# ch16

Document Sample

```					Mechanical Engineers’ Handbook: Materials and Mechanical Design, Volume 1, Third Edition. Edited by Myer Kutz Copyright  2006 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

CHAPTER 16 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD
Tarek I. Zohdi
Mechanical Engineering Department University of California Berkeley, California

1 2 3 4 5 6

DEFORMATION OF A SOLID EQUILIBRIUM

558 560

8 9

DIFFERENTIAL PROPERTIES OF SHAPE FUNCTIONS DIFFERENTIATION IN REFERENTIAL COORDINATES POSTPROCESSING ONE-DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLE SUMMARY REFERENCES

570 572 575 576 579 580

INFINITESIMAL LINEARLY ELASTIC CONSTITUTIVE LAWS 562 10 FOUNDATIONS OF THE FINITEELEMENT METHOD 565 HILBERTIAN SOBOLEV SPACES 566 12 FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION IN THREE DIMENSIONS GLOBAL / LOCAL TRANSFORMATIONS 567 569 11

7

The ﬁnite-element method (FEM), which has become a dominant numerical method in mathematical physics, applied mathematics, and engineering analysis, is a huge ﬁeld of study. This chapter is intended to provide a concise review of basic ﬁeld equations in solid mechanics and then illustrate how the FEM can be employed to solve them. The implementation, theory, and application of FEM is a subject of immense literature. We will not attempt to review this huge ﬁeld. To motivate the use of the FEM, we derive the classical equations of mechanical equilibrium. Throughout this analysis, boldface symbols imply vectors or tensors. The inner product of two vectors u and v is denoted u v. At the risk of oversimpliﬁcation, we ignore the distinction between second-order tensors and matrices. Furthermore, we exclusively employ a Cartesian basis. Readers may consult the texts of Malvern1 and Marsden and Hughes2 for more background information. Hence, if we consider the second-order tensor A with its matrix representation [A]
def

A11 A12 A13 A21 A22 A23 A31 A32 A33

(1)

then the product of two second-order tensors A B is deﬁned by the matrix product [A][B], with components of AijBjk Cik. The second-order inner product of two tensors or matrices

557

558

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method is A : B AijBij tr([A]T [B]). Finally, the divergence of a vector u is deﬁned by u ui,i; whereas for a second-order tensor A, A describes a contraction to a vector with components Aij,j.

1

DEFORMATION OF A SOLID
The term deformation refers to a change in the shape of the continuum between a reference conﬁguration and current conﬁguration. In the reference conﬁguration, a representative particle of the continuum occupies a point P in space and has the position vector X X1e1 X2e2 X3e3 (Fig. 1), where (e1, e2, e3) is a Cartesian reference triad and X1, X2, X3 (with center O) can be thought of as labels for the point. Sometimes the coordinates or labels (X1, X2, X3, t) are called the referential coordinates. In the current conﬁguration the particle originally located at point P is located at point P and can be expressed also in terms of another position vector x, with the coordinates (x1, x2, x3, t). These are called the current coordinates. It is obvious with this arrangement that the displacement is u x X for a point originally at X and with ﬁnal coordinates x. When a continuum undergoes deformation (or ﬂow), its points move along various paths in space. This motion may be expressed by x(X1, X2, X3, t) u(X1, X2, X3, t) X(X1, X2, X3, t), which gives the present location of a point that occupied the position (X1, X2, X3, t) at time t t0, written in terms of the labels X1, X2, X3. The previous position vector may be interpreted as a mapping of the initial conﬁguration onto the current conﬁguration. In classical approaches, it is assumed that such a mapping is one to one and continuous, with continuous partial derivatives to whatever order that is required. The description of motion or deformation expressed previously is known as the Lagrangian formulation. Alternatively, if the independent variables are the coordinates x and t, then x(x1, x2, x3, t) u(x1, x2, x3, t) X(x1, x2, x3, t), and the formulation is denoted as Eulerian (Fig. 1). Partial differentiation of the displacement vector u x X produces the following displacement gradients: Xu F 1 and xu 1 F, where

Figure 1 Different descriptions of a deforming body.

