Conference Briefing Paper - Final

Document Sample
Conference Briefing Paper - Final Powered By Docstoc
					                               “
                                           I had to go to my local MP and say I am trying
                                          to stop my daughter coming home in a body
                                          bag”


                               These words of a parent speak volumes. They reflect the fear,
                               agony, anticipated loss and helplessness experienced by a parent
                               whose daughter’s life is at risk. They speak of a parent’s fight to
                               stop an ultimate loss she may have to suffer and the ultimate cost
                               her child and their family may have to pay.


THE TRUE COST                        Introduction
TO FAMILIES OF
                               Child sexual exploitation (CSE) has devastating consequences not
 CHILD SEXUAL                  just to victims, but to those around them. Some of these costs are
 EXPLOITATION                  directly obvious while others are more subtle, hidden and not
                               readily apparent. True cost to families refers to the full cost
                               incurred by the whole of the family unit particularly the parents,
CROP Conference                but also siblings, grandparents and other wider family members.
                               Estimation of these costs require a wider understanding of sexual
    2009                       exploitation of children and an analysis of costs beyond those that
                               are tangible.

                               The nature of CSE is that it is a course of conduct rather than an
Briefing Paper                 isolated incident leading to a series of serious sexual and other
                               offences. It is best described as a process of involving children in
                               sexual activities through means such as deceit, manipulation,
                               coercion, use of violence or of threats or of force, with cumulative
 Aravinda Kosaraju             effect on children, families, social systems and the community as
 Policy and Research Officer   a whole. We cannot ignore the recorded financial cost to
                               statutory agencies, although that is not the key emphasis of this
                               paper. In England and Wales police recorded 53,540 sexual
                               offences in 2007-08 of which 41,460 were recorded under the
                               category of most serious sexual crime including rape, sexual
                               assault and sexual offences against children.1 Home Office
                               research published in 2005 estimated that each adult rape costs
                               over £76,000 in emotional and physical impact, cost to the health
                               services and criminal justice system and lost output. The total
                               cost of sexual offences committed in England and Wales in
                               2003-04 was estimated at nearly £8.5 billion.2

                               Most social problems create considerable long-term costs to
                               society. Those costs can be looked at either as a cost to the
                               victim; to the society; to the economy; or to the social agencies
                               tackling the problem such as social care, education, health, police
                               or other criminal justice agencies.



                               *Illustration by Helen Anderson from CROP’s STOP! She ‘s my daughter as told
                               to Christine Miles (2007).
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                  2


CSE is costly both as an individual and societal problem. It is important to consider both,
although the purpose of this paper is to focus on possibly one of the most hidden - the true cost
to families. During the course of to-day we will be exploring this in a range of different ways.

Before we explore the true cost we ought to discern who the victims and respondents of CSE
are? We would be grossly underestimating the cost of victimisation if we do not address
victimisation broadly to include both frontline victims and those around them whose lives are
affected. Sexual exploitation touches families like a double edged sword forcing them to pay the
price both as victims and as respondents.

Costs borne by frontline victims are often looked at and highlighted with limited or no emphasis
on the costs to those around them whose lives are significantly, if not equally disrupted as a
consequence. This paper looks at the costs of sexual exploitation to families with affected
parents as a measure. It also aims to indicate social costs and the lack of effective interventions
in tackling CSE.

     Parents as Victims and as Respondents

CROP works with the parents and families of frontline victims who are desperately concerned
about their child and their energy is directed to protect them. But they too suffer.

Sexually exploited children suffer physical, psychological, behavioural and attitudinal changes;
these all present challenges to the parents and threatens the peace and stability of the family
environment. To cite an example, the victim may direct emotional, verbal and even physical
aggression against parents, siblings or pets resulting in chaos within the family home. The child’s
estrangement from the family achieved by the perpetrator as a result of calculated grooming
leads to strained relationships, broken families, further amplifying social costs. Families are often
compelled to take extraordinary measures in their attempt to care for the frontline victim: some
uproot the family, moving to another city or even country to get away from the cause of the
problem.

