Post 2012 Climate Change Adaptation Financing Mainstreaming
Shared by: puw61439
Categories
Tags
climate change, climate change adaptation, developing countries, developed countries, sustainable development, adaptation strategies, adaptation projects, disaster risk reduction, adaptation policy, greenhouse gas emissions, unfccc secretariat, energy financing, in bali, adaptive capacity, climate change mitigation
-
Stats
- views:
- 15
- posted:
- 2/10/2010
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 19
Document Sample


Post 2012 Climate Change Adaptation
Financing & Mainstreaming –
Developed Country Perspective
New Delhi, 30th Aug, 2007
Ms. Pamposh Bhat
Director, Climate Change Unit, GTZ.
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 1
Road Map
Present Climate Change Regime
Political Legal Situation of India
Present Adaptation Scenario in India
Government of India Initiatives
Post 2012 Climate Change Regime
EU Strategy
German Position
India’s Expectation
Common Vision
Role of Developed Country
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 2
Political – Legal Situation, India
Signatory to UNFCCC and ratified Kyoto Protocol
NATCOM 1 submitted, Second National Communication
Launched
Fully established CDM Authority
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 3
Global Registered Project Activities by
Host Party
300 268
275
250
225
200
175
150
105
125 106
90
100
75
50 19
16 16 11 10 9 9 9 10
25
0
India Brazil China Mexico Chile Malaysia Republic of Honduras Philippines Argentina Ecuador Indonesia South
Korea Africa
Country Name
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 4
Host Country Approved Projects, as on
26th July -2007 - Sectorwise
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 5
Sector-wise break-up: CERs Expected till
2012 from HCA Projects as of 26th July 2007
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 6
Government of India, Initiatives
PM’s Council on Climate Change
National strategy paper on climate change before CoP 13 – Bali,
Indonesia ( 3 – 14 Dec, 2007)
A huge afforestation programme of six million hectares
A High Level Expert Committee on Impacts of Climate
Change
To Identify key vulnerabilities & adaptation strategies
Adopted different Policies and Acts
Electricity Act, 2002
Energy Conservation Act, 2002
National Environment Policy, 2006
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 7
Present Adaptation scenario :
Funding not at all commensurate to the need
– Mostly for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island
Developing States (SIDS)
Funding very difficult to access due to complex
procedures
Few projects on implementation of adaptation measures
in India
Mainstreaming ????
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 8
Adaptation in India, GTZ Initiative
Name: Climate Change Adaptation in Rural Areas
Lead executing agency: Indian Ministry of Environment
and Forests
Implementing partners: States
Budget: € 7.5 million Euros
Project duration: 5 years
Pilot states: Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal,
Tamil Nadu
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 9
Proposed Problem Statement of the Indo-
German Adaptation Programme
“Public investments programmes are not “climate proof“
and public development programmes do not sufficiently
focus on strengthening the adaptation capacities of the
rural poor.”
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 10
Programme´s Objectives
Rural communities have access to innovative and
affordable technical & financial adaptation instruments.
Policy makers incorporate climate change concerns into
rural public investment programmes
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 11
Programme Elements
1. Application of rapid risk analysis / vulnerability &
adaptation assessments
2. Development & testing of technical adaptation solutions
3. Development & testing of financial instruments (weather-
based insurance)
4. Development & testing of mechanisms of climate proofing
5. Mainstreaming of 1-4 into large scale public rural
investment programmes
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 12
Post 2012 Climate Change Regime
Different People Different thoughts
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 13
Post 2012 EU Strategy:
Broader International Participation in reducing emissions:
Rigorously pursue all major world emitters to commit to a binding scheme
World emissions must be reduced by 50% (cf.1990),by 2050
Inclusion of Sectors:
Aviation and Maritime must be included in market based mechanisms
Sectoral emission reductions must be taken up
Promoting Climate friendly technologies:
Enhanced innovation (R & D) – mainly in energy & transport systems
Bringing them closer to market and developing world
Market based instruments should continue:
Simplified procedures for EU – ETS, JI and CDM needs to be developed
Nuclear Power should remain excluded
No time gap between commitment periods
Adaptation to be given more focus:
More resources to be allocated in the EU
Poorest and worst affected countries should be financially supported.
Source: Communication of the European Communities COM(2005)35 & COM(2007)2.
European Parliament Resolution on Climate Change; P6_TA(2007)0038, Feb, 2007.
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 14
Post 2012 German Position
An ambitious and robust post 2012 regime, involving all parties to start
by 2007, reaching an agreement by 2009
Emission Reduction Commitments:
Germany taken up commitment of 21% GHG emission reduction by 2012
Ready to take up more ambitious reduction targets (if EU takes up 30% by 2020,
Germany will take 40%.)
Other industrialized nations need to take up comparable reduction targets
Not asking for reduction commitments from developing countries but there needs to be
a way to decouple their emissions from economic development.
Technology Transfer:
Promote and enhance technology transfer
Joint initiative for renewables in rural areas of developing world
Adaptation:
Step up our efforts to assist developing countries to adapt (25 M Euros to GEF)
Mitigation:
Benefits of CDM must reach to all regions of the developing world (Africa)
Source: Statement of Germany at COP12
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 15
India’s Expectations
Adaptation Fund:
Very modest funds for developing countries
Speed up the process of operationalising Adaptation Fund.
Other Flexible mechanisms (JI & ETS) should contribute to Adaptation fund, not just
CDM.
GEF needs to streamline its procedures
Emission Reductions:
Little has been done by Annex-1 countries in curtailing their GHG emissions.
Developing countries cannot be forced to take up any commitments post 2012.
Technology Transfer:
Technology Transfer has been very slow, need to speed up.
Market based mechanism:
Flexible, fair, effective and simplified global framework
Comprehensive Agreement:
Means for Adaptation
Enhanced technological cooperation
Enhanced financing
Source: Statement of India at COP 12,
G8 + 5 Summit at Heiligendamm, 2007
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 16
Common Vision:
Deeper quantified emission reduction commitments of
Annex I countries;
Expand and strengthen the carbon market
High priority to
»Adaptation – strategies and measures
»Technology transfer and deployment,
»Financing.
Speed up the processes
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 17
Role of a Developed Country in preparing
developing countries to meet the challenge
of Climate Change
Awareness raising of common man
Developing the capacity of Rural poor
Providing alternative livelihoods to the Rural poor
Facilitate exchange of Information & Knowledge (South –
South and North – South)
Piloting of Adaptation projects
Engaging the policymakers at all levels
Generous financial support
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 18
THANK YOU
FOR YOUR ATTENTION !
Ms. Pamposh Bhat
Director, Climate Change Unit
German Technical Cooperation GTZ
B – 5/1 Safdurjung Enclave
New Delhi, 110029, India
Tel: + 91 11 46027617-19, Fax: + 91 11 46027620
Email: pamposh.bhat@gtz.de, pbhat@cdmindia.com
Ms. Pamposh Bhat 10.02.2010 Page
Seite 19
Related docs
Get documents about "