POSSIBILITIES OF THEORY ONLY OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE UNIVERSE.
Shared by: fiman115
Life Universe by fiman115 Exploding black holes. Nature of dark matter. None of dark energy. Energy that is created or is infinite. The infinite must be eternal. The center of the universe. The universe is bigger than people think. Increasing or decreasing the microwave background. Variable speed of light in a vacuum. False dimensions. The universe rotates and expands. Because of the accelerated expansion of the universe. Recycling cosmic energy. Neither tears nor heat deaths. The Einsteinian Cosmofísica in the era science is still a very particular, almost, is half science, half- belief, because from observations and measurements with the proper tools of astronomy and the brilliant intervention of mathematics, is passed human interpretation of research results; interpretations projection made with the past and the future and at that time, which allows for any amount of conjecture, what would be nice if they were mostly framed within the parameters of logic and philosophical reasoning that guides the other sciences, but more serious is that rather, there are heaps of speculation, sometimes identified with the religious mythologies wildest or the most unbelievable imaginations friends of science fiction. Sometimes it seems that the possession of instruments for astronomy, is what gives the power to succeed in the interpretations of what is observed or measured. All that is seen through a telescope is so distant and so jammed that you should know this interpretation, access to a telescope is seeing more and not always guaranteed to have a successful argument for interpreting what looks best. And unfortunately, as a result of many observations and few successes interpretive find that almost all current theories about the end of the universe are deeply pessimistic, apocalyptic and only few dare to raise the possibility of a kinder future for our coexistence with the Universe . OPTIMISTIC THEORY The Universe, seen as all that exists (or simply the whole), is comprised of: space + matter + energy + time. And we humans are part of the whole, we have a bit of it. The universe for some, and the universe had a beginning for them is finite, it is only the visible universe, and for them the amount of energy contained in the material also is finite, say time is not eternal, that space is finite and it seems that, for them, space has to be growing to the extent that visible matter-energy expands. For others the space is infinite and eternal and matter-energy contained in space can be finite or infinite. Space, by simple logic, necessarily has to be: three-dimensional and infinite. To understand that space is infinite enough to rely on science: The philosophy and specifically in the logic, logical reasoning and imagine any possible limits or boundary of space and think that after that limit is imagination, the only possible answer is that there is more space, ie there are more of the same, so it can not be a limit to the continuous space indefinitely. To understand why both space and the universe are three-dimensional enough to understand that constantly radiate energy components of the visible universe, traveling at the speed of light across the empty space in all directions and the three-dimensional journey through space , has no end, because the prevailing theory on the electromagnetic energy tells us that electromagnetic waves in vacuum is self regenerate indefinitely and that energy while traveling is still part of the universe and the space occupied or used by the energy that travels is also part of the universe, and this will occur indefinitely, so the space and the universe must also be three dimensional, as are all the possible trajectories of the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the visible universe. The universe is infinite dimensional, claim otherwise is unscientific, because it go against logic, and logic is also a science, because the logic is a part of philosophy and philosophy is also a science. Therefore, in spite of believers in any "scientific" theory or any philosophical or religious belief, sometimes speak of that space can be finite or can be flat, curved or bent two-dimensional and, among other occurrences, all of them respectfully refer them to the most basic concepts of logic and physics to try to correct their misconceptions. The infinite space is empty, three-dimensional deformable, can not be bent or folded. Others believe that the universe may have more than three spatial dimensions, especially those who believe that space and time were also created in the big bang. If one believes that the space was created with the big bang has to believe that space is finite, because nothing that has ever been finite, which has had limits, as those who had the universe at the singularity, may grow to be infinite, because it would have to grow at an infinite speed, which is not possible. There may be abstractions that have beginnings and they are endless as a ray, but a ray does not arise at the point of origin and grows, a ray can not leave form, a ray will always be and be complete from the beginning to infinity . Otherwise it will never be a ray will always be a line segment growing. All the infinite must be eternal. Nothing that is infinite can be doing or forming.Everything that grows, always, can be measured, therefore can never become infinite, even to grow. Therefore: The space must be infinite and eternal. For the creationists and believers in the big bang can not