1 x1 X1 x2 X1 x3 X1 X1 x1 X2 x1 X3 x1 x1 X2 x2 X2 x3 X2 X1 x2 X2 x2 X3 x2

Deformation of a Solid x1 X3 x2 X3 x3 X3 X1 x3 X2 x3 X3 x3

559

X

x

def

x X

F

def

(2)

x

X

def

X x

F

def

(3)

where F is known as the material deformation gradient and F is known as the spatial deformation gradient. Now, consider the length of a differential element in the reference conﬁguration d X and dx in the current conﬁguration, dx F d X. Taking the Xx d X difference in the magnitudes of these elements yields dx dx dX dX (
X

x d X) (

X

x d X)
def

dX dX 2 dX E dX

(4)

d X (FT F Alternatively, we have with d X dx dx dX dX
x

1) d X

X dx dx dx dx (1

F dx and ( xX dx) ( xX dx) F F) dx
T def

(5)

2 dx L dx

Therefore we have the so-called Lagrangian strain tensor E
def 1 –(FT F 2

1)

1 –[ 2

X

u

(

X

u)T

(

X

u)T

X

u]

(6)

Frequently, the Lagrangian strain tensor is deﬁned in terms of the so-called right Cauchy– def 1 –(C 1), C FT F. The Eulerian strain tensor is deﬁned as Green strain, E 2 L
def 1 –(1 2

FT F)

1 –[ 2

x

u

( xu)T

( xu)T

x

u]

(7)

In a similar manner as for the Lagrangian strain tensor, the Eulerian strain tensor can be def 1 –(1 b 1), b F FT. deﬁned in terms of the so-called left Cauchy–Green strain, L 2 REMARK. It should be clear that dx can be reinterpreted as the result of a mapping F d X → dx, or a change in conﬁguration (reference to current), while F dx → d X maps the current to the reference system. For the deformations to be invertible and physically realizable, F (F d X) d X and F (F dx) dx. We note that (det F)(det F) 1 and the following obvious relation ( X / x) ( x / X) F F 1. It should be clear that F F 1. We now employ inﬁnitesimal deformation theory. In inﬁnitesimal deformation theory, the displacement gradient components being ‘‘small’’ implies that higher order terms like 1 ( Xu)T Xu and ( xu)T xu can be neglected in the strain measure L – [ xu ( xu)T 2 def 1 1 T T T E – ( Xu –[ xu ( xu) xu] and E ( Xu) ( Xu) Xu], leading to L 2 2 def 1 T L T –[ Xu ( xu) ] and E ( Xu) ]. If the displacement gradients are small compared 2 with unity, E and L coincide closely to L and E, respectively. If we assume that / X

560

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method / x, we may use E or L interchangeably. Usually is the symbol used for inﬁnitesimal strains. Furthermore, to avoid confusion, when using models employing the geometrically linear inﬁnitesimal strain assumption, we use the symbol of with no X or x subscript. REMARK. The Jacobian of the deformation gradient, F, is deﬁned as x1 X1 x2 X1 x3 X1 x1 X2 x2 X2 x3 X2 x1 X3 x2 X3 x3 X3

J

def

det F

(8)

To interpret the Jacobian in a physical way, consider a reference differential volume given by dS3 d , where d X(1) dSe1, d X(2) dSe2, and d X(3) dSe3. The current differential element is described by dx(1) ( xk / X1) dSek, dx(2) ( xk / X2) dSek, and dx(3) ( xk / X3) dSek, where i is a unit vector and x1 X1 x1 X2 x1 X3 x2 X1 x2 X2 x2 X3 x3 X1 x3 dS3 X2 x3 X3

dx(1) (dx(2)
def

dx(3))

d

(1) (1) dx(1) dx2 dx3 1 (2) (2) (2) dx1 dx2 dx3 (3) (3) dx(3) dx2 dx3 1

(9)

Therefore, d J d 0. Thus, the Jacobian of the deformation gradient must remain positive deﬁnite; otherwise we obtain physically impossible ‘‘negative’’ volumes.

2

EQUILIBRIUM
We start with the following postulated balance law for an arbitrary part of a body around a point P, with boundary : t da
surface forces

,

,

fd
body forces

d dt

ud ˙

(10)

inertial forces

where is the material density, b is the body force per unit mass (f b), and u is the ˙ time derivative of the displacement. When the actual molecular structure is considered on a submicroscopic scale, the force densities, t, which we commonly refer to as ‘‘surface forces,’’ are taken to involve short-range intermolecular forces. Tacitly we assume that the effects of radiative forces, and others which do not require momentum transfer through a continuum, are negligible. This is a so-called local action postulate. As long as the volume element is large, our resultant body and surface forces may be interpreted as sums of these intermolecular forces. When we pass to larger scales, we can justiﬁably use the continuum concept. Now consider a tetrahedron in equilibrium, as shown in Fig. 2. From Newton’s laws, t(n) A(n) t(1) A(1) t(2) A(2) t(3) A(3) f u, where A(n) is the surface ¨ area of the face of the tetrahedron with normal n and is the tetrahedron volume. Clearly, as the distance between the tetrahedron base [located at (0,0,0)] and the surface center, denoted h, goes to zero, we have h → 0 ⇒ A(n) → 0 ⇒ / A(n) → 0. Geometrically, we def (i) (n) (n) (1) have A / A cos(xi, xn) ni, and therefore t t cos(x1, xn) t(2) cos(x2, xn)

2

Equilibrium

561

Figure 2 Cauchy tetrahedron: a ‘‘sectioned material point.’’

t(3) cos(x3, xn) 0. It is clear that forces on the surface areas could be decomposed into three linearly independent components. It is convenient to express the concept of stress at a point, representing the surface forces there, pictorially represented by a cube surrounding a point. The fundamental issue that must be resolved is the characterization of these surface forces. We can represent the force density vector, the so-called traction, on a surface by the def component representation: t(i) ( i1, i2, i3)T, where the second index represents the direction of the component and the ﬁrst index represents the normal to the corresponding coordinate plane. From this point forth, we will drop the superscript notation of t(n), where def T it is implicit that t t(n) n or explicitly
T 11 12 22 32 13 23 33

t(n)

t(1)n1

t(2)n2

t(3)n3

T

n

21 31

n1 n2 n3

(11)

where is the so-called Cauchy stress tensor.* Substitution of Eq. (11) into Eq. (10) yields ( n da
surface forces

) d dt ud ˙ (12)

fd
body forces

inertial forces

A relationship can be determined between the densities in the current and reference conﬁgurations, d Jd 0 d . Therefore, the Jacobian can also be interpreted 0 0 as the ratio of material densities at a point. Since the volume is arbitrary, we can assume that J 0 holds at every point in the body. Therefore, we may write d ( ) dt 0 d ( J) dt 0

when the system is mass conservative over time. This leads to writing the last term in Eq. (12) as
* Some authors follow the notation of the ﬁrst index representing the direction of the component and def the second index representing the normal to corresponding coordinate plane. This leads to t t(n) n. In the absence of couple stresses, a balance of angular momentum implies a symmetry of stress, T , and thus the difference in notations becomes immaterial.

