Road Users' Perspectives on Highway Funding

Document Sample
Road Users' Perspectives on Highway Funding Powered By Docstoc
					Road Users’ Perspectives on Highway Funding
Greg Cohen President and CEO American Highway Users Alliance
Founding Member, Americans for A Strong National Highway Network Coalition

Americans for a Strong National Highway Network
• • • • • • • AAA American Highway Users Alliance American Motorcyclist Association American Trucking Associations Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Assn. Recreational Vehicle Industry Assn. NATSO (truck stops and travel plazas)

About The Highway Users
• National federal of 270 associations and businesses including AAA clubs, bus companies, truckers, motorcyclists, and a variety of industries that rely on safe and efficient roads for personal or business needs. • Many states have State Highway Users federations or Better Transportation groups who are our affiliates

Our Highways Have Reached A Mid-Life Crisis
• The problem is bigger than 70,000 bridges • Unsafe roads a contributing cause in 40 deaths per day • 4% new highway capacity since 1980, despite more than 100% travel growth • Under investment by all levels of government in capital improvements.
– $70B in annual investment, despite $78B cost to maintain, and $131B cost to improve

Special Federal Problems
• No gas tax increase since 1993 (18.4/24.4 cents) • 2005 “Bridges to Nowhere” debacle • Trust fund cash reserves being fully spent • Bankruptcy and funding cuts projected for 2009

Funding Options
• • • • User fee increases or new user fees Bonding against future revenue Devolution of program to States Loosening Rules for more traditional tolling or pricing • PPPs

Highway Users Will Pay Under All Options
• Fuel taxes are broadly applied and well distributed among all drivers • Bonds require guaranteed future revenue streams and push the problem to the next generation. Easiest politically. • Devolution removes federal funding, leadership, and national consistencies in road quality. States unprepared.

Highway Users Will Pay Under All Options
• Tolling and pricing existing “free” roads means a small segment of road users pay while others do not. Particularly regressive approach for middle class and working class drivers. • Most PPPs rely on tolls that rise faster than traditional toll roads

Broad User Fees Are Fairest Approach*
*But politically difficult – approach with caution, bipartisanship, and prepare your constituencies well in advance! • What makes a “user fee” and why does it gain more support than a “tax”.
– User fee programs are transparent – Users must fully benefit from their fees – no diversions! – More than 90% of Americans support a gas tax if the money is spent exclusively on roads and bridges (Andres McKenna survey 2002) – A true user fee is the right response to bridges falling down – and the motoring public can understand that!

Garnering Support from Motorists for higher user fees
• Bipartisan leadership – must be above “politics” • No embarrassing projects earmarked • No diversions of user fees from bridges and roads • Key support from user groups: state highway users federation, AAA clubs, taxpayer groups, trucking companies and drivers, business community: tourism, restaurants, manufacturers, etc.
– Our support will work for you in the press and with your colleagues

Toll Roads and PPPs
• Traditionally, publicly owned toll roads with political oversight are designed to maximize public benefits and minimize costs. • Under private leasing, the goal is to maximize profit and minimize competition. • Yet both traditional toll roads and PPPs can be reasonable approaches for NEW road construction. • According to AASHTO, the most aggressive tolling efforts would only provide 5% of the nation’s needed funding for highways.

Toll Roads and PPPs (continued)
• What makes a good toll road or PPP project?
– New construction / benefits to those paying – For public toll road, all toll money can be used to pay for the construction (no diversion) – For private owners/leasers, assumption of risk may yield rewards (or it may not) – Diverse community of local, regional, and interstate road users must be actively in support, particularly for a PPP project – Reasonable anti-gouging provisions through toll increase caps significantly below inflation and profit caps. – Keep leases short - no more than 20 years to incentivize leaser to work toward lease renewal – High maintenance, congestion, and safety standards

The Case Against Leasing Existing Road Capacity
• Leasing existing public road capacity does not usually meet the “public interest test” because…
– Financial mission must change from maximizing public benefit to maximizing allowable profit – Toll increases more aggressive than they would be under public structure – An existing base of motorists will be essentially forced to patronize the private road (esp. under non-compete) – Like many toll roads, the pricing will likely be discriminatory against certain road users. – A trend of leased roads will result in a pre-1956 quilt of roads rather than the current National Highway System -- pitting State against State with aggressive pricing of outsiders

Diversion More Tempting with Leasing
• Unlike traditional user fees and tolls, leasing (and bonding) allows a State or City to receive cash “up front”.
– In the case of Chicago, the cash was nearly completely diverted from transportation – In the case of Indiana, the cash is currently being spent on roads – The defunct proposal in New Jersey involved diversion of funds to non-road purposes

• This problem already exists with gas taxes but the temptation to appropriate is greater under leases because of the sudden influx of cash.

Addressing Federal Funding Shortfall a KEY Issue for NCSL
• NCSL’s Transportation Committee has taken a courageous step in calling for a federal user fee increase. • As we have in the past, we want to work with you and other key groups (NGA, League of Cities, Conf. of Mayors, etc) to press Congress. • Without a strong federal program, the financial problems facing the States will be many times greater. • A strong, national response to aging infrastructure, safety, congestion, and interstate freight mobility is in every State’s interest • A federal user fee increase will be politically difficult. Removal of embarrassments and diversions key to garnering strong bipartisan support.

Leadership Needed
• We need a minimum of 4 elected official leaders from NCSL to champion the federal reauthorization in 2009.

• Volunteers?

Shared By:
Lingjuan Ma Lingjuan Ma