From Open Source to long-term sustainability Review of Business
Document Sample


From Open Source to long-term sustainability:
Review of Business Models and Case Studies
Victor Chang, Hugo Mills, Steven
Newhouse, OMII-UK
10th September 2007, AHM 2007
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Content for this Presentation
• Motivation
• Introduction
• Software Business Models & Classifications
• Case Studies: Red Hat, MySQL, Apache,
XandrOS, OMII-UK & Business Model
Comparisons
• Special Case Studies
• Further Discussions
• Conclusion
• Questions and Answers
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Motivation
• Study successful methods of generating money/
revenues from open source projects.
• Review and Classify Open Source Business
Models.
• Achieve sustainability.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Introduction: OSS & Proprietary Software
• Open Source Software (OSS): • Proprietary Software:
- Source code is freely - Close Source.
available under a licence or
- Requirement payment
agreement.
for licences, software or
- allows users to study,
service.
change, and improve
software, and to redistribute
it in modified or unmodified • Popular models for
form. commercial firms such as
Microsoft, Adobe &
• Typical OSS projects criteria:
MATLAB.
(1) User Support and (2)
Development Activities.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Introduction: OSS Licences
• 50 OSS Licences and list 5 popular ones:
• The GNU General Public Licence (GPL)
• The GNU Lesser General Public Licence (LGPL)
• Modified BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution)
Licence / new BSD
• Apache Licence
• Mozilla Public Licence (MPL)
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Introduction: Sustainability
• A lot of academic projects die off.
• Essential for OSS projects.
• Definition for the paper:
- Long Term Maintenance of organisation,
particularly securing funding, resources,
operations and clients.
• How? We need to study and understand
business models.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Literature Review: Open Source Models by JISC
• (a) Community Model: Apache.
• (b) Subscription Model: SAKAI & Red Hat.
• (c) Commercial Model: proprietary software.
• (d) Central Support Model: OMII-UK.
- “A Central Body that provides robust releases
and support for open source products that are
of strategic importance to community”.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Literature Review: Commercial Models by
Forta & IDC
• Require a subscription fee of the product. Referred
as Product in the IDC Model.
• Sell paid-for services. Referred as Services in the
IDC Model.
• Selling intellectual properties or licences (Split-
Licencing). Referred as Resale in the IDC Model.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Literature Review: Commercial Models by
Forta & IDC
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Our Model Classifications
• Subscription & central model, can be regarded as one –
Support Contracts (Red Hat) based on different
business requirements.
• Split-Licencing (MySQL): Sale Licence.
• Each OSS organisation needs a Community (Apache).
• Valued-added Closed Source (XandrOS): proprietary.
• Macro R&D Infrastructure (OMII-UK): R&D based;
involved in high-level complexity challenges;
collaborations & partnership between local/international
institutes; come from government fund initially.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Support Contracts: Red Hat
• 24/7 service, 3 levels of support subscriptions.
• Obtain revenues from
- RHEL subscription per system or per server;
- Subscriptions from commercial open source
applications (JBoss et al)
- System/Architecture management services;
- Support services;
- Red Hat Certification & Training.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Business Model Comparisons: Support Contracts
• Advantages • Disadvantages
- Ensuring long-term sales - Customers may feel no need
and profits. to pay due to large amount of
free info.
- Provides a more - Needs to ensure a large
predictable & dependable number of users already
revenue. available.
- Easy for others to clone full
- Provides diff level of architecture & services,
support. Provides users having more competitions to
more options. deal with.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Split-Licencing: MySQL
• Offer both free & also commercial editions.
• Primarily obtain income from selling commercial
licence, allowing them to use product without
being restricted by GPL.
• Customers can include MySQL in their product
for resale.
• Suitable for firms not wishing to release source
code, or those not wishing to comply with GPL.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Business Model Comparisons: Split Licencing
• Advantages • Disadvantages
- Provides a high level - Could be confused
of flexibility for users & with boundary between
organisation. commercial or GPL
- Allows clients to licence under the same
customise software for product.
sales without licencing
restrictions. - If users switch to GPL
licence products, might
- If software include
popular enterprise reduce income. Less
ones, it could increase predictable for income.
sales & users.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Community: Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
• Apache HTTP server- 1994. ASF was started in
June 1999. Non-profit organisation.
• Decentralised community of developers.
• Apache Licence – similar to new BSD Licence.
• Largest OSS organisation along with Red Hat.