562

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method d dt ud ˙
0

d( J) ud ˙ dt

0

ud ¨

ud ¨

From Gauss’s divergence theorem and an implicit assumption that is differentiable, we have ( x f u) d ¨ 0. If the volume is argued as being arbitrary, then the relation in the integral must hold pointwise, yielding
x

f

u ¨

(13)

Note: Invoking an angular momentum balance, under the assumptions that no inﬁnitesimal ‘‘micromoments’’ or so-called couple stresses exist, it can be shown that the stress tensor must be symmetric,1 i.e., x t da x fd d dt x ud ˙

which implies T . It is somewhat easier to consider a differential element, such as in Fig. 3, and to simply sum moments about the center. Doing this one immediately obtains 12 21, 23 32, and 13 31. Therefore
11 12 22 32 13 23 33

t(n)

t(1)n1

t(2)n2

t(3)n3

n

21 31

n1 n2 n3

T

n

(14)

3

INFINITESIMAL LINEARLY ELASTIC CONSTITUTIVE LAWS
The fundamental mechanism that produces forces in elastic deformation is the stretching of atomic bonds. If the deformations are small, then one can argue that we are dealing with only the linear portion of the response. Ultimately, this allows us to usually use linear relationships for models relating forces to deformations. The usual procedure to determine tensile properties of materials is to place samples of material in testing machines, apply the loads, and then measure the resulting deformations, such as lengths and changes in diameter in a portion of the specimen, of circular cross section, called the gage length. The location of the gage length is away from the attachments to the testing machine. The ends where the samples are attached to the machine are larger so that failure will not occur there ﬁrst, which

Figure 3 Stress at a point.

3

Inﬁnitesimal Linearly Elastic Constitutive Laws

563

would ruin the experimental measurements. Slow rates of deformation are applied, and the response is usually measured with strain gauges or extensometers. For a metal, samples are usually 1.25 cm in diameter and 5 cm in length. The immediate result of a tension test is the axial force (F) divided by the original area def (A0), denoted, loosely speaking, the ‘‘stress,’’ and change in length ( L L L0) per unit length ( 0), or ‘‘engineering strain,’’ measured by strain gauges. As a ﬁrst approximation we deﬁne the tensile stiffness of the material, known as Young’s modulus, denoted E, by def def F / A0 E ( L / L) E 0. As we know, the terms 0 and 0 are, strictly speaking, not 0 the true stress and strain, but simply serve our presentation purposes. Clearly, what we have presented is somewhat ad hoc; therefore, next we present the classical theory of isotropic elastic material responses for three-dimensional states of stress and strain. We now discuss relationships between the stress and strain, so-called material laws or constitutive relations for geometrically linear problems (inﬁnitesimal deformations).* The starting point to develop a constitutive theory is to assume a stored elastic energy function exists, a function denoted W, which depends only on the mechanical deformation. The sim1 plest function that fulﬁlls W/ is W – : : . Such a function satisﬁes the intuitive 2 physical requirement that, for any small strain from an undeformed state, energy must be stored in the material. Alternatively, a small-strain material law can be derived from 1 – : : W/ and W c0 c1 : , which implies c1 : . We 2 are free to set c0 0 (it is arbitrary) to have zero strain energy at zero strain, and furthermore we assume that no stresses exist in the reference state (c1 0); we obtain the familiar relation : . This is a linear (tensorial) relation between stresses and strains. The existence of a strictly positive stored energy function at the reference conﬁguration implies that the linear elasticity tensor must have positive eigenvalues at every point in the body. Typically, different materials are classiﬁed according to the number of independent constants in . A general material has 81 independent constants, since it is a fourth-order tensor relating nine components of stress to strain. However, the number of constants can be reduced to 36 since the stress and strain tensors are symmetric. This is easily seen from the matrix representation of :
11 22 33 12 23 31
def

E1111 E2211 E3311 E1211 E2311 E1311

E1122 E2222 E3322 E1222 E2322 E1322

E1133 E2233 E3333 E1233 E2333 E1333
def

E1112 E2212 E3312 E1212 E2312 E1312
[ ]

E1123 E2223 E3323 E1223 E2323 E1323

E1113 E2213 E3313 E1213 E2313 E1313

11 22 33

2 2 2
def

(15)

12 23 31

{ }

{ }

The symbol [ ] is used to indicate standard matrix notation equivalent to a tensor form, while { } to indicate vector representation. The existence of a scalar energy function forces to 1 1 – ( : : )T be symmetric since the strains are symmetric, in other words W – : : 2 2 1 T T T 1 T T – : – : : : , which implies . Consequently, has only 21 free 2 2 constants. The nonnegativity of W imposes the restriction that remain positive deﬁnite. At this point, based on many factors that depend on the material microstructure, it can be shown that the components of may be written in terms of anywhere between 21 and 2 independent parameters. Speciﬁcally, if there are an inﬁnite number of planes where the material prop-

* Furthermore, we neglect all thermal effects.