Parents are sometimes much nearer to being frontline




                                                           “
victims- through threats, assaults and other damage                Her mum was mortified
caused by perpetrators. Siblings are targeted in order                 when she (daughter)
to put pressure on the whole family. The stigma associ-                 attacked her with a
ated with sexual exploitation and its consequences on                    wooden hammer.”
the child such as anxiety, depression, eating disorders
and self-harm cause misery and isolation for parents and other family members. Problems with
relationships, truancy and exclusion from school, misuse of harmful substances also add to
parental distress.

Perception of costs of sexual exploitation can also be significantly varied. The child’s perception
of the cost of what is happening may be that she is only being friendly for a return of friendship,
love, gifts, social networks and excitement. Contrary to this parents may perceive the
relationship as not being normal and foresee the long term cost the child is or is likely to pay.
This conflict of perception can itself add to the cost to families.
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                3


Parents of sexually exploited children are often ignored (despite the effects on them) or seen as
part of the problem. No doubt there are some parents who are themselves incriminated, but the
parents who come to CROP in hundreds (thousands if only CROP had the capacity to respond)
are genuinely caring parents. They deserve to be respected, not marginalised or disempowered,
as disempowerment produces relentless costs to families and to the society at large.

Respected for what they are? Parents are not mere second line victims, but agents who are the
first to be in the line of fire to protect their child. They have the knowledge, expertise and
capacity to safeguard their child. Their agency in the resistance to and recovery of the child from
the damage caused is significant. Their capacity is, however, undermined by the activities of the
perpetrators and through the exclusion they experience from the responding agencies.

                           Parental agency, however, is not insulated from their victimhood. It is
If there is one duty       straightforward to get a car repaired when it has been smashed by
team in the whole          perpetrators, but it is not so easy or simple to overcome the trauma
world that is on duty      of knowing their child is being abused. Parents need help, ideas, vi-
all day, everyday          sion, accompaniment, legal and technical support. Their agency needs
                           recognition along with the loss and victimisation incumbent within
24/7 without any
                           their agency. Such recognition requires responses that are suppor-
boundaries it is the       tive, collaborative and inclusive. So what costs do parents pay as vic-
parent.                    tims of and as agents responding to CSE?

      CSE and Families: The Ultimate Cost                           “I’d like to understand
The most obvious cost that families pay is loss of life either   what these pimps are like,
of a parent, the exploited child or another family member.           what makes them tick.
Natialie Pearman (16), Fiona Ivison (17), Carly Bateman
(17), Marcella Ann-Davis (18), Tania Nicol (19), Rebecca             How they can persuade
Stevenson (19), Samantha Bennet (19), Danielle Moorcroft                    girls they’re their
(19), Sarah Jane Coughlan (19), Becky Hall (19), Amy                   boyfriends, and then
Anderson (19), Dawn Shields (19) an endless list of those
children and young women whose lives met a violent end           make them sell their body.
as a consequence of sexual exploitation.                         I suppose that’s drugs too.
                                                                    They steal people’s lives:
Women in prostitution are 18 times more likely to be
murdered than the general population.4                                 their hopes and their
                                                                           dreams. Joanna’s
CROP, Sheffield Sexual Exploitation Service, Blackpool               ‘boyfriend’ did that for
Awaken Project all were formed as a consequence of the
death of a young woman, but are the examples of the              four years before her body
ultimate cost both families and social agencies pay.                             was found.”3
     CSE and Families: Health Costs

Parents suffer years of desperation from the time the child starts to behave strangely, starts
truanting, use substances and show signs of the control of perpetrators. The whole family includ-
ing siblings and often extended families are drawn into the turmoil.
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                               4


Feelings that start off as shock, denial, anger and
resentment towards their child, sense of guilt, self-blame
turn into hatred towards the perpetrator. The anxiety, fear
                                                                “This has changed me.
of being judged, shame and embarrassment often stops            Nothing will ever shock
them from talking to someone leading to further isolation.
Frustration creeps in as they try to respond to what is          me. I am not the same
happening in the family home. Attempting to take control;      person, not myself. I am
asserting boundaries; offering positive and negative          not emotional any more.”
reinforcements to de-groom the child; seeking professional
help and working to provide a stable environment for
other children all put a strain on their ability to cope.




