Docstoc

Referee name

Document Sample
Referee name Powered By Docstoc
					“Transnational PathoGenoMics”



                          Evaluation Form – Full proposals

Referee name

Project reference no.

Coordinator

Project title


Conflict of Interest:
Please refrain from evaluating the proposal in case of past (up to 3 years) or present
collaborations or other interactions with the applicants or the proposed host institutions or if you
are expecting benefit in a professional, financial, or personal matter from the success or failure of
this application.


Please perform the evaluation procedure in the following 3 steps:


Step 1:
Please enter a point score for each evaluation criterion

                                                                                 Your point
            Evaluation criterion
                                                                                 score (1 to 5) 1:
 1.         Scientific quality, innovation and international competitiveness
            of the proposal

 2.         Scientific expertise of the consortium and chance of success


 3.         Quality of the organisation and coordination, multidisciplinarity,
            appropriateness of time and work schedule, feasibility
            according to existing and requested resources (equipment,
            man power, etc.)

 4.         Impact for public health


 5.         Prospects for the transfer of results into clinical and/or
            industrial application (quality of exploitation plan, economic
            innovation potential, market potential and competitiveness,
            patent situation)

                                                                                 Sum:
1
    5 = excellent, 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = poor, 1 = very poor
Step 2:
Please summarize your comments on the strengths and weakness of the proposal in a short
written report of half a page. This report will NOT be given as feedback to the applicant.




Please summarize your comments on the strengths and weakness of the proposal in a short
written report (2-4 lines) as feedback to the applicant.




Step 3:

Rank all proposals that you have read according to:

No. 1 - the best proposal
No. 2 - the second best proposal
No. 3

For each proposal, please indicate the project reference no. and the name of the project
coordinator

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:7
posted:2/14/2010
language:English
pages:2