have anything in the universe eternal or infinite, and that's their major problem in understanding the universe, so they can not even be infinite coordinates that define the spatial dimensions, simply because they would leave its finite space. For them the only possible space is occupied by the matter-energy. For them the space can only have finite form that has the matter-energy. So you can imagine multiple spatial dimensions and even multiple universes, sometimes parallel, double and content in each other.They believe that space and the universe is only what is achieved by the telescopes to see why even dare to calculate its diameter. They believe that the universe can be curved and to bend and / or black holes together and dream that we can go through those black holes into other universes and as confusing space with time to come to believe they can travel through of those holes into the past or the future.And when he shows them that there is no reason why telescopes, they say that it appears in the development of their equations. And we ask: What equations? The equations that serious or say inside a black hole the matter is compressed to the uniqueness and simultaneously claim that we can move quietly through black holes without harming us or the contradictory theory that the speed of light is constant in vacuum, where it is established that light is attracted by gravity to the vacuum and therefore can be slowed or accelerated as it moves away or approaches including a large mass through a vacuum and that even the light can be slowed by gravity to a black hole. Let us resolve many contradictions: The formulas are facts or interpretations are accommodated. Matter-energy is finite? In addition, other components of the whole, than the infinite space, as is the whole matter and energy, is that perfectly sum can be finite or infinite, as today we can not know because there is much matter- energy can not see or detect with instruments that do not emit any signal, both the proponents of different faiths as the wide variety of theories, we can continue to speculate on whether the total amount of matter-energy is infinite or not. It seems that the majority of: philosophers, scientists and believers simply believe it is finite, especially the creation and friends of the big bang. Creationists and believers in the big bang, all believe and have to believe, to be consistent with their faith, that the amount of energy-matter is finite and it is also constant, as also believe in the law of conservation of energy. Those who do not believe either in the creation or the big bang we are divided into two groups, those who believe that all matter-energy is finite and those who believe it is infinite. Among those who believe that matter-energy is finite and not believe in the big bang, most believe in the law of conservation of energy and there is another minority who do not believe in this law. There are also other minority group, which believes that all matter-energy is infinite and therefore not interested in the validity or invalidity of the law of conservation of energy, because the effect is the same, because an infinite number matter-energy over any other amount which may be developed or other amounts that are less likely to destroy, remains the same, an infinite amount. These different groups advocate different conceptions of the universe. The theories advocated by the majority groups are well known and very pessimistic, but the theories that advocate for minorities, are less well known, and are the only optimistic, so we intend to discuss them in this document. THEORIES: That is, we will propose four basic theories of minorities or four possibilities for a hopeful end to the universe: The of those who believe that the matter-energy is finite, and not believe in the law of conservation of energy. (Theory of the great heresy). The of those who believe that the matter-energy is finite, and if you believe in the law of conservation of energy but also believe in the recycling of matter and energy. (Theory of Cosmic Recycling). Of those who believed that all matter-energy is infinite and therefore not interested in the validity or invalidity of the law of conservation of energy. (Theory of eternal infinity). Of those who believe that energy-matter is every possibility: It is infinite, which is created and recycled. (Theory of the Universe live) If either is true ... The universe will not have a bad end. These theories optimistic minorities have common ground, namely: The space and time are infinite and eternal. The rest of the universe, or matter and energy is an amorphous, three-dimensional set. About as likely to have the visible universe or the set of matter-energy known, said that some people say it can be flat or may even be well-known forms of objects such as saddles, helmets areas, funnels , threads or horns, others believe that the most reasonable is that it is amorphous or like a cloud or perhaps, as irregular as roasted corn, what if we are convinced is that there must be three- dimensional and somewhat irregular. We do not believe in more than three spatial dimensions, because when some theorists, such as the advocates of string theory, try to explain what the other spatial dimensions, especially the fifth, sixth, seventh and so on, so come to realize is that refer to multiple "dimensions" as coordinates finite, then you can imagine shapes dimensions: flat, curved, gimped, parallel or bent, but which nonetheless are not really other spatial dimensions, because there are coordinates infinite dimensions but