564

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method erties are equal in all directions, there are two free constants, the Lame parameters, and the ´ material is of the familiar isotropic variety. An isotropic body has material properties that are the same in every direction at a point in the body, i.e., the properties are not a function of orientation at a point in a body. Accordingly, for isotropic materials, with two planes of symmetry and an inﬁnite number of planes of directional independence (two free constants),
4 – 3 2 – 3 2 – 3 2 – 3 4 – 3 2 – 3 2 – 3 2 – 3 4 – 3

def

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 In this case we have : 3 tr 1 3 2

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

(16)

⇒

:

:

9

tr 3

2

2

:

(17)

1 –(tr )1. The eigenvalues of an isotropic elasticity tensor are where tr ii and 3 (3 , 2 , 2 , , , ). Therefore, we must have 0 and 0 to retain positive deﬁniteness of . It is sometimes important to split inﬁnitesimal strains into two physically meaningful parts (tr / 3) 1 [ (tr / 3) 1]. The Jacobian, J, of the deformation gradient F is det(1 det F det(1 1 tr Xu Xu) and can be expanded as J Xu) O( Xu) 1 tr , and therefore with inﬁnitesimal strains (1 tr ) d 0 d ⇒ tr (d d 0) / d 0. Hence, tr is associated with the volumetric part of the deformation. Furthermore, since tr[ (tr / 3) 1] 0, the so-called strain deviator can only affect the shape of a differential element. In other words, it describes distortion in the material. The stress can be split into two parts (dilatational and a deviatoric part): (tr def / 3) 1 [ (tr / 3) 1] p1 , where we call the symbol p the hydrostatic pressure and the stress deviator. This is one form of Hooke’s law. The resistance to change in the volume is measured by . We note that [(tr / 3) 1] 0, which indicates that this part of the stress produces no distortion. Another fundamental form of Hooke’s law is

E 1 1 2

tr 1

which implies [(1 ) / E] ( / E) tr 1. To interpret the constants, consider a uniaxial test where 12 0 ⇒ 12 0, 22 0. Under 13 23 13 23 33 these conditions we have 11 E 11 and 22 33 11. Therefore, Young’s modulus E is the ratio of the uniaxial stress to the corresponding strain component. The Poisson ratio is the ratio of the transverse strains to the uniaxial strain. Another commonly used set of stress–strain forms are the Lame relations, ´ tr 1 2 or tr 1

2 (3

2 )

2
12 13 23

To interpret the constants, consider a pressure test where 22 33. Under these conditions we have

0 and

11

4 2 3 E 3(1 2 )

Foundations of the Finite-Element Method E 2(1 ) 2(1 3(1 ) 2 )

565

1 We observe that / → , which implies that → –, and / → 0 implies → 1. 2 Therefore, from the fact that both and must be positive and ﬁnite, this implies 1 0.5 and 0 E . For example, some polymeric foams exhibit 0, steels 0.3, and some forms of rubber have → 0.5. However, no restrictions arise on , i.e., it could be positive or negative.

4

FOUNDATIONS OF THE FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD
In most problems of mathematical physics the true solutions are nonsmooth, i.e., not continuously differentiable. For example, in the equation of static mechanical equilibrium,* f 0 (18)

is differentiable in the classical sense. there is an implicit requirement that the stress Virtually the same mathematical structure holds for other partial differential equations of mathematical physics describing diffusion, heat conduction, etc. In many applications, differentiability is too strong a requirement. Therefore, when solving such problems we have two options: (1) enforcement of jump conditions at every interface or (2) weak formulations (weakening the regularity requirements). Weak forms, which are designed to accommodate irregular data and solutions, are usually preferred. Numerical techniques employing weak forms, such as the FEM, have been developed with the essential property that whenever a smooth classical solution exists, it is also a solution to the weak-form problem. Therefore, we lose nothing by reformulating a problem in a weaker way. The FEM starts by rewriting the ﬁeld equations in so-called ‘‘weak form.’’ To derive a direct weak form for a body, we take the equilibrium equations (denoted the strong form) and form a scalar product with an arbitrary smooth vector-valued function v and integrate f) v d r vd 0, where r is called the residual. We call over the body, ( def v a ‘‘test’’ function. If we were to add a condition that we do this for all ( ∀) possible test functions, then ( f) v d r vd 0 ∀v implies r 0. Therefore, if every f 0 on any ﬁnite region in . possible test function was considered, then r Consequently, the weak and strong statements would be equivalent provided the true solution is smooth enough to have a strong solution. Clearly, r can never be zero over any ﬁnite region in the body, because the test function will ‘‘ﬁnd’’ them. Using the product rule of ( ) v v : leads to, ∀v, ( ( v) v : )d differentiation, ( v) f vd 0, where we choose the v from an admissible set, to be discussed momentarily. v: d f vd n v dA, Using the divergence theorem leads to, ∀v, v: d f vd t v dA. If we decide to restrict our choices which leads to t of v’s to those such that v u 0, we have, where d is the applied boundary displacement on u, for inﬁnitesimal strain linear elasticity,

* Here f are the body forces.

566

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method Find u, u v:
def

u

d such that, ∀v, v f vd

u

0: t v dA
t

: ud

B(u,v)

def

F(v)

(19)

This is called a weak form because it does not require the differentiability of the stress . In other words, the differentiability requirements have been weakened. It is clear that we are able to consider problems with quite irregular solutions. We observe that if we test the solution with all possible test functions of sufﬁcient smoothness, then the weak solution is equivalent to the strong solution. We emphasize that provided the true solution is smooth enough, the weak and strong forms are equivalent, which can be seen by the above constructive derivation.

