Probing exotic matter in neutron stars from the study of R-modes - PowerPoint
Document Sample


Probing exotic matter in neutron stars from the study of R-modes
Debarati Chatterjee
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata
Supervisor: Prof. Debades Bandyopadhyay
Neutron Stars
• Compact, massive objects • Remnants of supernova explosions (Type II) • Mass: ~ 1-2 Μsolar
• Radius: ~ 10 Km • Density: ~1015 g/cm3
Structure of a neutron star
Possible phases in the neutron star core
• Hyperons • Bose-Einstein condensates of pions and kaons • Quarks
NS as sources of GW
NS Oscillations
GW
r ,r
EoS
Instabilities in neutron stars
• g-modes: the main restoring force is buoyancy • p-modes: main restoring force is the pressure • f-modes: has an intermediate character of pand g-mode • w-modes: pure space time modes ( only in GR ) • r-modes (inertial modes): main restoring force is the Coriolis force
Why r-modes?
• Newborn neutron stars: r-mode could govern the spin evolution of nascent neutron stars Lead to gravitational waves, detectable to Virgo Cluster with Advanced LIGO • Accreting neutron stars: persistent periodic GW emission expected Several/yr detectable by advanced LIGO Could halt the accretion induced spin up of NS in LMXBs
Inertial frame
CFS Instability
( Chandrasekhar 1970, Friedman and Schutz 1978 )
Inertial frame
Corotating frame
for r-modes, l=m=2
Gravitational radiation reaction driven instability
• A backward mode in corotating frame appears as forward moving mode in inertial frame • GR removes positive angular momentum from a mode whose angular momentum is negative ( moves backward relative to the fluid ) • Angular momentum of the perturbation becomes increasingly negative GR drives the mode unstable
Here comes theTorero: Viscosity!
Shear viscosity • In a normal fluid neutron star, n-n scattering can give rise to shear viscosity
Bulk viscosity In neutron stars, r-modes can perturb the pressure and densities of the fluid equilibrium is lost Reactions between the components tend to drive the system back to equilibrium with a delay, that depends on the characteristic timescale of the interaction Bulk viscosity is generated by processes having time scale comparable to the period of the perturbation
• • •
Critical Angular velocity
• The rotating frame energy E E = ½ | v |
2
d3 x
= ½ ² ² R
-2l+2
r 2l+2 dr
0
R
Lindblom , Owen and Morsink, Phys Rev Lett. 80 (1998) 4843
• imaginary part of the frequency of the r-mode 1 = - 1 r 2E
[
dE ] = - 1 dt GR
+ 1
v
• Mode stable when r > 0 , unstable when r < 0 ( BV > GR ) • Critical angular velocity c : 1 = 0
r
Growth timescale GR
GR
1 = - 1 2E
[ dE ]
dt
GR
R
1 = - 32 G 2l+2 (l -1) 2l (l +2)2l+2 0 (r) r 2l+2 dr GR c 2l+3 [ 2l+3!!]2 ( l+1)
Shear viscosity damping timescale SV
•
SV
1
= - 1 [ dE ] 2E dt SV
R R
0
SV
1 =
(l-1)(2l+1) r ²l dr ( r ²l+2 dr ) - 1
0
Leptonic Bulk Viscosity
• Direct Urca process:
requires proton conc > 11%
• Modified Urca process:
• Coefficient of Modified Urca Bulk Viscosity:
Damping timescale B(h)
• Time derivative of corotating frame energy due to BV is
[ dE ] = - 4 0 Re . v² r ² dr
dt
BV
R
The angle averaged expansion squared is determined numerically . v² = ² ² ( r )6 [ 1 + 0.86 ( r )2 ] ( ² )2 690 R R G
Lindblom , Mendell and Owen, Phys Rev D 60 (1999) 064006
• The time scale BV on which bulk viscosity damps the mode is 1 = - 1 [ dE ] BV 2E dt BV
Damping of r-modes
Viscosity
9
T < 10 K
Shear Viscosity
T > 10 K
9
Bulk Viscosity
n+n+e
-(Urca n + p + Processes)
Leptonic
Nonleptonic
n+nn+p+e+
e
n + p p + np+K-
Coefficient of Bulk Viscosity
Landau and Lifshitz, Fluid Mehanics,2nd ed. ( Oxford,1999) Lindblom and Owen, Phys. Rev. D 65, 063006
p – p = - . v v ~ e it
from particle conservation equation, - .v =-in/n ( t + v . ) x = - i x ( t + v . ) x = - ( x - x ) /
(1)
(2)
(3) (4)
x = x , 1- i
x = dx
dn
n
(5)
p=
p =
p [( n )x + ( p )n. x
dx dn
]
n
dx dn
(6)
[( np )x + 1 i ( p ) .n 1x
]
n
(7)
p – p = i 1- i
= n ( 1- i )
( xp ) n
dx dn
dx n dn
(8)
p ( x )n
(9)
infinite frequency (“fast”) adiabatic index = n ( p) p n x zero frequency (“slow”) adiabatic index 0 = [( p ) + ( p ) . dx ] n x x n dn
