China, the U.S. Dollar and Crude Oil Prices

Document Sample
China, the U.S. Dollar and Crude Oil Prices Powered By Docstoc
					China, the U.S. Dollar and Crude Oil Prices
by G. Allen Brooks       Parks Paton Hoepfl & Brown        Wednesday, April 01, 2009


Crude oil futures through last Friday had climbed 17% since the end of 2008. From the 2008 low
on December 23 of $30.28 a barrel, crude oil futures are up an amazing 73%. In spite of that
dramatic rise, it was less than 120 days ago that crude oil was trading in the mid $50 range. That
speaks to the speed of the collapse of global oil prices and how explosive the recent recovery in
prices has been. The improved oil price has come in the face of weak oil demand worldwide and
growing oil and refined product inventories. If global economic activity has, to quote legendary
investor Warren Buffett, "fallen off the cliff," one has to wonder why oil prices have climbed
from the basement.

A primary reason for the recovery in oil prices has been a general recovery in commodity prices.
According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, investor sentiment has turned positive
triggered by the Federal Reserve's decision to ease credit with its massive $1.125 trillion
liquidity infusion. That decision sparked a rally in almost all commodities - both hard and soft.
The rally was further supported by several positive economic data points - U.S. gasoline
consumption rising, electricity use in China increasing 6% in February, a surprising increase in
housing sales and durable orders. Whether these data points will prove turning points in
sustainable U.S. and/or global economic activity remains to be seen, but market optimists are
viewing them as green shoots in late winter snows.


Another consideration is that the value of the U.S. dollar is falling after an extended period of
strength driven by a flight to quality or security as investors have perceived that the United States
was stronger and would solve its financial and economic challenges sooner than other countries.
When we examine the trend in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to crude oil prices, it is
clear that there largely has been an inverse relationship. As the value of the U.S. dollar was
above 100, oil prices were weak (in the $20s) during most of 2000-2002. As the dollar started to
fall in value, oil prices began to climb. The dollar eventually fell to about 80 at the end of 2004
and oil prices were stronger. During 2005-2006 the dollar rose in value while crude oil prices
also climbed higher - a period that appears to defy the normal pattern between the two.

The dollar's value began to decline in 2007, eventually falling to the 70 range as crude oil prices
rose. The bottom in the value of the dollar coincided with the $147 peak in oil prices in July
2008. From that point forward, the dollar stabilized and began to rise in value as international
investors along with U.S. ones recognized the security of the U.S. dollar in the face of the
exploding global credit crisis. As the dollar's value rose, crude oil prices, along with the prices of
virtually all commodities fell. Now we are seeing the inverse of that pattern as the U.S. dollar has
been weakening as global investors become concerned about the impact of the magnitude of
money being injected into the U.S. banking system and the huge increase in federal government
spending due to the economic stimulus bills.
In the past two weeks U.S. credit markets have witnessed the announcement by the Federal
Reserve that it will be injecting $1.125 billion into the banking system through the purchase of
mortgages, debt of Fannie Mae to help support their mortgage lending efforts and longer-dated
Treasury bills in an effort to lower the yield on government bonds. That action was followed by
the Treasury's announcement of a plan to deal with toxic assets (loans and mortgage related
instruments) on commercial bank balance sheets that are reportedly an inhibitor of bank lending.


We also had a phenomenon of officials from Russia, the European Union, EU member
governments and the head of the European Central Bank criticizing the magnitude of the U.S.
economic stimulus effort. The Bank of China's Governor authored a paper on the bank's web site
suggesting the possible need for a new global reserve currency to replace the U.S. dollar. The
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner initially suggested that the Chinese banker's idea was
something worth considering, but he then quickly retracted that view and reiterated the U.S.
government's official position that the dollar was, and would remain, a strong currency and the
world's reserve currency. Of course between his initial remarks and his correction, the U.S.
dollar's value fell dramatically, but did eventually recover. The impact of the weakening U.S.
dollar and the corresponding rise in crude oil prices can be observed in the chart of the
movement of these two indices over recent days.

The Chinese proposal was supported on Friday by a panel of economists who advise the United
Nations. But what may be one of the most mind-altering proposals was a Congressional
resolution introduced by Representative Michele Bachman (MN-R) that "would bar the dollar
from being replaced by any foreign currency." We shake our head at the lack of understanding
that the Chinese are
proposing a new "reserve currency" and not the replacement of the U.S. dollar as our currency. I
guess this is a case of legislate and then investigate, much as we have experienced with the
economic stimulus bill.


If the Chinese proposal for a new global reserve currency has any merit (and we doubt it does in
any concrete terms), what would be the impact on crude oil prices? We doubt there would be any
since oil is denominated in U.S. dollars and traded globally with no problems. As a business
economist pointed out Friday morning on one of the morning financial television shows,
anybody with a supply of gold could establish a bank in London and declare their currency (gold
backed) to be the new reserve currency for the world. Whether any government would shift its
financial system to that new, self-declared reserve currency and require all financial transactions
and trade be settled in the new currency is questionable. Maybe, if the institution sponsoring the
new currency were solid enough, after 40-50 years, it might create a new reserve currency.
Possibly political, economic and financial events could shorten the time frame, but near-term
there shouldn't be any impact on oil prices.

Given the economic and financial stimulus actions underway, and the political battle over the
proposed Obama Administration's government budget that has just started, we believe the
backdrop for oil prices will be a weakening U.S. dollar value, albeit with brief periods of surging
strength. That overall trend should help support crude oil prices in the low $50s range for the
foreseeable future, baring a significant economic demand collapse or another financial crisis.
Should more positive U.S. economic news emerge over the next few weeks, we would look for
crude oil to solidify its base in that low $50s range. That would likely encourage producers to
start shifting from their bunker mentality, driven by the damage done to their balance sheets and
cash flows from 2008's oil price collapse, to a slightly more optimistic outlook. Unfortunately, an
improved oil price outlook won't help them particularly in dealing with the growing challenges
posed by trends in the North America natural gas market that are wrecking havoc on the
domestic oilfield service industry.
Another consideration regarding any shift in producers' market outlooks is that they cannot
overtly reflect this optimism since it would encourage oilfield service companies to stand firm
against the pressure to reduce prices. With crude oil in the low $50s range, a number of marginal
exploration and development projects become profitable. But successfully forcing drilling rig
and oilfield service costs down across the board might actually have a greater impact on
producer company profitability than the additional marginal projects that suddenly become
profitable. Of course what we are describing is the natural struggle between producers and
service companies over what are fair levels of industry profitability. Until oil and gas prices go
meaningfully higher from current levels, this struggle will be intense and neither side can react to
the oil price recovery with glee.