“
         Armed police came        CROP’s work clearly evidences the association between CSE
                                  and parental health resulting in several physical and mental
         to search my house
                                  health consequences. Physical injuries directly resulting from
         in the middle of the     violent attacks both from children and perpetrators are not
         night (in response       uncommon. Illnesses such as high blood pressure; strokes;
to a complaint of possession      reduced immunity; stress and sleeplessness affecting their
of a gun). We were all            general well being are commonly observed.
ordered to put our hands
                                  Most common mental health concerns identified amongst
up. I saw my 12 year old boy
                                  parents are stress, anxiety, depression, Post Traumatic Stress
screaming. I was frantic; my      Disorder (PTSD), suicidal tendencies and psycho-somatic disor-
boy was rocking back and          ders. Emotional problems also lead to mental ill-health and
forth traumatised and             other long term health and relational problems. For instance
frightened.”                      disclosure of sexual abuse of their children led to parents ex-
                                  periencing severe disturbance in their own sexual relation-
                                  ships.

Parents are often prescribed anti-depressants, referred to specialist counselling services and are
treated for psychological disturbance with symptoms such as self harm and suicidal attempts.

      CSE and Families: The Financial Cost

Sexual exploitation of children brings costs that are real which can only be measured and paid in
tears, in emotions, in sleepless nights, in broken frustrated conversations, in the sense of guilt
and the total breaking of life. One extreme example is the cost to one family that CROP has
come to support (amongst many families whose properties have been criminally damaged in
many ways) whose family house was burnt down allegedly by their daughter’s abusers resulting
in the death of her sibling and the family being made homeless.

Despite its immeasurability, there are some straightforward monetary costs. Child sexual
exploitation drains the resources of parents. Although it is difficult to provide any overall
measurement, this paper looked at the financial costs incurred by three families in three differ-
ent towns across England. These costs are deduced from the obvious expenses incurred by
parents that would have otherwise been avoided, but for the sexual exploitation of their child.
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION   5




 Family confronted with
 their 15 year old daughter
 groomed online:




Family confronted with their
two daughters exploited by
a group of perpetrators:




  Family whose daughter was
  targeted by an individual
  perpetrator:
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                  6




“        My partner had to sell his treasured collections. We had to pawn jewellery,
         sell things from home to meet the expenses.”
The three families paid an average of £7,000 - £8,000 on phone bills, prescription charges, house
repairs caused by violence from the perpetrators and distressed family members, and replacing
broken items. These estimates are conservative and we can only provide an approximation. Not
all costs are readily identifiable. These costs range from increased phone or patrol bills; cost of
criminal damage to property; cost of replacing lost or stolen goods; loss of wages due to sickness
absences; loss of employment; cost of displacements (home and businesses); costs of medical
care including consultations, prescriptions, visits as well as time lost in recovery from ill-health;
travel costs incurred in attending meetings, police enquiries, court proceedings; time and money
spent looking for missing children; legal costs (e.g. separation/divorce proceedings when rela-
tionships breakdown); investigative costs (e.g. hiring a private detective); payments towards
child’s recovery (e.g. detoxification); fines from criminal justice system (e.g. bailing out children
or parking tickets when parents were looking for missing children); child care costs while parents
respond to what is happening to the exploited child; and/or premature funeral expenses.



“   One Sunday morning we woke up to find the house had been graffitied. ‘Rachel
is a cock-sucking slag’ they’d daubed across the house.


W        e discovered they’d also spray-painted planks and put them up by the local
shops; we received a threat that our house would be letter-bombed. We had a metal
plate fitted to our door so that post couldn’t be delivered.” 5

     CSE and Families: Human, Emotional and Relational (Familial & Social) Costs
In the last 5 years CROP worked with nearly 400 families from across the social and economic
spectrum. However, the differentials in terms of human and emotional costs to parents when
confronted with CSE are small despite the social and other differences. Estimating the non-
monetary human and emotional cost is a formidable task. The pain and suffering, the fear from
threats, fear of loss, and the trauma all act as major detriments to the quality of life and to the
loss of familial integrity. These include suffering the lack of freedom. The parent cannot switch
off at the end of the day, because the sexual exploitation is not a case allocated to a professional,
but a personal and family experience.