rather of parts and components of the beings who want to locate in three dimensions. We believe that confuse the general spatial dimensions and infinite with finite size and specific forms of the components and the positions that can take people into space. Sometimes, even, come to imply that the problem of the many other dimensions can not be understood by normal people and normal intelligence, almost argue that this is an issue of gifted and gifted. We give as an example of the difficulty in understanding the multiple dimensions existence of other examples, like the story, that a viewer sees in the distance extended power cable and you think it is a line that has only one dimension, the which is its length. But that ants walking on the wire is clear that the cable has other dimensions as well as thick and consists of helical strands, which appear to be gimped for them, other "dimensions", simply that the observer, by far not I can understand why not see them. To these arguments we question them, is that the thickness of the cable and its respective coil are no longer contained within the first three simple infinite dimensions, those which all normal people know and understand. In short ... we believe that nothing can exist outside of a simple three-dimensional infinite space, everything that we imagine must be within the first three infinite dimensions. For us the spatial dimensions are determined by three infinite straight as coordinates that intersect each other perpendicularly at a point that is common to them. For those who believe in more than three spatial dimensions the coordinates defining finite dimensions can be any line or any plane or any shape, any shape, but finite, and that is serious and unforgivable error. The fourth dimension Another similar case is the consideration of Einstein and other scientists, while qualifying as the fourth dimension. We believe that there was no reason to classify it as a spatial dimension, since it is a temporal dimension, a dimension that is different in nature. That problem would be for the theory of relativity to consider three dimensions of space and time dimension to the space differently. We believe the time is not absolute and linear observers, but observers analyzing objects moving at speeds impossible movements in curved spaces and / or cyclic, time must be relative, even when that time is not considered fourth spatial dimension and time dimension but simply different from the spatial. Space, time and the universe are as they are, whether there are observers or no matter how things seem to be observers, especially when it comes to analysis of imaginary things is supposed to be able to move faster than possible, because so that something can move at speeds approaching that of light, that something has to be energy. The objective reality of the universe should not depend on sensory relativity of observers, which among other things, are not necessary for the functioning of the cosmos. The origin of the universe And regarding the issue of the origin of the universe, it seems that the majority believe that had a beginning, some say it was created out of nothing or an empty kind of agitation and others say it originated from a strange and very compact hot point who made a tremendous explosion, but generally, do not tell us whether that point, they called the Singularity, was created or has always existed, so if you say is that, within this point, it was all that exists and may exist,including the empty space and even time. Other less dramatic, but equally mythical effect, say was not as small as a point but it was more like an egg. Of course, that some religious do not want to fight with science and scientists do not want to fight with religion, say that the dot was created incredible and so try to please both sides. The end of the universe Concerning the end of the universe, most of the best known theories are deeply pessimistic and predict an apocalyptic end. Some, the friends make thermodynamics a panacea, saying ending: cold, sparse, dark and degraded and, until recently, believed that when the universe expanded finish following the big bang again to contract the effect of the severity and possibly repeat the history of explosive dot, although recent discoveries about the accelerating expansion of the universe point to think that not going to be possible. So it is going to have to invent another theory of the origin of the universe different from the incredible explosion. Anyway for those who believe in apocalyptic end until they are right, if they want to be consistent with their beliefs, so it must be for them in order of the universe, because if they consider the amount of matter-energy is finite and constant and universe is expanding and they are rapidly losing density without retraining, since then, necessarily for them, will have to end up torn or dispersed. Others reply: that he who created the universe, just one day will give you order and do not explain why. Others believe that the universe (space + energy + matter) even the weather, always there and always will be there, we believe that the All is eternal, even if we, humanity, any observers and even our planet we present passenger . Differences between the optimistic theories of minorities: 1. The of those who believe that matter-energy is finite and does not believe in the law of conservation of energy. They believe that energy is created. (The great heresy). 