Presentation of Czech SAO
W
Document Sample


SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE
CZECH REPUBLIC
REPORT FROM DISCUSSION GROUP 3
AUDIT ISSUES FOR
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
VI EUROSAI Training Event
Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies
Prague, 6-8 November
Leadership of Discussion Group:
National Audit Office (Richard Wade)
Presentations and case studies:
Netherlands Court of Audit (Harry Kramer)
State Audit Office of Hungary (Gusztáv Báger)
Alsace Accounting Chamber (Jean François Forestier)
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 2
Netherlands Court of Audit
(Harry Kramer)
• Introduction into PPP in Netherlands
• High Speed Train project from Rotterdam
to Belgium – why this project?
• Public Sector Comparator and Public
Private comparator issues
• Audit findings
• Very hard to stop the PPP process
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 3
Netherlands Court of Audit
(Harry Kramer)
Conclusions:
• If decision is meant to have a financial
basis – the calculation should be checked
• If decision is made on policy grounds – the
implementation should be checked
• A look at risk allocation recommended
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 4
State Audit Office of Hungary
(Gusztáv Báger)
• Informed on general situation of PPP in H.
• 4 major groups of projects (road
infrastructure, large sport facility projects,
educational/cultural investments, prisons
• Problems identified – risk allocation,
contracting, financing
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 5
State Audit Office of Hungary
(Gusztáv Báger)
Some of recommendations:
• Need to balance short term savings in publicly
funded investment with long term efficiency
• Need for capacity building (applies to more
countries)
• Guidelines for planning ahead
• The impact of PPP (cap at 2% annual budget
expenditure)
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 6
Alsace Accounting Chamber
(Jean François Forestier)
Presentation on Water Provision Management Audits
General information:
• almost 37 thousand communes (often very small on population)
• Various types of management – private or run by communes
• Communes are audited every 4 to 6 years and water provision
contracts are always included
• Presentation gave overview on audit procedures, control of contract‘s
provisions, execution and final recommendation
Some of key findings:
• Unbalanced contract negotiations with big contractors from the start
• Unadjusted revision provisions
• Private sector looking for demand risk „upside“ only with protection
from any fall in water consumption
• Special fees paid by companies
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 7
Alsace Accounting Chamber
(Jean François Forestier)
Some of key findings (continued):
• Undue direct costs - scope of work not always relevant to the
paying water consumer
• Unallocated costs
• Replacement costs – inadequate maintenance and renewal –
leading to unjustified profits
Recommendations:
• Amend contracts (audit every 4-6 years in average 12 year
contract)
• Start right (inventory of water service first, performance
indicators)
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 8
Shortly on key note presentations from morning sessions:
National Audit Office (Richard Wade)
PPP Centrum Czech Republic (Libor Cupal)
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 9
National Audit Office
(Richard Wade)
• UK experience to date
• Major audit issues – financial and
performance
• The dangers of off balance sheet
accounting
• A comprehensive audit approach
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 10
PPP Centrum Czech Republic
(Libor Cupal)
• Market development summary
• Standard Project Agreement
• Pilot projects
• Framework / institutional capacity
• Control process
• Conclusions : be realistic, be pragmatic,
look for best practice, diversified focus
important, systematic approach
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 11
Conclusions
PPP audit can have real impact!!!
• Netherlands – reexamination of model
• France- recommendations to protect local
communities from unbalanced contracts
• Hungary – budget planning for the extent
of PPP
• UK – influence on government guidance
• Czech Rep. – a central body to provide
expertise before audit starts
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 12
Thank you for your attention
Radek Majer
radek.majer@nku.cz
www.nku.cz
VI EUROSAI Training Event: Better Auditing of Public Aids and Subsidies 6-8 November 2006 13
Related docs
Get documents about "