A Study of Alternative Operating Strategies for the Southeast

Document Sample
scope of work template
							A Study of Alternative Operating Strategies for the Southeast Expressway HOV Lane
Adriel Edwards Office of Transportation Planning Executive Office of Transportation Boston, MA

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Outline
• • • • • • Background Description of the lane Occupancy requirements – past / present Monitoring requirements and results Modeling effort – methods / findings Next steps

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Background
• CA/T mitigation commitment • DEP regulations
– Stipulate 1 min/mile travel time savings over travel time in general purpose lane – Stipulate quarterly reports with a minimum number of sample travel runs on each facility

• When built
– 1994

• When opened
– 1995
Wednesday June 20, 2007

Lane Construction
Nov 1994 – Nov 1995

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Lane Opens November 1995

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Description of the Lane
• Configuration
– Contraflow – Barrier separated – One ingress / one egress

• Length - 5.2 miles • Hours of operation
– 6 AM – 10 AM northbound to Boston – 3 PM – 7 PM southbound from Boston
Wednesday June 20, 2007

Location of the lane from a regional perspective

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Pictometry image of lane start on a typical weekday morning (northbound to Boston)



Wednesday June 20, 2007

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Barrier Transfer Vehicle

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Occupancy Requirement Past / Present
• 3+ and buses
– November 1995 – September 1996

• Sticker program – alternate days
– September 1996 – January 1999 – # of stickers issued was limited – Red and blue for use on alternative days

• Sticker program – all days
– February 1999 – June 1999

• 2+ - no sticker required
– June 1999 to present day
Wednesday June 20, 2007

Monitoring Requirement
• Quarterly reports

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Results of Monitoring
• One minute per mile time savings threshold NOT met for entire four hours of operation

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Typical Performance of the Southeast Expressway HOV Lane

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Required Activities
• Promote ridesharing
– MassRIDES – Park & Ride lots

• Modeling effort
– Examine alternative operating strategies

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Modeling Study
Method – Three Part Examination • Historical analysis • Regional model analysis • Traffic simulation

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Historical Analysis Results
• 3+ volumes in 1995 hovered around 300 – 400 vehicles/hr
– Lane perceived as empty – Resulted in legislative action requiring sticker program to allow a limited # of 2+ vehicles

• Recent occupancy counts indicate existing 3+ vehicle volumes are about 400 / hr

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Regional Model Results
VEHICLE VOLUMES • 2 + option: adjusted 3 hr volume:
3,750 vehicles  1,250/hr

• 3 + option: adjusted 3 hr volume:
1,200 vehicles  400/hr  EMPTY LANE SYNDROME

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Regional Model Results
(continued) HOV Year 2007 AM Peak Period Northbound
Parameter
HOV travel time savings in minutes HOV travel time savings in min/mile HOV Lane vehicle hours HOV lane vehicle hours saved General lanes vehicle hours

Two-Plus

Three-Plus

9.82 1.81 443 614

12.90 2.38 124 258

5,646

6,847

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Regional Model Results
(continued)
Peak Period Summary Statistics: Air quality, vehicle miles of travel, vehicle hours of travel

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Simulation Results

Simulation Results
2+ 2003 2+ 2007

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Simulation Results

2+ 2003

3+ 2007

Wednesday June 20, 2007

General Conclusions
• 2+ still superior to 3+ by three methods of analysis • 2+ still superior to 3+ by many measures • Effects of HOV lanes’ operating requirements on AQ are inconclusive • Current regulations focus on 1 metric & do not take into account other measures of success • Discussions on changing/replacing regulations with balanced policy should occur • Growing exit queues indicate need to control volumes

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Next Steps
• Technology may be used to control volumes and may also simplify monitoring efforts • EOT exploring next steps • Discussions with DEP and other agencies to occur

Wednesday June 20, 2007

Thank You!
Comments and questions welcome! Adriel Edwards Data Collection Manager for the HOV Lanes Office of Transportation Planning Executive Office of Transportation Adriel.edwards@eot.state.ma.us (617) 973 - 8062

Wednesday June 20, 2007


						
Related docs