“
          Me and her mum split up, we could not cope. Her sister (younger) hated
          her for the misery she caused the family.”
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                   7


Parents find themselves socially isolated because they feel no one will understand what is going
on, or will listen with respect and patience to their experience. But this social isolation is not the
root; it lies in their isolation from themselves, their family members with CSE challenging their
understanding, perspectives and values around relationships and family life. The isolation from
the child, so deliberately engendered by the exploiting groomer, constantly eats away at their
attempts to repair.

Cost of such disruption to social networks and the social-psychological issues associated with
stigma and isolation are also difficult to estimate. Parents commonly experience -

   •   Breakdown of their relationship with the exploited child. Example, parents unaware of
       child’s sexual health issues owing to confidentiality may inadvertently add to
       confrontation, strained or severed relationships;

   •   Strained relationships with other extended family members;

   •   Marriage and partnership breakdowns caused by stress, conflicting parenting styles or
       impact of CSE on parental sexual relationships;

   •   Disruption of relationships at the workplace owing to lack of understanding, empathy and
       resentment for taking time off sick by colleagues and employers;

   •   Judgemental attitudes from others for not being better parents isolates them from any
       other social networks that parents may have, including friends and other community
       networks.




“
          My friends told me to leave her (daughter), to stop worrying about her.
          They don’t understand. I have lost friends. They don’t want to be around.
          They think I have changed. How could I leave my child?”

       CSE and Families: The True Cost of Inaction

Parents feel that indicators of risk of sexual exploitation are not picked up in the initial stages of
grooming making recovery difficult and often impossible. Safeguarding partners’ responses are
delayed and most often too late for the children. Preventing sexual exploitation is vital to
safeguarding children. Access to appropriate support for victims enabling them to become
agents of recovery and resistance is vital to minimise the long term costs to victims and social
agencies. When those affected are not safeguarded and when perpetrators are not brought to
justice, the residue is the real cost to families and societies. The children who are killed or dam-
aged in various ways whose ‘lost lives’ are unfortunately the glaring examples of the real cost of
sexual exploitation.

Lack of a enforcement priority for safeguarding their children and the lower rate of prosecutions
add to the frustration of parents. While we could say the number of prosecutions has risen over
the last two years, the changes remain insignificant when compared to the number of
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                               8




                                                          “
perpetrators that go unpunished. The role of parents                  The men sent her in to
and carers in removing the onus of prosecutions from                  shops to pinch whiskey
victims and in achieving victimless prosecutions has
                                                                        for them. As a result,
been highlighted in the recent successful prosecution
brought about by Derbyshire constabulary.                               Jessica and I went to
                                                            court three times for shoplifting.
Some of the costs both to the victim and the family may         And once, when Jessica was
appear to evaporate over time either due to outside        found lying drunk in the street, I
intervention or due to the child’s efforts or the           was also fined by the police. She
perpetrator disappearing from the scene. However,
                                                            was fetched out of cells so many
these costs may remain dormant to be transmitted
intergenerationally.                                           times at the police station.” 6

     CSE and Families: Inter-generational Costs

70 % of those involved in prostitution started out as children or young teenagers.7

The long term affects of CSE on both children and families is less considered, let alone
researched. Children in their teenage years experience a sense of freedom to positively
experiment and learn in a protective and enabling environment. When teenagers are deprived
of a normal period of experimental but protected risktaking, learning social skills, the costs can
be long-term and profoundly destructive of persons.8 They suffer significant losses affecting
their behavioural, emotional, cognitive and functional abilities. Their isolation from school and
other learning environments has detrimental affect on their education, training and employment
capabilities leading to and absence of self-reliance. The violence and the trauma they encounter
affects their ability to thrive, significantly affecting their development. As prospects for
conventional employment diminish, their lack of choices may make them vulnerable to commer-
cial sexual exploitation.

                                            The long term consequences of child sexual



“
         My son was bullied at              exploitation to siblings have not been captured yet in
         school. He was called              research. Siblings suffer actual or the risk of harm;
         names. Pupils shouting at          the feeling of being neglected while parents
         him...your sister is a whore,      concentrate their energy and time on the exploited
         sleeping with a …..”               child; the trauma and emotional impact of loss of a
                                            sibling; the isolation and harassment affecting their
                                            own ability to thrive and enjoy.