2. The of those who believe that all matter-energy is infinite and therefore not interested in the validity or invalidity of the law of conservation of energy. (Theory of eternal infinity) 3. The theory that the amount of energy and matter is constant but that is recycled, (Theory of Cosmic Recycling). 4. Of those who believe that energy-matter is every possibility: It is infinite, which is created and recycled. (Theory of the Universe live). The great heresy They defend those who dare, with some modest but troubling arguments, to question momentous principles of physics to this day considered immovable. Very despite thermodynamics friends and defenders of the things constant, static and things that are always retained, dare to think that even empty space is infinite dimensional, the sum of matter and energy existing in, however, are finite, and even labeled as heretics, believe that energy-matter is in constant growth, which not only the visible universe expands tour and increasing the space between most of the galaxies, but that matter and energy also reproduce, procreate car, increasing its amount, to the extent that rapidly colonize the infinite dark empty space, but without losing density and reaffirming its rationale, it is to grow to immeasurableEach time, infinite space to fill but for the time infinite. In laboratories and on everyday life here on earth, we see that energy could not be created or destroyed by man, and partly based on this observation, it was established as a universal law the principle of energy conservation when not even been able to see the whole universe, nor could fully understand, how dare we say that a limitation to man on earth is also a limiting factor in this vast and amazing universe, not yet reached to know and understand. Energy is created Proponents of the Great Heresy dare to question principles of physics, taken place, simply because they could not give a satisfactory explanation to the observed phenomena in the universe. If we consider that in science everything is clarified, it is better not continue reading this heresy. What are these arguments to consider that energy is created and becomes subject and that in turn this creates more energy and so the universe grows. 1. An example is the recurrent potential energy of the tides, which is not the result of the transformation of any other power, because the moon is not permanently lost their kinetic energy that maintaining high tide, the water promontory attracted by the moon and running through the balloon continuously as the earth rotates. And the land also declined steadily slows its rotation speed or kinetic energy. That potential energy, the promontory of water, is continually creating. Tidal generators, located in the path of this "big wave" generated electricity every day with new tides which in turn are created continuously by gravity from the moon. If the moon, earth, or both, have to continually invest part of their kinetic energy to be transformed into tidal power and would have ended colliding. And until we know more away. In this case the gravity and orbital movements create energy. 2. The heavenly bodies, asteroids, satellites and some spacecraft after they have left the gravitational pull of the earth, are mobile, they can travel by taking advantage of gravity, inertia and vacuum, its kinetic energy is constantly being updated, created, is the product of circumstances, the mobile trajectory and gravitational properties of matter and not consumption or transformation of other types of energy. Rather, interstellar travel, are due to the recurrent appearance of a series of successive gravitational potential energy, that appear in cascade, to the extent that the motive in question, it leaves the gravitational influence of a celestial body that Evading and is introduced into the gravitational field of the next. That path followed by the phone may be circumstantial and amounts of potential energy and kinetic energy can be very different result depending on whether the motive collides with one of the celestial bodies or avoid making them passes near the collision and continue making your trip . The gravitational potential energies are created as a specific event happens, as it is, whether a mass is introduced into a gravitational field. If the amount of energy is constant, the amount of energy resulting in this example would not depend on the circumstances or the path followed by the mobile. If your phone does not hit it more energy than if it hits, because if it does not hit, and continues its path, a new gravitational potential energy that could not exist before because the phone could not get to your new site, where it can be reinvigorated by the proximity to the new celestial body that is in its path. 3. Something similar occurs with the magnetic potential energies that can appear or not appear depending on the circumstances. For example, if a ferromagnetic body falls by chance within a magnetic field or not. If it does, a new magnetic potential energy and therefore is more energy than it would if the act does not occur. If the amount of energy is constant, the resulting energy should not depend on chance or randomness that the failure occurs or not. 4. In large celestial bodies, especially in solids, which have been formed over billions of years due to the accumulation of material by the pull of gravity, internally generated, permanently, alarge amount of thermal energy due to the great pressures that reach inside formed by the accumulation of mass. You might assume that this heat energy is the result of the transformation of gravitational potential energy that had the masses that have been impacting the celestial body during the training