Kansas Nebraska Act - DOC by Crizlap


									Kansas-Nebraska Act
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854 by the United States Congress to deal with the opening
of the central Midwest to continuing American settlement.
By 1852, white Americans desired to move into the area that comprises modern-day Kansas. Many
white farmers coveted the land along the Kansas and Platte Rivers, believing that it would make
profitable farms. Businessmen and farmers alike also desired a transcontinental railroad. Many of these
people favored a route passing through Kansas. A railroad across the United States would allow
Eastern industrialists a cheaper and faster way to transport their products to the burgeoning population
of the West. It would also allow Western farmers an easier means of transporting their crops to the
major cities of the East.
Two problems existed for the people desiring the white settlement of Kansas. First, the federal
government had promised this territory to Native Americans. Before white settlement could take place,
government officials had to move the natives. Secondly, this territory was part of the Louisiana
Purchase Territory. Under the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the land that would become the Kansas
and Nebraska Territories had to be "free states" where slavery would not be permitted. Many white
Southerners opposed this provision. They hoped to maintain a balance in the United States Senate to
prevent the passing of laws that might affect slavery across the rest of the United States. Until
California's admittance to the United States in 1850, the North and the South had maintained an equal
number of senators from "slave" and "free" states in the United States Senate. The North currently had
the advantage in the Senate. Due to its greater population than the South, the North also had control of
the United States House of Representatives. If Kansas and Nebraska were opened to settlement and
became free states by the Missouri Compromise, many white Southerners feared that they would never
be able to regain an equal balance with the North in the Senate.
In 1853, Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas proposed creating the Nebraska Territory. The House of
Representatives quickly passed the bill, but the Senate refused to vote on the measure. Southern
senators informed Douglas that slavery must be permitted in the Nebraska Territory or they would not
support the bill. Douglas knew that such a bill would outrage many white Northerners, including his
own constituents. Douglas introduced a rewritten version of his bill in 1854, this time stating that the
eligible voters in the territory would decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery. Allowing
the voters to decide the issue was known as popular sovereignty. While Southern senators liked this bill
much more than Douglas's original version, they still feared that Nebraska would become a free state.
In yet another version of the bill, Douglas called for the creation of two territories, Kansas and
Nebraska, and also explicitly stated that the Missouri Compromise would no longer remain in effect.
Southern senators accepted this bill. Not only did the repeal of the Missouri Compromise open the
entire Louisiana Purchase Territory yet to become states to slavery, it also gave Southerners two
opportunities to create two slave states out of Kansas and Nebraska.
While Douglas had now gained enough support to pass his bill in the United States Senate, he faced
opposition from President Franklin Pierce. Pierce believed that the Missouri Compromise had kept
peace between white Northerners and Southerners, and he did not want to repudiate a government act
that had worked so well. Several Southern senators visited Pierce in the White House and gave him an
ultimatum, either support Douglas's Kansas-Nebraska Act or lose all political support that the president
currently enjoyed in the South. Pierce gave in to the senators.
Many white Northerners opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in its final form. Salmon Chase, a senator
from Ohio, denounced the bill. Believing that slavery violated Christian precepts, some opponents
objected to slavery on moral grounds, while other people simply did not want to compete economically
with slaveowners if slavery was permitted in Kansas and Nebraska. All of the bill's opponents, whether
on economic or moral grounds, objected to the possible expansion of slavery. The bill passed both
houses of Congress. Most members of the Democratic Party endorsed it, while members of the Free
Soil Party condemned it. The Whig Party's members split along regional lines with Northern Whigs
opposing it and Southern Whigs endorsing the legislation. The Whig Party collapsed as a result of the
regional divisions caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In Ohio, the Kansas-Nebraska Act led to the
creation of the Fusion Party, a precursor of the Republican Party, in 1854. The Kansas-Nebraska Act
also led to "Bleeding Kansas," a mini civil war that erupted in Kansas in 1856. Many Northerners and
Southerners went to Kansas in 1854 and 1855, determined to convert the future state to their view on
slavery. To ensure that their respective side would win, both Southerners and Northerners, including
Ohioans like John Brown and Henry Ward Beecher, advocated the use of violence.
The divisions between North and South were widening and would eventually lead to Civil War.

To top