5

HILBERTIAN SOBOLEV SPACES
A key question is the selection of the sets of functions in the weak form. Somewhat naively, the answer is simple, the integrals must remain ﬁnite. Therefore the following restrictions hold (∀v), f v d , n v d and v : d , and govern the selection of the approximation spaces. These relations simply mean that the functions must be square integrable. To make precise statements, one must have a method of book keeping. Such a system is to employ so-called Hilbertian Sobolev spaces. We recall that a norm has three main characteristics for any vectors u and v such that u and v and (1) u 0, u 0 if and only if u 0, (2) u v u v , and (3) u u , where is a scalar. Certain types of norms, so-called Hilbert space norms, are frequently used in solid mechanics. Following standard notation, we denote H1( ) as the usual space of scalar functions with generalized partial derivatives of order 1 in L2( ), i.e., square integrable, in other words u We deﬁne H1( ) in H1( ), i.e., u H1( )
def

if

u

2 H1( )

def

u u d xj xj

uu d

[H1( )]3 as the space of vector-valued functions whose components are
2 H1( ) def

H1( )
def

if

u

ui ui d xj xj

uiui d

(20)

and we denote L2( ) [L2( )]3. Using these deﬁnitions, a complete boundary value problem can be written as follows. The data (loads) are assumed to be such that f L2( ) and t L2( t), but less smooth data can be considered without complications. Implicitly we require that u H1( ) and L2( ) without continually making such references. Therefore, in summary, we assume that our solutions obey these restrictions, leading to the following inﬁnitesimal strain linear elasticity weak form: Find u v: H1( ), u : ud
u

d, such that, ∀v f vd
t

H1( ), v

u

0: (21)

t v dA

6

Finite-Element Formulation in Three Dimensions

567

We note that if the data in (21) are smooth and if (21) possesses a solution u that is sufﬁciently regular, then u is the solution of the classical linear elastostatic problem in strong form:

( : u)

f u

0, d t

x x x
u

(22)

( : u) n

t

6

FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION IN THREE DIMENSIONS
Consider the following general form:

Find u

H1( ) such that, ∀v v: : ud f vd

H1( ), (23) t v dA
t

It is convenient to write the bilinear form in the following (matrix) manner: ([D]{v})T[ ]([D]{u}) d where [D], the deformation tensor, is {v}T{f} d
t

{v}T{t} dA

(24)

x1 0
def

0 x2 0 x1 x3 0

0 0 x3 0 x2 x1
def

0 x2 0 x3

[D]

{u}

u1 u2 u3

{f}

def

f1 f2 f3

{t}

def

t1 t2 t3

(25)

It is clear that in an implementation of the FEM, the sparsity of D should be taken into account. It is also convenient to write

568

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method

N h u1(x1, x2, x3) i 1 N h u2(x1, x2, x3) i 1 N h u3(x1, x2, x3) i 1

ai i(x1, x2, x3)

ai

N

i

(x1, x2, x3)

(26)

ai

2N

i

(x1, x2, x3)

or {uh}
def

[ ]{a}, where, for example, for trilinear shape functions
1 2 3 4 5 6 N 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 3 4 5 6 N 1

[ ]

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 3 4 5 6 N

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(27) where uh is the discrete (approximate) solution. It is advantageous to write

{a}

def

a1 a2 a3

{ i}

def

i

0 0

{ i}

def

0
i

{ i}

def

0 0
i

0
for N 1 i 2N

(28)

for 1 i N

for 2N 1 i 3N

a3N
N and {uh} i 1 ai{ i}. If we choose v with the same basis but a different linear combination {v} [ ]{b}, then we may write

([D][ ]{b})T[ ]([D][ ]{a}) d
{b}T[K]{a} stiffness

([ ]{b})T{f} d
t

([ ]{b})T{t} dA

(29)

Since {b} is arbitrary, i.e., the weak statement implies ∀v ⇒ ∀{b}, therefore {b}T{[K]{a} {R}} [K] {R}
def def

0 ⇒ [K]{a}
T

{R} (30)

([D][ ]) [ ]([D][ ]) d [ ] {f} d
T
t

[ ] {t} dA

T

This is the system of equations that is to be solved.

7

Global / Local Transformations

569

7

GLOBAL/LOCAL TRANSFORMATIONS
One strength of the FEM is that most of the computations can be done in an element-byelement manner. We deﬁne the entries of [K], Kij and Ri [ i]T{f} d
t

([D][ i])T[ ]([D][ j]) d

(31)

[ i]T{t} dA
e

(32)

Breaking the calculations into elements, Kij Ke ij
e

Ke , where ij (33)

([D][ i])T[ ]([D][ j]) d

To make the calculations systematic, we wish to use the generic or master element deﬁned in a local coordinate system ( 1, 2, 3) (Fig. 4). Accordingly, we need the following mapping functions, from the master coordinates to the real space coordinates, M : (x1, x2, x3) → ( 1, 2, 3) (for example, trilinear bricks):
8

x1
i 1 8

X1i ˆ i X2i ˆ i
i 1 8

def

Mx1( 1, Mx2( 1, Mx3( 1,

2

, , ,

3

) ) )

x2 x3
i 1

def

2

3

(34)

X3i ˆ i

def

2

3

Figure 4 Two-dimensional ﬁnite-element mapping.