process. In the light of the law of conservation of energy, the resulting thermal energy should equal the sum of gravitational potential energy than when they were attracted to each and every one of the parties that have shaped the celestial body.But it is clear that these two energies are not equal. Explanation: The sum of the gravitational potential energy possessed masses that have been impacting the celestial body during the training process is limited in quantity, is limited for commensurable magnitudes of their masses and their accelerations and will always be finite amount of potential energy. If the celestial body in question is not destroyed by any cosmic event and lasts over time, while there, you're constantly generating heat energy inside, so it would be a generation of heat energy indefinitely, if not eternal rather say it is an inexhaustible source of energy. Not all thermal energy generated within the celestial body is due to the impacts. A limited amount of potential energy can be transformed into an unlimited amount of thermal energy. The heat produced by the impact eventually on the outer bark is dispersed in a given time and permanently heat produced by the internal pressure will disperse continuously for an indefinite period while the internal pressure exists, ie while there is a celestial body. The temperature is constantly generated by the internal pressure is greater than the temperature generated occasionally by any external shocks. Therefore large celestial bodies create heat because of its accumulated mass and thermal energy that is not the result of another energy transformation, or ... What is that? ... If no other power, the law of conservation of energy can not be valid. Matter, by its nature, has the physical properties necessary and sufficient for energy: The matter has mass, between two masses the attraction of gravity, as well as inertia and there also exists a vacuum and with the lack of bearings, and those are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of gravitational movements. When balancing the velocities of the bodies to their masses and therefore their attractive forces, resulting orbital movements are continuous and ongoing, and where there is perpetual motion kinetic energy is continuous. If the cosmos creates endless continuous movement, it also creates kinetic energy permanently. Kinetic energy is energy of motion. The universe moves and spins and everything within the universe moves and moves by the energy, and moves each time, the faster it moves to expand rapidly, with increasing energy. Orbital systems are natural generators of energy. 5. On earth as much wind power is the product of solar energy conversion, but there are a significant part of wind power is not the product of solar energy conversion, but the product of rotational motion of the earth and product of the pressure difference between the different atmospheric layers. This phenomenon can be understood better if we try to isolate the different causes of winds and imagine the earth without the sun, and looks like any rocky planet with rugged topography and atmosphere, which rotates on its axis, but it has no nearby star will radiate heat to warm the atmosphere, in which case, that atmosphere, not to be rigid, it moves trying to follow the rotation of the planet, but does so at lower speeds, the lowest layer of the atmosphere is hectic or driven for the relief of the planet's surface. In the crests of the mountains along the strip near its line of Ecuador provides a permanent wind moves relatively with respect to the surface, and which seems to be moving in the opposite direction of planetary rotation. The kinetic energy of the planet's rotation creates permanently. If installed generating windmills along the line of Ecuador, can generate power indefinitely. That electricity generated by windmills and generators is not the result of the transformation of any other type of energy different from the kinetic energy is regenerated, because the celestial bodies that rotate on their axes, do not consume or require any energy, because their rotation is due to an inherited inertial motion in a vacuum, where there is friction between the atmosphere and surrounding empty space and its kinetic energy associated with rotation is not diminished by installing windmills. Why wind power thus obtained on planets without sun, new energy, energy is created. So the Law of Conservation of energy is not valid because the amount of energy is not constant but varies with the circumstances. A portion of the vertical wind cycle is not due to solar heating but is due to the different pressures between the upper and lower layers of the atmosphere. The lower layers where the pressure is greater because of this heat, reduce density and amounts to an Archimedes' principle and the upper layers where there is less atmospheric pressure, are kept cooler and denser and descend. The kinetic energy of this cycle vertical movements up and down, is energy generated by: the atmosphere, gravity and the pressure difference and at no time corresponds to the transformation of some other kind of energy. Natural ventilation chimneys, fireplaces different solar and wind, sometimes used in architecture, tunnels or mines, are basically an enclosed space with two openings: a lower and an upper and inside the air naturally circulates from the bottom up because, among other things, to the mouth is greater than atmospheric pressure than there is in the upper mouth. Part of this phenomenon occurs independently of solar and wind outside and