Docstoc

Peer Editing Worksheet(2)

Document Sample
Peer Editing Worksheet(2) Powered By Docstoc
					                            Peer Editing Worksheet
Author:

Editor:

Carefully read the paper all the way through. Having read the paper now go back
through with pen in hand and underline the thesis. Is it clear, that is, can you easily
discern what the thesis is? Is it concise, can it be encapsulated in one or two sentences? Is
it contestable, can it be argued against/is its point debatable or does it merely state the
obvious?




Now examine the rest of the paper more closely with this question in mind: how does the
rest of the paper connect to the thesis? How does the rest of the paper support the
thesis—are there ample illustrations and examples that expand the idea of the thesis? Are
there places where the paper strays from or contradicts the thesis? Where does the paper
do its best job of supporting the thesis? Where is it in need of the most work?




Are there places where grammar and spelling errors interfere with the message the paper
is attempting to communicate? Where are these?



Is the tone appealing and appropriate? Is the voice of the writer appropriate to the
subject matter? Is it consistent throughout? Where does it vary in an unhelpful way?




What are the three strongest features of the paper? What are the three areas that are most
in the need of improvement? Be specific.
                                  Peer Editing Sheet
Author’s Name___________________________ Peer
Editor____________________________

Yes No
___     ___    1. Does the draft discuss the circumstances for introduction of the species
into the new environment?

___   ___    2. Does the draft discuss the response of the introduced population to its
new environment?

___    ___    3. Does the draft discuss the effects of the introduced population on the
environment (including native species)?

___    ___     4. Are there sufficient sources to demonstrate unbiased information?

___    ___     5. Are the citations in the correct format within the text and on the Works
Cited page?

Now that you have responded to these questions, give the author some feedback on what
      you have read.

List three specific parts of the paper you like. You may refer to lines. Tell what about
        these sections/words/sentences/phrases you like.
1.


2.


3.


Give your author some suggestions for improvement. Please try to offer concrete
       suggestions dealing with content.
1.



2.



3.
Environmental Science                                                             Mr. Lancaster
Peer Editing Worksheet – 2nd Draft                                                    2/18/2010

Editor____________________________                                                 Period _____

Author ___________________________

Read the entire proposal before editing the parts.

Format
Has the author divided the proposal into the required sections of the format? Has he used
subheadings?

Introduction
Has the author sufficiently researched the background information of this project? Is all the
information cited correctly? What questions do you have?

What are the strengths in the author’s description and explanation of the purpose of the
project? Give details below.


Give the author specific suggestions for improving the description and purpose.

Who does this project benefit and how?

Procedure
 Does the author’s timeline for his plan of action utilize the time available wisely? Point out
any possible “time crunches” to the author.

Are you unclear about any aspects of the data collection or of time management? Ask
questions below that the author can use to clarify his procedure.

Describe how the author will present his research to the public. Make suggestions as to how he
might make this presentation more clear and interesting to his audience.

Working Bibliography
Review the author’s bibliography. Did he include the required number of sources of
information? Do all these sources relate specifically to the author’s project? Has he
investigated a variety of sources to get information? Advise the author on where he might look
for additional information or sources of a different type.

Grammar and Mechanics
Review the paper for mistakes in grammar and spelling. Mark any mistakes directly on the
paper, and offer specific suggestions below for rewriting any passages that are vague or
confusing.
Does the proposal contain all information necessary to receive a good grade on the final draft?
List below what criteria you would use to grade this proposal.

Assign a grade to the proposal. Explain why you graded it as you did (this will not reflect on
the author’s actual grade—it is a tool for the author to use in revising his final draft).

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Jun Wang Jun Wang Dr
About Some of Those documents come from internet for research purpose,if you have the copyrights of one of them,tell me by mail vixychina@gmail.com.Thank you!