=
p ( - 0 ) ( 1- i )
(10)
Theoretical Model
J.Schaffner and I.N.Mishustin, PRC 53,1416 (1996)
N.K. Glendenning and J. Schaffner-Bielich, PRL 81& PRC 60 (1998) S. Banik and D. Bandyopadhyay, PRC 64, 055805 (2001)
Parameters of the theory
Nucleon-meson couplings from properties of symmetric nuclear matter :
• • • • • Binding energy B/A= -16.3 MeV Isospin asymmetry energy coefficient , asym = 32.5 MeV. Saturation density n0 = 0.153 fm -3 Compressibility K = 240 MeV Effective nucleon mass m*/m = 0.78
Compressibility: K = 9 dp dn
1 [ 2 (/n) ] t=0 2 t2
Isospin asymmetry energy coefficient : asym =
where t = ( nn –np ) / n
Hyperon-meson coupling constants
The vector meson-kaon couplings : ½ g = ½ g = g = ⅓ gN ½ g = g = gN ; g = 0 2 g = 2 g = g = - 22 gN 3 scalar meson ( )-hyperon coupling constants UY ( n0 ) = - gY + gY 0
From Hypernuclear data : U ( n0 ) = - 30 MeV, U ( n0 ) = + 30 MeV, U ( n0 ) = - 18 MeV
N N N
* - hyperon couplings from Double-hypernuclear data:
U (
n0 ) =
U (
n0 ) =
U (
n0 ) = 2
U (
n0 ) = - 40 MeV
Kaon-meson coupling constants
vector meson-kaon couplings determined using quark model and isospin counting rule gK = ⅓ gN and gK = gN scalar meson-kaon coupling constants obtained from U K ( n0 ) = - gK - gK 0 where U K ( n0 ) from -100 MeV to -180 MeV
strange scalar and vector meson couplings with (anti)kaons determined from the decay of f0 and SU(6) symmetry relations respectively g* K = 2.65 and 2 gK = 6.04
K=240 MeV, m*/m = 0.78, U K = -120 MeV
Equations of state
I : We consider the non-leptonic reaction, n + p p + xn = nn / nB : fraction of baryons comprised of neutrons ( t + v . ) xn = - ( xn - xn ) / = - n / nb
where n is the production rate of neutrons / volume, which is proportional to the chemical potential imbalance
= -
The relaxation time is given by 1 = nb xn
.
where xn = xn - xn The reaction rate may be calculated using
= 1
40968
d
i=1
4
3
piM2 i
( p1+ p2 - p3 - p4 )F(i) (1+2 -3-4 )
(3)
where M2 = 4 GF 2 sin2 2 c [ 2 mn mp2 m (1- g np2 ) (1- gp2) - mn mp p2 . p4 (1 - g np2 ) (1+ gp2) - mp m p1 . p3 (1 + g np2 ) (1 - gp2) + p1 . p2 p3 . p4 {(1 + g np2 ) (1 + gp2) + 4 gnp gp } + p1 . p4 p2 . p3 {(1 + g np2 ) (1 + gp2) - 4 gnp gp }]
After performing the energy and angular integrals, = 1 <M2 > p4 (kT)2
192 3
where <M2 > is the angle-averaged value of M2
1 = ( kT )2 p < M2 > 192 3 nB xn
Relaxation time
Coefficient of bulk viscosity
Temperature dependence of hyperon bulk viscosity
Modified Urca Bulk Viscosity
Bulk viscosity coefficient due to modified Urca process of nucleons:
B(u) = 6 10 25 2 T 6 r – 2
Lindblom , Owen and Morsink , Phys Rev Lett. 80 (1998) 4843
Instability Window
II :
We consider the non-leptonic reaction, n p + K ( t + v . ) nnK = - ( nnK - nnK ) / = - n
-
where n is the production rate of neutrons / volume, proportional to the chemical potential imbalance = nK - pK - K The relaxation time is given by 1 =
. nn K
The reaction rate may be calculated using 3 3 3 (3) = 1 d p1 d p2 d p3< M2 > ( p1- p2 - p3 ) F(i) (1-2 -3 ) 8 (2)5 1 2 3 where <MK2 > = 2 [( n p - pFn pFp + mn mp ) A2 + [( n p - pFn pFp - mn mp ) B2 ]
After performing the energy and angular integrals, K = 1 <MK2 > pFn 2 16 3 K -
Relaxation time
Coefficient of bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity profile
n + p p +
np+K-
D.C. and D. Bandyopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023003
Critical Angular Velocity
n + p p +
np+K-
Conclusions
• Bulk viscosity due to the nonleptonic weak interactions involving hyperons ( n + p p + ) is sufficient to damp r-mode instability effectively • Bulk viscosity due to the nonleptonic process involving antikaon condensate ( n p + K - ) is not an effective mechanism for damping the r-mode oscillations
Outlook…
• To study the presence of antikaon condensates on the bulk viscosity due to the non-leptonic process ( n + p p + ) involving hyperons and its effect on r-mode instability • To probe neutron star matter containing antikaon condensates using w-mode instability.
Ciao!
Related docs
Get documents about "