570

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method where (X1i, X2i, X3i) are true spatial coordinates of the ith node and where ˆ ( 1, 2, 3) (x1( 1, 2, 3), x2( 1, 2, 3), x3( 1, 2, 3)). These types of mappings are usually termed parametric maps. If the polynomial order of the shape functions is as high as the element, it is an isoparametric map; lower, then a subparametric map; higher, then a superparametric map.
def

8

DIFFERENTIAL PROPERTIES OF SHAPE FUNCTIONS
The master element shape functions form a nodal base of trilinear approximation given by
ˆ1 ˆ3 ˆ5 ˆ7
1 –(1 8 1 –(1 8 1 –(1 8 1 –(1 8

1

)(1 )(1 )(1 )(1

2

)(1 )(1 )(1 )(1

3

) ) ) )

ˆ2 ˆ4 ˆ6 ˆ8

1 –(1 8 1 –(1 8 1 –(1 8 1 –(1 8

1

)(1 )(1 )(1 )(1

2

)(1 )(1 )(1 )(1

3

) ) ) ) (35)

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

• For trilinear elements we have a nodal basis consisting of 8 nodes, and since it is

vector valued, 24 total degrees of freedom, or three shape functions for each node. See Fig. 5. • For triquadratic elements we have a nodal basis consisting of 27 nodes, and since it is vector valued, 81 total degrees of freedom, or three shape functions for each node. The nodal shape functions can be derived quite easily by realizing that it is a nodal basis, e.g., they are unity at the corresponding node and zero at all other nodes. We note that the i’s are never really computed; we actually start with the ˆ i’s. Therefore in the stiffness matrix and right-hand-side element calculations, all terms must be deﬁned in terms of the local coordinates. With this in mind we lay down some fundamental relations, which are directly related to the concepts of deformation presented in our discussion in continuum mechanics. It is not surprising that a deformation gradient reappears in the following form:

Figure 5 Trilinear hexahedron or ‘‘brick.’’

8

Differential Properties of Shape Functions x1
1

571

x1
2

x1
3

F

def

x(x1, x2, x3) ( 1, 2, 3)

where

F

def

x2
1

x2
2

x2
3

(36)

x3
1

x3
2

x3
3

The corresponding determinant is F x1
1

x2 x3
2 3

x3 x2
2 3

x1
2

x2 x3
1 3

x3 x2
1 3

x1
3

x2 x3
1 2

x3 x2
1 2

(37) The differential relations
→ x are

x1
1

x2 x2 x2 x2
1

x3 x3 x3 x3
1

x1 x1 x1

1

x1
2 2

x2
2

x3
2

(38)

x1
3 3

x2
3

x3
3

The inverse differential relations x →

are

1

2 2

3 3

x1 x2 x3 and

1

x1
1

x1
2

x1
3

1

x2
1

2

x2
2

3

x2
3

(39)

1

x3

2

x3

3

x3

x1 dx1 dx2 dx3
1

x1
2

x1
3

x2
1

x2
2

x2
3

x3
1

x3
2

x3
3

d d d

1 2 3

(40)

and the inverse form

572

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method
1 1 1

d d d

x1
1 2 3 2

x2
2

x3
2

x1
3

x2
3

x3
3

dx1 dx2 dx3

(41)

x1 Noting the following relationship F where x2 x3
2 3 1

x2

x3

where

def

A11 A12 A13 A21 A22 A23 A31 A32 A33

T

(42)

A11 A13 A22 A31 A33

x3 x2
2 3

F F F F F

1

x1
3

A12 A21 A23 A32

x2 x3
1 3

x3 x2
1 3

F F F F

2

x1
1

x2 x3
1 2

x3 x2
1 2

x1 x3
2 3

x3 x1
2 3

x1
2

x2
3

x1 x3
1 3

x3 x1
1 3

x1 x3
1 2

x3 x1
1 2

x2
1

x2
2

x1 x2
2 3

x2 x1
2 3

x1 x2
1 3

x2 x1
1 3

x3
3

x3

x1 x2
1 2

x2 x1
1 2

x3 (43)

With these relations, one can then solve for the components of F and F 1.

9

DIFFERENTIATION IN REFERENTIAL COORDINATES
We now need to express [D] in terms of ( 1, [D( (x1, x2, x3))]
ˆ [D( ˆ (Mx1( 1,
2 2

,
3

3

) via
2

,

), Mx2( 1,

,

3

), Mx3( 1,

2

,

3

))]

(44)

ˆ Therefore we write for the ﬁrst column of [D]*

* This is for illustration purposes only. For computational efﬁciency, one should not program such operations in this way. Clearly, the needless multiplication of zeros is to be avoided.

