How do I treat bifurcation lesions

Reviews
Shared by: amberp
Stats
views:
36
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
11/6/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
How do I treat bifurcation lesions? Bifurcation Lesion Intervention • Bifurcation lesion intervention is performed in about 8-15% of PCI at most centers • Most of these lesions are complex (type C of ACC/AHA) • Technically challenging with higher learning curve • PCI of these lesions requires greater number of devices • PCI associated with higher MACE, higher restenosis, and higher SAT Bifurcation Lesion Intervention Issues • Plaque shift / displacement • Elastic lesion / recoil • Disparity in the size of the parent vessel and sidebranch Bifurcation Lesion Classification Duke’s Sidebranch involvement ? A B Prebranch C Postbranch Parent vessel only D Bifurcation E Ostial F Prebranch and ostial 1. Size of sidebranch 2. Presence of calcium 3. Angle with parent vessel Optimal Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions Short & Long-term Results Variable Angiographic appearance Acute complication Restenosis Technical challenge Stent of parent vessel & PTCA ( stent ) of sidebranch Debulking of parent vessel & S of side-branch Excellent for parent vessel, suboptimal for SBr 1-3% High for SBr + ++ +++ High for main Excellent 0-1% vessel Simple approach with a single stent at High Stent of parent vessel & Excellent 2-13% bifurcatio may be adequate in many subsets n S of side-branch Debulking+S of parent Excellent for High for vessel & 2-4% parent vessel  SBr PTCA of side-branch for SBr Debulking+S of parent vessel & Low for Excellent 1-5% both Debulking of side-branch ++++ +++++ The Bifurcation Study With Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Stent % 30 Segment Restenosis Stent+Stent Stent+PTCA 25 Total Restenosis p=0.20 20.3 20 Restenosis 10 10 5 0 2.3 1/44 3.1 11/44 2/20 2/64 13/64 1/20 Main branch Side branch Main Side branch Colombo et al. Circulation 2004;109:1244. Crush technique Bifurcation Lesion Intervention “Crushed” T-Stent Technique • Seems simple • Side branch may be difficult to recross • 30-day MACE rate of about 4-8% • Increased SAT Thrombosis rates according to selected patient characteristics 35 % 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Renal failure 29 Aspirin And Clopidogrel Stopped Prior Brachytherapy Bifurcation 8.7 5.5 3.5 Bifurc 3.2 LM 2.6 DM 1.3 UA *Iakovou et al JAMA 2005 Bifurcation Lesion Intervention “Crushed” T-Stent Technique • Seems simple • Side branch may be difficult to recross • 30-day MACE rate of about 4-8% • Increased SAT • Restenosis issues especially of the crushed sidebranch • 8-16% TLR which seems to be lower with final kissing balloon dilatation Main Branch Side Branch Bifurcation Lesion Intervention Using DES “Simultaneous Kissing Stent” (SKS) Technique Pre Post SKS Technique Bifurcation lesion involving LAD and Diagonal LAD Diagonal 1 or 2 stents? A) 2 stents The side branch is significantly diseased at its ostium or nearby, The side branch is sufficiently large to be stented, B) 1 stent in all other conditions and then evaluate Predilatation Baseline IVUS can suggest the need for predilatation and is helpful for strategy Dilate the side branch if critical Predilate if uncertain If no predilation of the side branch…continue to re-evaluate the side branch following main branch predilatation; dilate is side branch if compromised Case 2: Side branch management 74 yo wm with rest angina; troponin 1.0 Started on Plavix, Lovenox, Aspirin Bifurcations: Baseline Bifurcations: LAD stenting after LAD stenting Bifurcations: Kissing result after Kissing Bifurcations IVUS CSA : 3.4 mm2 FFR : 0.80 Result after Kissing Discrepancy between Angio & FFR FFR Angio Conclusions 1 stent, when possible, when 2 stents are needed… crush with kiss or V/SKS In complex bifurcations 2 stents as intention to treat Perform optimal dilatation of the side branch Always kissing balloon to end procedure Failure to deliver DES stent: Use other DES, BMS or balloon only Thrombosis is higher than in standard lesions Ostial disease with proximal involvement Ostial LAD with distal LM IVUS D1=4.0mm, D2=4.5mm Distal LM D1=2.9mm, D2=3.3mm Ostial LAD Baseline LCSA = 5.6 mm2 LCSA = 3.4 mm2 Ostial LAD with distal LM Result after stent implantation IVUS Cypher 3.5 x 33 mm Distal LM D1=3.3mm, D2=2.8mm Ostial LAD D1=3.2mm, D2=2.9mm LCSA = 7.6 mm2 LCSA = 7.0 mm2 Ostial LAD with distal LM Result after 2nd inflation IVUS Powersail 4.0x8 mm 26 atm D1=5.1, D2=4.4 mm Distal LM D1=4.0, D2=3.5 mm Ostial LAD 12306/05 LCSA = 10.9 mm2 LCSA = 8.9 mm2 Left Main Lesion Kissing Balloon Final Result

Related docs
How do I Treat Unprotected LM Disease
Views: 41  |  Downloads: 1
How-do-I-treat-a-case-of-wool-block
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
05. Lesions
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Lesions in Black Swans – New Condition
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
TREAT OR TRICK
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
“Trick or Treat“
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Other docs by amberp
OPEN LISTING REALTY AGREEMENT[1]
Views: 118  |  Downloads: 5
Test Plan
Views: 872  |  Downloads: 130
Missouri Compromise _1820_ - 2[1]
Views: 67  |  Downloads: 0
Support Plan
Views: 511  |  Downloads: 66
Lend-Lease Act _1941_ - 1[1]
Views: 56  |  Downloads: 0
Tennessee Valley Authority Act _1933_ - 2[1]
Views: 83  |  Downloads: 0
UNDERSTANDING REVERSE MERGERS[1]
Views: 137  |  Downloads: 6
Social Security Act _1935_ - 1[1]
Views: 45  |  Downloads: 0
FORM 1099INT INTEREST INCOME 2005
Views: 62  |  Downloads: 0
FORM 1099DIV DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS 2005
Views: 132  |  Downloads: 0
Wade-Davis Bill _1864_ - 2
Views: 84  |  Downloads: 0