66.9 million sites using Apache web server.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Business Model Comparisons: Community
• Advantages • Disadvantages
- Backed up by large - Leading developers or
community effort, it can donators/investors may
become a main stream. influence its development
cycle and direction.
- Presented and appealed to a
wider range of users & firms.
- Find it difficult to sustain
and often request community
- Become a main component in donations.
the market such as Apache
HTTP, Tomcat, IBM Eclipse
etc.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Value-added Close Source: XandrOS
• Founded in 2001, to make easy-to-use Desktop
Linux.
• Earns income from business & educational
partners. Operating like Split-Licencing at the
beginning, then switching to this model in 2006.
Recent partnership with Microsoft.
• Characteristics: (a) Pay for software; pay for
service; attract investors & venture capitalists
(b) Add new proprietary software & improve
functionality.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Business Model Comparisons: Value-added
Close Source
• Advantages • Disadvantages
- Can receive additional - If failing to impress users,
funds from share, investor’s clients and investors, may
funds, sales commission, fail to sustain themselves.
retailers.
- Certainly not OSS
- May generate higher developers’ favourite.
revenues if targeting the
right market or products
(VoIP, gaming).
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Macro R&D Infrastructure
• R&D project. Come from • Traditional ways of
government funding initially. funding academic
projects.
Projects / organisations
• Can be viewed as a
Funding
Products & commercial model,
services
or commercial
operations.
Funders Positive Customers
feedback / Users
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Macro R&D Infrastructure: OMII-UK
• Founded in JAN 2006, partnership between
Southampton, Edinburgh and Manchester.
• Presents engineering/Grid challenges, integrating
15 components for solution-focused projects.
• Offers a secure, robust & fully integrated
Software Solutions for e-Research & e-Science.
• Involved in international partnership, community
expansion, research & development.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
OMII-UK e-Science Value Chain
Infrastructure Component Solution e-Science
Provider Provider Provider End User
OMII
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Business Model Comparisons: Macro R&D
Infrastructure
• Advantages • Disadvantages
- Attract funds if meeting a - Sustainability model is under
specialised area with high development & influenced by
demands. investors.
- Merge together to form a - Seek funding at regular intervals,
powerhouse in a specialised area creating a sense of instability and
to attract funding & expertise. insecurity at those periods.
- Create spin-offs to generate - Might be difficult to integrate
more revenues & research academic theories and industrial
outcomes, particularly for perspective in some
bioscience or medical or e- organisations.
Science R&D projects.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Special Case Studies: XenSource
• Move between business models.
• Hypervisor / virtualisation software.
• Before JAN 2005, Macro R&D + Community at
Cambridge.
• £23.5 M venture capital in JAN 2005.
• Provides Split Licencing Model: free OSS and
Enterprise version.
• Acquired by Citrix for $500M (£250M).
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Special Case Studies: National Computer
Systems, Singapore
• Dual Business Models. Started in 1981 as
Macro R&D Infrastructure.
• In 1996, became a close source model.
• Singapore Government as its main client.
• Partners with Singapore Telecom (£1.623 B
value). Overseas offices in 8 countries.
• Running support-contract and valued-added
close source model.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Special Case Studies: Sun and OpenJDK
• More commercial firms starting OSS projects.
• Advantages:
- Consolidate a stronger community;
- Build up a more robust, reliable & user-
oriented software.
• OpenJDK in 2006, under GPL Licence.
• IBM too – Eclipse, IBM JDK, Apache etc.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Discussions: Merger & Acquisitions (M&A)
• M&A: Useful business strategy & have a direct
impact on OSS organisations.
• SuSE: Acquired by Novell with $210M (£105 M)
in NOV 2003. Partnerships with IBM, AMD, ITV
& Microsoft.
• Novell’s Benefits: (a) Provide enterprise-class
services & support for Linux; (b) expand its
business territory to get revenue from open
source community.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Conclusions
• 5 OSS business models. • UK e-Science Programme
• Long term sustainability helped setting up many e-
depends on Science organisations =>
(a)adopting relevant business Now facing long-term
models; sustainability challenge!
(b)securing funding or • Worth to consider these
revenues; models (esp. Macro R&D)
(c)reviewing the needs to if setting up spins offs from
move one model to research projects, or
another or use multiple setting up long-term
business models. entities from e-Science or
OSS community.
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Where is your organisation?
customers / users funding / investors
OpenBravo, Compiere
OMII-UK XandrOS
Red Hat MySQL
Canonical
Sugar
Interface21 CRM Hyperic
business partners
Web: www.omii.ac.uk Email: info@omii.ac.uk
Related docs
Get documents about "