In their attempts to support their children whose lives are so violently and irreparably damaged
parents also end up caring for their grandchildren; dealing with chaos emanating from the life of
their children; and tackling the after affects in their grandchildren.

“  ‘It’s my fault. It wouldn’t have happened if I told someone. It’s my fault Fiona’s
been killed.’

O     h, sorrow upon sorrow. Fiona exploited and sold on the streets by a pimp and
then murdered by a violent punter and my fourteen-year-old daughter thinks it’s
her fault.” 9
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                 9


     CSE and Families: Cost of Disengaging

When agencies work to respond to child sexual exploitation, parents are often ignored, as
though they do not pay costs, or they only pay costs they themselves incurred by being bad
parents, or as though their costs do not count, and may be left to evaporate or at least to be
contained within the private fate of the parents who have had an unlucky family experience.

Becoming agents gives dignity, sense of worth and
purpose, which can be deeply supportive and transforma-
                                                             “   I went to the meetings with
tive. Parents who become agents are not super-agents. a lot of hope and then came
They do concentrate on a particular case with an intensity back really gutted”
and persistence which no social worker or policeman can
do, but they still come up against the limits of what they can do.

Parents feel blamed, unheard, devalued and disrespected. Only a fraction of parents that are
                                 supported by CROP feel their role is being valued from the

“                                beginning. Often a parent support worker has to advocate
     It is not easy to see every for parents to be engaged in strategy meetings where
professional around the table decisions about their children are being made. Despite such
to have a file on you, your      disfranchisement, parents often act as the clearing house for
child and your family. You feel sharing information with various agencies, helping them
                                 understand what processes are underway; who is dealing
like a criminal to begin with.”
                                 with what; and how the child is responding to those
                                 interventions.

CROP was founded and is led by parents, championing for the last 13 years the need for parents
and carers to be recognised as agents, they may be victimised and yet they continue to make a
significant investment in attempts of recovery and resistance. Sheffield and Blackburn Local
Authorities proactively involve parents and carers as a matter of policy and practice respectively.

     CSE and the Cost to key Social Agencies

Education
Children who are sexually exploited or at risk of exploitation figure in the statistics of those who
are truanting, excluded, referred to pupil referral units (PRUs); resulting in a significant cost to
the education system. Barnardo’s research highlighted that 75% of children abused through
sexual prostitution had been missing from school.10

• The average total cost to a parent of sending a child to school is £15,940;11
• The average extra cost of educating a permanently excluded pupil is £7,181 per year;12
• Every year over 10,000 children are excluded from school producing an annual cost of £650m
  (£63,851 each) to society; 13
• There are the nearly 198,000 persistent truants in the UK costing on an average £44,468
  leading to a total cost of £8.8bn per annum;14
                                                                                15
• Educational welfare services cost £706 per truant per annum at 2005 prices;
• Per capita cost for a pupil with special educational needs in 2008-09 in England and Wales is
  £3,310.16
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                10


Social Care
The first port of call for parents confronted with sexual grooming of their children is either the
police or social care. These agencies are entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding chil-
dren. A survey by the Department of Health indicates that 76% of all Area Child Protection Com-
mittees (ACPC) in England dealt with children involved in prostitution in their area.17 A subse-
quent report focusing on sexual exploitation in London estimated that only half of cases are
known to local authorities, and that 1,000 children in London alone are affected.18 A recent 2009
survey of the National Working Group identified 2424 children supported by various projects
across the country.19

• The cost of placing a child in a local authority secure children's’ home is £185,780 per year; 20
• Total mean costs of group therapy were found to be £1,949 and total mean costs of individual
  therapy were found to be £3,195;21
• Indicative costs for professionals attending a Child Protection conference is £304 and £164 for
  a child protection review meeting excluding the costs of attendance of children, parents and
  other non-professionals;22
• The median cost of social services for children looked after for a week is estimated at £273 as
  opposed £55 to children supported in their families or independently. The highest cost for a
  looked after child was £8,969, and £8,521 for child supported in the family or independently.23

