WG7 Particle acceleration and transport
Document Sample


WG7: Particle acceleration
and transport
Regular Participants
D. Alexander M. McConnell
M. Aschwanden M. Piana
T. Bastian A. Shih
J. Brown R. Turkmani
S. Christie N. Vilmer
E. Chupp L. Vlahos
C. Dauphin A. Warmuth
M. Gordovsky S. White
J. Gosling T. Winter
G. Hurford V. Zharkova
A.M. Massone And many visitors and invited
speakers (R. Lin, G. Share, E.
Kontar)
Our Goal
Topic I: Signatures of particle acceleration before (pre-event), during
(impulsive phase) and long after the flare.
Topic II: Observational constraints on accelerated particles (energetics,
numbers of accelerated particles, spectral-index evolution, location and
acceleration time).
Topic III: Is the role of magnetic topology important for the acceleration
and transport of high energy particles?
Topic IV: What is the respective role of shocks, stochastic acceleration and
direct E-fields on particle acceleration, with emphasis on the their
interrelation to the energy release process (reconnection).
Topic V: To what extend do the limitations to our current observations
determine the processes involved? Such observational limitations include
not only size-scale issues (both on sub-resolution and large size scales) but
also energy regimes to which observational access is difficult (nonthermal
electrons at low energies in the presence of thermal plasma and ions below
~5MeV). Although the properties of these particles are virtually unobserved,
they may still play a major role in the energetics and the energy release.
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 1: The energy distribution of the
accelerated particles fe,i ( E ) and its
evolution in time (Brown, Kontar,
Massone, Piana, Lin, Share, Vilmer)
Problems: Direct way: accelerated
particles transport on known
magnetic topologies photons
Inverse process: Photons particle
distribution
Mean Electron Spectrum: Temporal evolution
(Kontar)
1234 5 RHESSI Lightcurves
3-12keV;
12-25keV;
25-50keV;
50-300keV
Temporal evolution of the 3
Regularized Mean Electron
Spectrum (20s time intervals)
12 4 5
Accelerated (injected) Electron Spectrum(Kontar)
Accelerated (injected) electron spectrum for a thick-target model:
Temporal evolution of the
Regularized Accelerated 3
Electron Spectrum
(20s time intervals)
12 4 5
Electron spectrum at 1AU
Typical electron spectrum can
be fitted with broken power law:
Break around: 30-100 keV
Steeper at higher energies
Oakley, Krucker, & Lin 2004
Solar energetic particles at 1AU (Krucker-Kontar)
Evidence for Electron Spectral Hardening (Share)
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 2: Very high energy particle
(Vilmer)
-ray and neutron event on 24/05/90 (Vilmer)
High Energy -rays From Talon et al., 1993
Debrunner et al 1997
Solar neutrons
PHEBUS/GRANAT observations
Deduced solar neutron
production time profile
(i.e. pion time profile)
NM CLIMAX observations
of solar neutrons
and prediction for a time
extended neutron production
Spectral evolution of
high-energy -rays
Background subtracted count spectra
From PHEBUS/GRANAT
Full line: one of the best fits with
electron and pion contributions
Dotted line: electron contribution
Background subtracted count spectrum -ray lines
From 300 keV to 100 MeV
Full line: one of the best fits with one
electron bremsstrahlung component
& pion contribution
Dotted line: electron component
Electron bremsstrahlung component:
Ae= 1 10 5 = 2 Eroll= 40 MeV
Proton component:
=2 Ntot= 8 1031 Emax= 750 MeV
Vilmer et al, 2003
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 3: Anisotropies
f ( E, )
(Alexander, McConnell, Bastian)
Asymmetric footpoints (Alexander)
I1
F1
F2
Following AM02 we define the footpoint photon asymmetry as
I 2 I1
A
I 2 I1
where Ii denotes the count rate at footpoint i. For perfect symmetry
A = 0 and for perfect asymmetry A = ±1.
X-ray Polarization studies
First analysis includes four events :
– 1) 23-July-2002
– 2) 21-April-2002
– 3) 03-November-2003
– 4) 10-November-2004
Only the July 23rd event shows evidence of
polarization (at the 20% level in the 20-40 keV
energy range).
