What is effective leadership?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________
LEADERSHIP
THE ABILITY TO INFLUENCE PEOPLE
BASES OF INFLUENCE
French & Raven
LEGITIMATE
COERCIVE
REWARD
EXPERT
REFERENT
BASES OF INFLUENCE
Weber
LEGITIMATE TRADITIONAL CHARISMATIC
BASES OF INFLUENCE
Another view
CONTROL RESOURCES
AWARE OF IT
WANT TO HAVE POWER KNOW HOW TO USE IT
LEADERSHIP &
MANAGER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY MOTIVATION CONTROL CULTURE VISION
LEADERSHIP TRAITS
NO CONSISTENT SET OF TRAITS
Also see Attribution Theory
THEORY X
1. PEOPLE INHERENTLY DISLIKE WORK, WILL AVOID IT 2. NOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY, WANT FORMAL DIRECTION 3. WANT SECURITY, LITTLE AMBITION 4. MUST BE COERCED, CONTROLLED, THREATENED
THEORY Y
1. WORK NATURAL AS PLAY, REST
2. SELF DIRECTION, SELF CONTROL
3. ACCEPT, SEEK RESPONSIBILITY 4. ABILITY TO MAKE GOOD DECISIONS NORMAL
LEADER BEHAVIOR
Lewin, Lippit, Whyte
Satisfaction Productivity Demo.
Author. Laissez Faire + +
?
+
?
LEADER BEHAVIOR
Ohio State
INIATING STRUCTURE:
STRESS GOALS DEFINES, STRUCTURES ROLES
CONSIDERATION
CONCERN FOR SUBORDINATE’S NEEDS, FEELSINGS
BEHAVIOR MODELS OF LEADERSHIP
Ohio State
IS
Michigan Production Oriented
Managerial Grid
Fiedler
Hershey Blanchard
Task Behavior
Concern for Task Production Oriented
Consideration
Employee Oriented
Concern for Relationship Relationship People Behavior Oriented
LIFE CYCLE
Hersey & Blanchard
HIGH
PARTICIPATING
SELLING
LOW
DELEGATING
TELLING
LOW
HIGH
TASK BEHAVIOR
MODERATE
HIGH
LOW
SUBORDINATE MATURITY
PATH - GOAL
House
4 BEHAVIORS DIRECTIVE SUPPORTIVE ACHIEVEMENT ORIENTED PARTICIPATIVE
DIRECTIVE
INFORMS SUBORDINATES WHAT IS EXPECTED SCHEDULES WORK GIVES SPECIFIC GUIDANCE
SUPPORTIVE
IS FRIENDLY SHOWS CONCERN FOR NEEDS OF SUBORDINATES
ACHIEVEMENT ORIENTED
SETS CHALLENGING GOALS EXPECTS SUBORDINATES TO PERFORM AT THEIR HIGHEST LEVEL
PARTICIPATIVE
CONSULTS WITH SUBORDINATES USES THEIR SUGGESTIONS
FINDINGS
Directive leadership; greater satisfaction when tasks are ambiguous or stressful than when they are highly structured.
FINDINGS
Supportive leadership; higher performance and satisfaction with structured tasks.
FINDINGS
Directive leadership; perceived as redundant by subordinates with high perceived ability or with considerable experience.
FINDINGS
Clear formal authority; use more supportive behavior and less directive.
FINDINGS
Directive leadership; higher satisfaction when substantive conflict within the group.
FINDINGS
Achievement leadership; increases subordinates’ expectancies that effort will lead to high performance when tasks are ambiguous.
FINDINGS
Participative leadership; people with internal locus of control more satisfied with it.
FINDINGS
Directive leadership; people with external locus of control more satisfied with it.
LEADER PARTICIPATION
Vroom & Jago
See participative decision making
CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP
ALSO SEE TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
INFLUENCES PEOPLE TO PERFORM ABOVE NORMAL EXPECTATIONS
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
CHARISMATIC
INSPIRATIONAL
INTELLECTUAL STIMULATION INDIVIDUALIZED CONSIDERATION
PRINCIPLE CENTERED
BEHAVIOR BASE IS PRINCIPLES
HONESTY
FAIRNESS INTEGRITY
ATTRIBUTION THEORY
ATTRIBUTE LEADERSHIP SKILLS TO
SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE PEOPLE IN TRADITIONAL ROLES PEOPLE WE LIKE HIGH STATUS PEOPLE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS/THINGS
Head of the table Height
PRACTICAL APPROACH?
FACTORS IN
THE MANAGER THE SUBORDINATES THE SITUATION
ANALYZE AND BE FLEXIBLE
THE MANAGER
VALUE SYSTEM
BELIEF ABOUT INVOLVING SUBORDINATES
CONFIDENCE IN SUBS. LEADERSHIP INCLINATIONS
DIRECTIVE, SUPPORTIVE
SKILL IN DELEGATING OTHER FACTORS
TOLERANCE FOR AMBIGUITY CONTROL
THE SUBORDINATES
INDEPENDENCE TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR AMBIGUITY INTEREST UNDERSTAND, AGREE WITH GOALS KNOWLEDGE, EXPERIENCE EXPECTATIONS
THE SITUATION
TYPE OF ORGANIZATION
VALUES, CULTURE GEOGRAPHICAL DISPERSION
INFORMATION AVAILABLE? TIME PRESSURE
DIFFICULT TO BE FLEXIBLE?
PERSONALITY STRUCTURED AT VERY EARLY AGE COMPLEX HISTORY OF PAST BEHAVIOR LITTLE FEEDBACK ABOUT CAUSE & EFFECT TOP MANAGEMENT INFLUENCE
SUBSTITUTES FOR LEADERSHIP
PERSONAL FACTORS
LOCUS OF CONTROL
INDEPENDENCE EXPERIENCE
SUBSTITUTES FOR LEADERSHIP
JOB, ORG. FACTORS
ROUTINE
STRUCTURED GOALS, RULES, ETC.
SUBSTITUTES FOR LEADERSHIP
GROUP FACTORS
NORMS
COHESION INFORMAL LEADER