some of that kinetic energy of moving air is energy created by: the atmosphere, gravity and the pressure difference and at no time corresponds to the transformation some other kind of energy. Proponents of the theory of the Great Heresy, argue that the nature and the universe creates energy, although the man has not been able to develop artificial perpetual motion engine. The nature if you have natural engines of perpetual motion. For example: a celestial body that rotates continuously in space inertia, which contains conductive materials as components of its structure and its own magnetic field, like so many, is simply a generator of energy. Is not this what happens in neutron stars with large magnetic field and rotating at high speed and generate and emit untold amounts of electromagnetic energy. IN BRIEF: Gravity is a creative force of energy: Because of gravity creates pressure and thermal energy within the masses: planets, stars, stars and black holes. Due to gravity, vacuum, inertia and lack of friction between the moving bodies without touching the void, creating the continuous orbital motion, or kinetic energy that is created permanently. Many phenomena indicate that energy is created by those facts and the reasoning above is considered to have risen to the top of the physical law of conservation of energy was a lightness to be reconsidered. Friends of science do not hold to security of tenure, to the absolute, to constant, the static, the conservatism, this practice hinders the search for truth. These arguments have been presented for analysis to physical and cosmofísicos and rather try to confuse us or ignore us, before trying to give us a satisfactory explanation to make us give up to continue wielding these facts as evidence against a principle that we do not share . We do not agree with some scientific practices before analyzing the causes of new phenomena observed precedence over the laws and principles laid down as dogma that can not be questioned as the results of the observations are not consistent with its laws and beliefs, rather are to be devised new constants to justify the embezzlement, however great, for instance, invented the "inflation" when the measures of the universe do not agree with his beliefs, if necessary, invent reach 96% of universe extra dark, instead of challenging their principles, their foundations and their beliefs. For example, why do not more research on the causes of the accelerated expansion of the universe, and investigate the possibility that the universe rotate on its axis with a centrifugal force responsible for the expansion before devised a 75% dark energy and their hypothetical strange repulsive force against gravity, and so to deny or unwilling to recognize that the whole tour, similar to how the planets revolve around the sun and planetary systems around galactic centers and so on all cosmic structures. Let us believe in a static universe, everything is dynamic, everything moves, movement is an inherent property of all existence. In the universe can not be quiet. Inside immobile things heat is generated by the pressure of gravity and the heat is motion. The movement is the nature of the universe. The first statement of the law of conservation of energy says that energy can not be created and the second statement, said that neither can be destroyed and that only can be transformed into other energy forms. And the law is complemented by the approach that the energy is degraded to become dissipated heat at low temperatures that can not be reused. What would be true if the universe did not have partial and temporary systems for the collection and recycling of energy degraded. According to the law of conservation of energy in all processes of transport and movement, the energy invested, has only two alternatives: 1. That energy becomes inverted: a part in some other form of energy, either potential or any other kind and that the other party, be degraded as heat due to friction of the body transported either friction with the air or the floor or internally in bearings. 2. Which degrades the energy invested all, when the body transported not gain new or loses potential energy that could have had. As it is virtually impossible to verify and measure, as in a laboratory, all the heat energy, even the smallest fraction of a degree of heat, which may occur in all processes of friction likely to arise associated with the kinetic energies of all that is moves in the universe, that's why you can not prove in practice the universal validity or invalidity of the second statement of the law of conservation of energy. Faced with this difficulty and lack of evidence, we believe that say one thing or another is more speculative theory that the basis for a law. Some of us dare to believe that it may be possible that a good part of the energy, now thought to be degraded, can be destroyed, or transformed into a kind of "work" or a comparable magnitude with the magnitudes of the energy invested. But there is much point in arguing today about something that definitely would be speculative for now. Anyway, if we assume as true what ... the energy that can not be destroyed and that only can be transformed and / or degraded as with the kinetic energy involved in any kind of movement, and until we know everything is constantly in motion, which results in that, anyway, everyone, believers and nonbelievers in the law of conservation of energy we must accept that the energy degraded over time has been very, very energy. We must also take into account all that energy that radiates