Police
Frequent going missing from home or care is one of the significant indicators of child sexual
exploitation. Parent/carer’s first contact with police in the context of sexual exploitation occurs
often with their children being reported missing. Around 90% of children subjected to sexual
grooming go missing at some time.24 An estimated 140,000 children and young people runaway
or go missing every year in the UK.25 Around 10,000 are hurt or harmed whilst away.26

•   The social cost of policing runaway and missing children alone is £220 million a year.27
•   The average cost of police investigation of a missing incident is £1000.28
•   Cost of police activity per homicide is £ 107,299; serious wounding is £2357; other wounding is
    £389; and common assault is £90.29

Criminal Justice System
CROP’s work shows that prosecution of crimes involving CSE are rare. Only a few result in
charges being made and a further few are tried. However, ineffective prevention and interven-
tion strategies can significantly add to the criminal justice costs.

• Cost incurred by the criminal justice system per homicide is £118,299; per incidence of serious
  wounding is £9127 and sexual offence £3837 including policing costs;30
                                                                                                31
• The total cost of sexual offences to the criminal justice system is estimated at £498,810,000.

Health
We cannot over-estimate the costs emanating from the health care consequences of CSE on
children and families to the health care system.

•   The total cost of sexual violence each year is £25.7bn.32
•   The Home Office has estimated that the economic and human cost of trafficking in 2003 was
    £1bn for the UK.33
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                   11


• One hospital episode without complications for multiple injuries is £2265 and £3831 with
  complications; rape and assault by penetration costs to hospital and ambulance as £680 per
  incident; 34
• Estimates put the cost of each rape at over £120,000, in emotional and physical impact, the cost
  to the health service and the cost to the criminal justice service.35

Way Forward

CROP welcomes the 2009 Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF) guidance on
Safeguarding Children and Young People from Sexual Exploitation, which for the first time ac-
knowledged the impact on families and indicated the need to support families caught up in the
web of sexual exploitation. However, policies and guidance cannot make the needed difference.
We have to work relentlessly to improve practice.

Child sexual exploitation is not only a criminal issue; it is a safeguarding issue and a public health
issue. It pays to invest in early and targeted intervention. Our experience shows that multi-agency
teams with a skill mix working to build partnership with affected families are a way forward.

The role and agency of parents should be valued, acknowl-



                                                                 “
edging and offering support to enable them to become equal
                                                                              Don’t judge the book
partners. Social denial of the role of parents is reflected in the            by the cover, open it
fact that hardly any services are available to support parents.               and read a few pages
Parents have the welfare of children at heart and suffer                      before you decide…”
enormously from the effects of sexual exploitation on their
children. In a complete contrast there are often assumptions
that blame parents or children for what is happening to them, which appear to be based on the
ethical framework of children’s rights, best interests etc. It is time to bring these conflicting
considerations into public debate and restore the agency of parents.

Serious errors can occur if policy analysis ignores the intangibles when allocating resources.
Currently in the UK burglary and car crimes seems to take precedence over tackling child sexual
exploitation. No doubt these crimes should be dealt with. However, these economic crimes have
much less severe psychological effects on victims and relatively lesser cost to the Exchequer. It is
time we improve incidence and cost estimates including estimates of long term costs on
individual victim and their families to inform local needs assessments and to check local spending
priorities.

Families cannot ignore the costs of CSE those confronting them from the actions of perpetrators
and from the lack of or limited action from social agencies. The damage done by sexual exploita-
tion cannot be repaired simply by catching and punishing the exploiter. People can see the perpe-
trators sentenced in court, and be glad about it, but be left still with broken lives, with costs to
carry.

How then do we account truly for these real costs? How are they brought out from their invisibil-
ity? And from their unmanageability? Or is the question rather, how do we support and accom-
pany those who pay these real costs? Or how do we protect our children from exploitation, from
its consequences and from living with its long term affects. The aim of this conference is to
explore ways of accounting some of these costs and promote some discussion of how they may
be carried and ameliorated.
                                            ♦♦♦♦♦
THE TRUE COST TO FAMILIES OF CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION                                                                12