9

Differentiation in Referential Coordinates

573

1 1

2 2

3 3

x1

x1

x1

0 0 (45)
1 1 2 2 3 3

x2

x2

x2

0
1 1 2 2 3 3

x3

x3

x3

for the second column

0
1 1 2 2 3 3

x2

x2

x2 (46)

0
1 1 2 2 3 3

x1
1

x1
2

x1
3

1

x3

2

x3

3

x3

0 and for the last column

0 0
1 1 2 2 3 3

x3

x3

x3

(47)

0
1 1 2 2 3 3

x2
1

x2
2

x2
3

1

x1

2

x1

3

x1

574

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method For an element, our shape function matrix ( shape functions; for the ﬁrst eight columns
ˆ1 ˆ2 ˆ3 ˆ4 ˆ5
def

[ ˆ ]) has the following form for linear
ˆ6 ˆ7 ˆ8

0 0 for the second eight columns 0
ˆ1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

(48)

0
ˆ2

0
ˆ3

0
ˆ4

0
ˆ5

0
ˆ6

0
ˆ7

0
ˆ8

(49)

0 and for the last eight columns 0 0
ˆ1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0
ˆ2

0 0
ˆ3

0 0
ˆ4

0 0
ˆ5

0 0
ˆ6

0 0
ˆ7

0 0
ˆ8

(50) 24 matrix of the

ˆ which in total is a 3 24 matrix. Therefore the product [D][ ˆ ] is a 6 form, for the ﬁrst eight columns ˆ1
1

1

ˆ1
2

2

ˆ1
3

x1

x1

3 , ...8 x1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ˆ1
1 1

ˆ1
2

2

ˆ1
3

(51)
3

x2

x2

x2

, ...8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ˆ1
1 1

ˆ1
2

2

ˆ1
3

x3

x3

3 , ...8 x3

and for the second eight columns

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ˆ1
1 1

ˆ1
2

2

ˆ1
3

x2

x2

3 , ...8 x2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ˆ1 ˆ1
1 1 1

ˆ1 ˆ1
2 2

2

ˆ1 ˆ1
3 3

(52)
3

x1
1

x1
2

x1

, ...8

x3

x3

3 , ...8 x3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,

10 and for the last eight columns

Postprocessing

575

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ˆ1
1 1

ˆ1
2

2

ˆ1
3

x3

x3

3 , ...8 x3

(53)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ˆ1 ˆ1
1 1 1

ˆ1 ˆ1
2 2

2

ˆ1 ˆ1
3 3

x2
1

x2
2

3 , ...8 x2 3 , ...8 x1

x1

x1

Finally with Gaussian quadrature for each element
g g g

Ke ij
q 1 r 1 s 1

ˆ ˆ wqwrws([D]{ ˆ i})T[ ˆ ]([D]{ ˆ j}) F
standard

(54)

and
g g g g g

Re i
q 1 r 1 s 1

wqwrws{ ˆ i}T{f} F
q 1 r 1 standard

wqwr[ ˆ i T{t} Fs
for
t e

(55)

0

where wq, wr, ws are Gauss weights and where Fs represents the (surface) Jacobians of element faces on the exterior surface of the body, where, depending on the surface on which it is to be evaluated, one of the components will be 1 or 1. These surface Jacobians can be evaluated in a variety of ways, for example, using the Nanson formulas frequently encountered in the ﬁeld of continuum mechanics.

10

POSTPROCESSING

Postprocessing for the stress, strain, and energy from the existing displacement solution, i.e., the values of the nodal displacements, the shape functions, is straightforward, namely, [D]{uh} { h}. Therefore, for each element

576

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method

x1
h 11 h 22 h 33 h 12 h 23 h 13

0 x2 0 x1 x3 0

0 0 x3 0 x2 x1
8

0 0 x2 0 x3

uh 1i
i 1 8

i

2 2 2

uh 2i
i 1 8

i

(56)

uh 3i
i 1

i

known values

where the global coordinates must be transformed to the master system in both the deformation tensor and the displacement representation. At each Gauss point, we add all eight contributions for each of the six components, then multiply by the corresponding nodal displacements that have previously been calculated. The following expressions must be evaluated at the Gauss points, multiplied by the appropriate weights and added together: uh 1 x1 uh 1 x2 uh 1 x3
8 h u1i i 1 8 h u1i i 1 8 h u1i i 1 i i i

x1 x2 x3

uh 2 x1 uh 2 x2 uh 2 x3

8 h u1i i 1 8 h u1i i 1 8 h u1i i 1 i i i

x1 x2 x3

uh 3 x1 uh 3 x2 uh 3 x3

8 h u1i i 1 8 h u1i i 1 8 h u1i i 1 i i i

x1 x2 x3 (57)

where uh denotes the x1 component of the displacement of the ith node. Combining the 1i numerical derivatives to form the strains we obtain h uh / x1, h uh / x2, and h 11 1 22 2 33 uh / x3 and 2 h uh / x2 uh / x1, 2 h uh / x3 uh / x2, and 2 h 3 12 12 1 2 23 23 2 3 13 uh / x 3 uh / x1. 13 1 3

11

ONE-DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLE
Consider the general form Find u H1( ) such that, ∀v ƒv dx
vt
t

H1( ), v

u

0, (58)

dv du E dx dx dx

It is convenient to write the bilinear form in the following manner: dv du E dx dx dx We write
vƒ dx vt
t

(59)

11
N

One-Dimensional Example

577
(60)

uh(x)
j 1

aj j(x)

If we choose v with the same basis but a different linear combination,
N

v(x)
i 1

bi i(x)

(61)

then we may write d dx
N

bi i(x) E
i 1

d dx

N

aj j(x) dx
j 1

{b}T{K}{a} stiffness N N

bi i(x) ƒ dx
i 1 body load i 1

bi i(x) t
t

(62)

Since the bi are arbitrary, i.e., the weak form implies ∀v ⇒ ∀bi, therefore
N N

bi
i 1 j 1

Kijaj

Ri Kij Ri
def

0 ⇒ [K]{a}

{R} (63)

d i d j E dx dx dx
i

def

ƒ dx

i

t

t

This is the system of equations that is to be solved. One strength of the FEM is that most of the computations can be done in an elementby-element manner. Accordingly, we deﬁne the entries of [K], Kij and Ri
i

d i d j E dx dx dx

(64)

ƒ dx

i

t

t

(65)

We can break the calculations into elements, Kij Ke ij
e

e

Ke , where ij (66)

d i d j E dx dx dx

To make the calculations systematic, we wish to use the generic or master element deﬁned in a local coordinate system ( ). Accordingly, we need the following mapping functions, from the master coordinates to the real space coordinates, M(x) → ( ) (Fig. 6):
2

x
i 1

Xi ˆ i

def

Mx( )

(67)

578

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method

Figure 6 One-dimensional linear ﬁnite-element mapping.