permanently and has always delivered all visible matter. Such a large amount of energy (electricity and all kinds of electromagnetic waves) radiate in all directions and travel through space. Will we have asked, what about all that energy?, Where is it?, Why where you going?, Why it serves the energy?. Or will we ever, we have given satisfactory answers to these questions. There will be some opportunities that we confuse this large amount of energy degraded and dispersed throughout the universe with alleged fossils of the big bang. If in future we can see that the intensity of radiation from the cosmic microwave background is increased rather than decreased, as it seems, will be given another blow to the belief in the big bang as we hit him with the finding that the universe is expanding rapidly. We believe that the energy degraded into heat, very low temperatures it does is keep some parts of the visible universe at temperatures slightly above absolute zero, that is - 273.15 degrees Celsius or 0 degrees Kelvin, proof, is that nowhere in the visible universe were detected with the absolute zero temperature and this situation is for that atoms do not completely lose its internal activity and volume and is likely to collapse, that we can not know because, at least in the universe visible, it seems impossible to achieve absolute zero. These temperatures, resulting from the degradation of energy, though minimal, ensuring that subatomic components, whether particles, strings or membranes, to be active, with minimal vibration, and not lose their ability to emit electromagnetic energy. In laboratories, it has been known colder temperatures colder than the lowest temperatures recorded in nature, and very close to absolute zero and has been observed that gases such as helium virtually disappear very near zero degrees K, then of undergoing a process of loss of volume and loss of subatomic activity. Motors partial and temporary natural recyclers of energy degraded. From these facts we deduce that the microcosm level atoms and black holes and supernovae cosmos macro level have, as another of its functions, serve as engines of brokers and recyclers also degraded the energy either as heat or any other type of radiation emitted into space. Both atoms and black holes take the energy of the medium and with it the atoms can maintain a minimum internal activity, and black holes and store it until he has become cumulatively amounts of matter and energy, useless, in untold amounts of mass can produce high pressures, high temperatures and large nuclear explosions. Because of gravity creates pressure and thermal energy within the masses: planets, stars, stars and black holes. Is that absolutely all the great cosmic explosion that happened and have always known that continue to occur continuously, can always be attributed to supernova explosions? It will also have exploited the black holes?, We can not deny that with certainty, because if we did not know until recently even the existence of black holes, we would know all of its functions. We believe there are reasonable grounds to believe that black holes should not be eternal and they all, even the stellar mass and can explode, and not just what can make mini black holes that are believed to evaporate and explode , which, among other things, it seems a contradiction, because if a black hole can not get anything, not even light, how can you think that may escape its large and dense evaporated mass?. We believe that all black holes may develop. We believe that the universe is partially recycled and permanently collecting and concentrating large masses which then explode and the process repeats indefinitely. Dark Matter We believe that everything is energy. That matter is also energy. That matter can be transformed into energy. If the energy is condensed forms of matter. Matter is energy dense and concentrated less active than energy. There are two types of matter depending on their degree of organization of its internal activity and its temperature: active or visible matter, organized in the form of atoms that emit radiation and cold matter, de-energized or dark matter, inactive, not organized in atoms and that does not radiate electromagnetic energy. In other words: The subject matter is very cold idle, lacks power to organize in the form of atoms and / or it does not emit radiation, so it is also called dark matter. The visible matter is relatively hot material or medium energized, organized into atoms, or known matter is active material emitting radiation, not only light, like that emitted by stars, but all kinds of electromagnetic waves and this energy travels space in all directions, ie covering the three- dimensional space. It is logical that the space near the joint material known where we inhabit is very saturated with radiant energy emitted by the visible universe and the outer peripheral space, more distant, larger, colder and darker, this increasingly saturated radiation. Out in the cold outer space, possibly at lower temperatures than those recorded by the cosmic microwave background, is irregularly dispersed as much dark matter, which has not yet reached to be activated by radiant energy or issued and sent to beyond the active material or by the emerging energy inside their multiple black holes where that becomes more concentrated and dense cold matter, pending reactivation by sufficient heat and pressure buildup and explosion due its nuclear activity. A portion of the dark matter is distributed in the form of nodes, such as black holes, and some are free as subatomic