Polarization angle not consistent with beamed
emission at footpoint. Perhaps beamed emission
with looptop source?!? Or pancake distribution at
footpoint?!?
(McConnell)
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 4: How many particles are accelerated?
Estimates with the current modeling suggest that: The
rate of particle acceleration is
1037 particles / sec
so for atypical flare 1039 particle should be accelerated
Typical volume for a loop 1028 cm3 and density 1010
/cm3 In secs all particles of the loop should be
accelerated and the loop should be refiled ten times. For
the CS the situation is much worst….Possible Solution
Evaporation of heated plasma + return current heating
(Gordovskyy and Zharkova)
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 5: Magnetic topology (S. White,
Alexander) and its role on acceleration
and transport…
Complexity vs simplicity
Flare in which Fe XII shows a
simple arcade late in the event
and HXR come from top of
arcade as in Y-type
reconnection: but radio
emission shows very complex
structure early on.
In this flare
geometry evolved
from complex to
simple: not
consistent with
standard arcade
reconnection
model. (S. White)
Flare in which Fe XII and HXR come from a small location at
front of the region while synchrotron-loop and 1600 A continuum
come from very distant location: requires a very complex
magnetic geometry with long-distance connections. Where was
the energy release? (S. White)
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 5: Time delays
and time of flight
measurements
(Aschwanden)
Generally, the HXR pulses
or fine structure show
TOF delays,
While the lowpass-filtered
flux shows delays of
opposite sign (trapping)
50- 180 keV
Time delays in -ray line
emission can be as small 275- 325 keV
as <2 sec to as large as
10’s of sec.
-ray line emission in 4 – 6.4 MeV
2002 July 23 flare may
be delayed by ~10 sec |-----20 sec----|
from hard X-rays.
What does this say
50- 180 keV
about acceleration-
transport? Could be 275- 325 keV
accounted for by
trapping or is it intrinsic
to the acceleration 4 – 6.4 MeV
process? (Share)
|------100 sec------|
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 6: Energetic: Almost 30-50% of
the energy released goes to high energy
particles
Question: Is the flare process MHD or
kinetic phenomenon?
Characteristics of Particle
accelerator in the sun
Theme 7: Helium and Heavy ion
acceleration
Theme 8: Long lasting acceleration (hours
after the flare (Vilmer, Dauphin)
Theme 9: Supper hot tail in the solar
wind withought a flares
Core
=>
solar wind plasma
electrons Solar Wind
Electrons
Halo/Strahl
=> heat flux from ~106 K
corona
Superhalo
=>
remnant from coronal
heating or solar wind
acceleration?
Can the existing flare models
satisfy all the above constrains?
The only model that can satisfy only a few
of the above constrains is the stochastic
acceleration model but has no connection
to energy release
The Big Questions
Are the existing models for particle
acceleration connected with the energy
release in solar flares? - NO!
Is there any model which satisfy all the
above constrains? ---NO
Theoretical ideas
Acceleration of particles inside stressed
magnetic loop (Turkmani)
PARTICLE ENERGY SPECTRA AT ACCELERATION IN an RCS
WITH a GUIDING FIELD (Zharkova)
Evidence for particle acceleration at the
termination shock (Warmuth)
Acceleration of particles in force free extrapolated
magnetic fields (Azner-Vlahos)
Acceleration model (Turkmani)
Acceleration takes place in stochastic
current sheets’ regions developed as a
result of the dynamic which the
photospheric driving introduces to the
corona.
Macroscopic description (MHD) (Galsgaard)
The loop model (Galsgaard)
3D MHD experiment of photospherically
driven slender magnetic flux tubes
Continued random driving of the foot points
(incompressible sinusoidal large scale shear
motions )
Reconnection jets generate secondary
perturbations in B
Formation of stochastic current sheets
Electric field
E = -(u x B) + J
Inductive Resistive
Time evolution and
Distribution functions (Turkmani)
Accepted current sheet scheme
(Zaharkova)
Energy spectra: e (blue) and p (black)
upper panel – neutral, middle – semi-neutral,
lower – fully separated beams (Zharkova)
1.8 for p 1.8 for p
2.2 for e 2.2 for e
1.7 for p 4-5 for p
4-5 for e 2.0 for e
1.5 for p 1.8 for e
Related docs
Get documents about "