where the Xi are true spatial coordinates of the ith node and where ˆ ( ) (x( )). The master element shape functions form a nodal bases of linear approximation given by
ˆ
1 –(1 2

def

)

ˆ2

1 –(1 2

)

(68)

• For linear elements we have a nodal basis consisting of two nodes and thus two

degrees of freedom.
• The nodal shape functions can be derived quite easily by realizing that it is a nodal

basis, e.g., they are unity at the corresponding node and zero at all other nodes. We note that the i’s are never really computed; we actually start with the ˆ i’s and then map them into the actual problem domain. Therefore in the stiffness matrix and right-handside element calculations, all terms must be deﬁned in terms of the local coordinates. With this in mind, we introduce some fundamental quantities, such as the deformation gradient F The corresponding ‘‘determinant’’ is F d d The inverse differential relations x → are d dx We can now express d / dx in terms of d dx Finally with quadrature for each element
g def

dx d
→ x are

(69)

dx / d . The differential relations d dx dx d

(70)

d d d dx

(71)

via d (M( )) dx (72)

Ke ij
q 1

wq

d d d d ( i(M( )) E ( j(M( )) F d dx d dx
evaluated at
q

12 and
g

Summary

579

Rie
q 1

wq i(M( ))ƒ F
evaluated at
q

i

(M( ))t

evaluated on traction endpoints

where the wq are Gauss weights. Postprocessing for the stress, strain, and energy from the existing displacement solution, i.e., the values of the nodal displacements, the shape functions, is straightforward. Essentially the process is the same as the formation of the virtual energy in the system. Therefore, for each element du dx d dx
2

ai
i 1

i

d d

2

ai ˆ i
i 1

d dx

(73)

REMARKS. On the implementation level, the system of equations to be solved are [K]{uh} {R}, where the stiffness matrix is represented by K(I, J) k(ELEM, i, j), where I, J are the global entries and i, j are the local entries. Here a global / local index relation must be made to connect the local entry to the global entry when solution time begins. This is a relatively simple and efﬁcient storage system to encode. The element-by-element strategy has other advantages with regard to element-by-element system solvers. This is is trivial in one dimension; however, it can be extremely complicated in three dimensions. Major software exists which can automate these procedures. Some of the most widely used are:
• Abaqus, located at http: / / www.hks.com / • Adina, located at http: / / www.adina.com / • Ansys, located at http: / / www.ansys.com / • LS-Dyna, located at http: / / www.lstc.com / • Nastran, located at http: / / www.mscsoftware.com /

This is by no means a comprehensive list.

12

SUMMARY
Classical older techniques construct approximations from globally kinematically admissible functions. Two main obstacles arise: (1) It may be very difﬁcult to ﬁnd a kinematically admissible function over the entire domain and (2) if such functions are found, they lead to large, strongly coupled, and complicated systems of equations. These problems have been overcome by the fact that local approximations, i.e., over a very small portion of the domain, are possible that deliver adequate solutions and simultaneously lead to systems of equations which have an advantageous structure amenable to large-scale computation by high-speed computers. This piecewise or ‘‘elementwise’’ approximation technique was recognized at least 60 years ago by Courant3. There have been a variety of such approximation methods to solve equations of mathematical physics. The most popular is the ﬁnite-element method. The central feature of the method is to reduce the ﬁeld equations in a physically sound and systematic manner to an assembly of discrete subdomains, or ‘‘elements.’’ The process is designed to keep the resulting algebraic systems as computationally manageable and memory efﬁcient as possible.

580

An Introduction to the Finite-Element Method The implementation, theory, and application of the FEM is a subject of immense literature. We have not attempted to review this huge ﬁeld. For general references on the subject see the standard books by Bathe,4 Becker et al.,5 Hughes,6 Szabo and Babuska,7 and Zienkiewicz and Taylor.8

REFERENCES
1. L. Malvern, Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1968. 2. J. E. Marsden, and T. J. R. Hughes, Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983. 3. R. Courant, ‘‘Variational Methods for the Solution of Problems of Equilibrium and Vibrations,’’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 49, 1–23 (1943). 4. K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996. 5. E. B. Becker, G. F. Carey, and J. T. Oden, Finite Elements: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980. 6. T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989. 7. B. Szabo, and I. Babuska, Finite Element Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1991. ´ 8. O. C. Zienkiewicz, and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method, Vols. I and II, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.

```
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
 views: 32 posted: 11/10/2008 language: English pages: 24
How are you planning on using Docstoc?