kwh per m2 per year restriction on energy use. The initial step is to properly plan the
residence to meet up the Standard, and that could prove to be really intense depending on what
climate there is in the region. The groundwork could be predominantly tricky to insulate. These
buildings characteristically are geometrically compact to lessen the surface to volume ratio.
Balconies are separately propped up to lessen cantilevers which compromise the thermal
The Passive House consultant would do a takeoff from the plans of the buildings and
enter the suitable information into the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) to discover
whether or not the design adheres to the Standard. Characteristically, this could be done several
of times prior to the passing of the building design. In Europe, a Passive House stands for a level
of greater ease. Passive House is a measure specially intended to reduce general energy use and
to reduce the building’s carbon footprint. The description also functions as an assurance of low
future building energy prices taking into consideration that the building is not tailored after being
LEED vs Passive House 6
In the case of which standard is better, there is the strong argument that Passive House
standards are more preferable at present and even in the next few years. For example, studies
have revealed that Energy Star homes are spending energy in much the same extent as houses
built to code level. Current researches of LEED buildings also revealed improved performance.
The performance rate was from 25 percent to 30 percent less energy as compared to non-LEED
buildings. However one of the drawbacks in this particular finding is that although there is a
difference in the performance of a LEED building to a non-LEED building, the difference could
prove to be futile and less important. This is particularly because of the rise of energy costs and
particularly due to the fact that from the start there is already a low bar set by non-LEED
For industries and individuals thinking of conforming and adjusting to LEED standards
as a business strategy, it would be more logical to take a step ahead of LEED and consider
Passive House standard altogether. Passive House although is a European approach, it well
commended for its energy-efficient homes. This standard, in particular establishes a very low
threshold concerning the particular amount of energy a house could possibly expend. This
particular standard is seen to be even more apparent in the next couple of years to come.
Feist, W. “From Low-Energy Buildings to the Passive House.” 2006.
Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. “The Costs and Financial Benefeits
of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force.” United
States Green Building Council, 2003.