particles between visible matter, but as much dark matter is located in outer space, orbiting a irregular cortex involving attracting visible matter, thanks to its greater mass. On that cold, dark outer bark of black holes proliferate, capturing the power-irradiated material that escapes the visible universe. No dark energy We believe that there is no dark energy, we believe that there is only dark matter, but that is the same material known, the same components subatomic available as raw material to be reactivated and build atoms, and in the meantime are just that, raw material, dark matter, idle, cold and de-energized, sometimes compact black holes in young and sometimes very sparse and unevenly dispersed as micro cosmic dust "of subatomic particles, so subtle, low mass and so sparse that fails to interact with visible matter. We see no anti-gravity or repulsive force that is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. The total mass-energy of the universe can not contract and collapse, because it orbits quickly around its center of gravity with centrifugal force increasing rapidly due to the continuous energy supply which is incorporated as kinetic energy of the accelerated process of expansion of the universe , whether that energy is the result of the further processing of dark matter and visible matter or energy that also provided much of that energy is created, where the great heresy is valid. The explosions of black holes and supernovae alternative revive and permanently expanding the rotation of the Universe as a whole. These higher concentrations of dark energy located irregularly in the periphery, orbiting too fast in outer space, help the accelerated expansion of the known universe, pulling out, the effect of gravity to the smaller set of visible matter and energy that surrounds us and is located closer to the center of the Whole. Contradictory in many ways the friends of the big bang and the creationists, saying that the universe has no center because it exploded simultaneously everywhere. To them I ask: That was one point that exploded or were several points. If for them the universe is finite must have a center as it has everything that is finite. Dark matter very dense as black holes can not occupy or evenly saturate all the empty space would not be possible because the lack of friction that makes feasible the orbital motions of heavenly bodies. Without inertia empty and nothing orbit. If valid the "great heresy" energy will be created if it is valid as long as the theory of "eternal infinite" energy-matter is infinite and always available. And if they are valid either, will validate a "theory of cosmic recycling. Black holes and supernovae are where they are collected cosmic wombs, gestate and / or recycle the new energies to the conquest of the infinite future, cold and dark void. The cycle is repeated indefinitely, the amount of matter and energy will be increasingly visible and colonize more space is infinite and well during the infinite time. The visible matter, currently activated energy is only 4% of the limited universe accepted by the friends of big bang, and which is just how little we have seen by telescopes. Much remains to be discovered. Whether the energy-matter is infinite or believed, because it validates the great heresy, however the future of the universe will not be apocalyptic. The universe grows and recycling, so there will be no heat deaths or tears. Matter and energy have all the physical properties necessary and sufficient to perpetuate, whether growing or recycled. Energy is created or the matter is infinite and / or recycled. The visible universe is known and increasingly large, increasingly more dark matter will be activated and become active material in visible matter and energy, will turn increasingly more infinity. email@example.com The cosmofísica, in the era of Einstein, has allowed the positioning of many mystical and cosmological understandings of science fiction fans, who have plunged into a maze of contradictions and paradoxes very difficult to resolve, unless a whole new take hold scientific thinking of thinkers and researchers sensible paradigms and revolutionize the study of the cosmos to redirect the path of scientific discovery, bypassing the current fashions and eccentricity that seems to have mistakenly believed that as far away from logic, it will be aswiser, perhaps because most unintelligible. When in the future, overcome the Einsteinian era, we can see and understand several truths: That all black holes explode. That black holes do not evaporate. That dark matter is the raw material of known matter. The absence of dark energy. We will know that energy is created or it is infinite. That everything must be eternal infinite. We will see the center of the visible universe. That the universe is bigger than it has always been believed. We will know whether increasing or decreasing the microwave background. That the universe is infinite and time is eternal. We will know that the speed of light is also variable in a vacuum. We forget about the false multiple spatial dimensions. Understand how the universe rotates and expands. We will know the causes of the accelerated expansion of the universe. Understanding the mechanisms of cosmic energy recycling. Will differentiate the space of time. Separating the science fiction and mythological beliefs. Shall not impose dogmas of science. Do not expect or even rips heat deaths. Understand our responsibilities as part of ALL. We'll have much more to know. We will have a more optimistic view of the universe.