END NOTES

1.    Kershaw C Nicholas S & Walker A (2008) Crime in England and Wales 2007/08 Findings from British Crime Sur-
      vey and Police Recorded Crime: Home Office p.174.
2.    HM Government (2007) Cross Government Action Plan on Sexual Violence and Abuse p.7.
3.    Miles C (2007) STOP! She’s my daughter Leeds: CROP p.61.
4.    Järvinen J Kail A &Miller I (2008) Hard Knock Life New Philanthropy Capital P.7.
5.    Miles C (2007) STOP! She’s my daughter Leeds: CROP p.47.
6.    Miles C (2007) STOP! She’s my daughter Leeds: CROP p.32.
7.    Home Office (2004) Paying the Price: a consultation paper on prostitution p.5.
8.    Willmer H (2005) Lost Teenage Leeds: CROP.
9.    Ivison I (1997) Fiona’s Story – A tragedy of our times London: Virago p.222.
10.   Home Office (2004) Paying the Price: A consultation paper on prostitution p. 26.
11.   Norwich Union Survey (2008) accessed from http://www.aviva.com/media/news/4356/ on 07 November 2009.
12.   Brooks M Goodall E & Heady L (2007) Misspent youth: The costs of truancy and exclusion New Philanthropy
      Capital p. 9
13.   Brooks M Goodall E & Heady L (2007) Misspent youth: The costs of truancy and exclusion New Philanthropy
      Capital p. 20.
14.   Brooks M Goodall E & Heady L (2007) Misspent youth: The costs of truancy and exclusion New Philanthropy
      Capital p. 16.
15.   Brooks M Goodall E & Heady L (2007) Misspent youth: The costs of truancy and exclusion New Philanthropy
      Capital p.16.
16.   Commons Hansard Written Answers for 31 March 2009 accessed on 12 November 2009 from http://
      www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090331/text/90331w0024.htm
17.   Swan S & Balding V (2001) Safeguarding Children involved in Prostitution Guidance Review accessed from
      http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/05/94/69/04059469.pdf Department of Health.
18.   Goodall E & Lumley T (2007) Not seen and not heard: Child abuse, A guide for donors and funders, New Philan-
      thropy Capital.
19.   Unpublished survey results from the National Working Group for Sexually Exploited Young People.
20.   Young People and Prison: The Facts accessed on 10 November 2009 from http://www.smartjustice.org/
      ypfacts.html
21.   McCrone P Weeramanthri T Knapp M Rushton A Trowell J Miles G & Kolvin I (2006)Cost-effectiveness of indi-
      vidual versus group psychotherapy for sexually abused girls. Research Summary DfES.
22.   Katz I Bhabra S Corlyon J Moran P Ghate D La Placa V & Beecham J (2006) Costs and outcomes - Meeting the
      Mental Health Needs of Children in the Child Protection System. Research Summary DfES.
23.   Bebbington A & Beecham J (2006) Costs and Outcomes Child Care Costs: Variations and Unit Costs. Research
      Summary DfES.
24.   DCSF (2008) Young Runaways Action Plan p.16
25.   Report of Parliamentary Panel (2007) Safeguarding children and young people who runaway or go missing from
      home or care.
26.   Evans K Houghton- Brown M & Rees G (2007) Stepping Up:The Future of Runaways Services London: The Chil-
      dren’s Society p.10
27.   House of Commons Debates on 09 January 2008 accessed on 26 October 2008 from http://
      www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080109/debindx/80109-x.htm
28.   Report of Parliamentary Panel (2007) Safeguarding children and young people who runaway or go missing from
      home or care.
29.   Walby S (2004) The Cost of Domestic Violence Women and Equality Unit p.41.
30.   Walby S (2004) The Cost of Domestic Violence Women and Equality Unit p 42.
31.   Walby S (2004) The Cost of Domestic Violence Women and Equality Unit p.42.
32.   Järvinen J Kail A &Miller I (2008) Hard Knock Life New Philanthropy Capital p. 54.
33.   Dubourg R & Prichard S (Ed.) (2007) The impact of organised crime in the UK: Revenues and economic and social
      costs Home Office p.14.
34.   Walby S (2004) The Cost of Domestic Violence Women and Equality Unit p.46.
35.   Järvinen J Kail A &Miller I (2008) Hard Knock Life New Philanthropy Capital p. 54.