Threatening Forged Bank A/c at Agreement Barbil with Sesa Goa Complaint: In the complaint In the Date and place from where the petition at paragraph complaint threatening was given to the 7 “there was an A/c in petition at Complainant is not mentioned in the State Bank of India, paragraph 8 the complaint. Barbil Branch, in complainant which crores of rupees alleged that the In the complaint in paragraph 9 the has been transacted in petitioners have allegation of threatening is scribed as the name of the entered into an follows: complainant.” illegal “The accused persons said that agreement with she is the more powerful lady in Kolkata She is silent in 161 Sesa Goa Ltd. and she knows very influential people in statement in regard to in the name of power through her Club circle and she the above allegations the complainant said that unless the complainant remain and have made silent she will hire the unsocial elements Report of IO dated huge for a lesser price to do away with the life 18.4.2007. transaction to of the complainant for good…..” put the criminal There is an inoperative “….. she will not be able to reach liability on the Champua in Keonjhar and on the way bank A/c in the name complainant. the accused no. 1 will her by road of Nrupen Roy, Sabita Roy, Bikramjit Roy & accident and will try to give it a colour of In the 161 natural road accident.” Abhijit Roy. There was statement she no bank A/c in the has stated that In paragraph 10 omnibus allegations name of the the petitioners against accused no.2 & 3 has been complainant. have made made. No specific allegation hurled agreement with against them. Allegations of use of Sesa Goa Ltd. criminal force and intimidation at and have made Kolkata is scribed. huge transactions in 161 Statement : her name by Seema Roy impersonation Allegation of threatening over telephone. by giving false Not a single whisper that she was ever documents. threatened at Bhubaneswar. She has categorically stated that the accused persons were threatening her prior coming to Bhubaneswar “the accused persons are threatening her if she will be coming to Bhubaneswar they will kill her by road accident”. Surjit Sen: He had stated that on 12.12.2006 the complainant came and disclosed that she received telephone from Smt. Mala Roy, wherein she stated that while returning from Champua she would be killed by road accident. He further remains silent about the place of receipt of such telephone call by the complainant. Variance in the statement of the witnesses vis-à-vis complaint allegations : In the complaint petition:- Seem Roy- She will be killed by road accident while going to Champua. In 161 statements she says she will be killed if she will dare to come to Bhubaneswar. Again Surjit Sen says that he heard from Seema that she received a telephone call to be killed while returning from Champua. 1. Alleged threat on dated 12.12.2006 at Bhubaneswar. 2. Complaint case filed on dated 29.01.2007, i.e., after 47 days from the date of occurrence. (a) No averment in the complaint case as to why F.I.R. was not lodged immediately. (b) No averment regarding inaction of Police to receive the F.I.R. Explanation in Column-6 of the complaint petition to the effect that complaint was filed as per the direction of the I.I.C., is vague and no explanation regarding non-filing of FIR. 3. Complaint petition was received by the Police and registered on 15.02.2007. The complainant appeared for the first time in the Police Station on 16.04.2007 even though she avers in the complaint petition about the eminent threat to her life and asks for protection to be provided to her for staying at Bhubaneswar. 4. As per F.I.R. allegation place of occurrence at OMC, Bhubaneswar. According to the Police spot visit-Plot No. , Ashok Nagar has been indicated (see CD dated 16.04.2007 at 3.30 PM/spot visit). 5. In the complaint she has averred that she is staying in USA in connection with her work whereas in her 161 statements she deposed that as she is not feeling safe she is residing in USA.