TDMA Harmonization Agreements TDMA Harmonization Agreements M A COM 19 April
Document Sample


TDMA Harmonization Agreements
M/A-COM
19-April-2007
TDMA Harmonization Agreements
• In TDMA TG Harmonization Agreements, 06-115-R6*, four TDMA Attributes
were colored yellow—continuing work
– Modulation -- unresolved
– NAC Equivalent – resolved, turn yellow to green
– DUID – resolved, turn yellow to green
– Ramp & Guard – potentially resolved (?)
• For TDMA Attribute -- continued work
– Motorola raised concerns about modulation, simulcast delay spread
performance through 07-006 – TDMA – Motorola Summary of Phy Status,
Jan 4, 2007, see next chart
– Continued contribution/evaluation/discussion in TDMA TG to date
* 06-115-R5, TDMA Harmonization Agreements, TDMA TG Report to the
Project 25 Steering Group, APIC, and User Needs, Jan 8-12, 2007, Mesa, AZ
page 2 / 19-Apr-2007 v0.5
12kbps Linear p/4 DQPSK Downlink
(no pilots) Performance Summary
Non-simulcast performance meets or exceeds the
Phase 1 family of modulations
Simulcast coverage meets or exceeds performance of
C4FM
Simulcast coverage falls short when compared to the
modulations used in most simulcast scenarios for
Phase 1 – a potential issue for existing Phase 1
simulcast customers
A reduction in coverage area on the order of
6-20% was seen, the actual loss depends
on specific coverage criteria (mobile vs.
portable, in-building design, terrain etc).
8 800MHz systems were reviewed by Motorola:
3 had ~6% reduction in coverage area
3 had ~12-15% reduction in coverage area
19-Apr-2007 v0.5
2 had ~20% reduction in coverage area 3
Simulcast Delay Spread Summary
• M/A-COM contends the delay spread issue is resolved by the EHR vocoder
performance improvement by itself (60+ usec) (07-034)
• M/A-COM has presented many other independent techniques to allay
concerns even more
• I/F Bandwidth adjustment (07-009)
• Enhanced symbol sampling (07-009)
• H-D8PSK modulation (07-050)
• Coverage design considerations (timing, etc.) (07-009, 07-064)
• Equalizers (07-009)
• EADS has presented vocoder FEC techniques that could improve the
vocoder BER performance even more, increasing the delay spread
capabilities of 12 kbps way above today’s 9600
page 4 / 19-Apr-2007 v0.5
Simulcast Delay Spread Updates - 1
• Motorola has recently clarified that their 9.6 kbps TDMA proposal uses
a C4FM baseline with linear modulation as a manufacturer’s option
(not part of the standard)
– Proposal defined by TDMA CAI 0.89
– Does not preclude linear modulation for downlink for enhanced delay
spread performance
– But, does not propose standardizing as part of Ph 2
– So, Motorola 9.6 proposal offers C4FM 50 usec, 5 % BER delay
spread performance
• Harmonized 12 kbps proposal offers enhanced delay spread capability
– 80 usec, 5 % BER with H-DQPSK downlink
– (Even H-CPM downlink (before changed to H-DQPSK in Frisco)
offers equivalent/better delay spread performance than 9.6 proposal)
page 5 / 19-Apr-2007 v0.5
TDMA Attribute – Modulation (including
Simulcast Delay Spread) Recommendation
• Harmonized 12 kbps proposal offers enhanced delay spread capability
– As noted, M/A-COM believes stretch goal is met
– Exceeds delay spread capability of Motorola 9.6 proposal
– Additional options have been contributed to enhance even further if
desired
– Also, manufacturer options could be considered (as Motorola says
for their 9.6 proposal) to enhance even further
• M/A-COM believes contributions and options provide a sufficient base
of practical techniques to achieve enhanced delay spread within the
12 kbps harmonized proposal that the TDMA Attribute – Modulation,
Simulcast Delay Spread should be considered resolved
– M/A-COM recommends turning this attribute from yellow to green
page 6 / 19-Apr-2007 v0.5
Related docs
Get documents about "