May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-HANSEN

Reviews
Shared by: Ryan Colwell
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
73
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
10/31/2007
language:
English
pages:
0
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-85 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JANINE H. HANSEN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 9861-05S. Filed May 23, 2006. Janine H. Hansen, pro se. David W. Sorensen, for respondent. FOLEY, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74631 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. The decision to be entered Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 1 - 2 is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority. The issues for decision are whether petitioner is liable for tax relating to unreported income and for the section 6651(a)(1) and (2) additions to tax relating to 2000, 2001, and 2002. Background Petitioner is the president of the State of Nevada Eagle Forum, a State chapter of the National Eagle Forum. In 2000, 2001, and 2002, petitioner annually received $6,000 of nonemployee compensation from a foundation associated with the National Eagle Forum (the foundation), yet petitioner did not file tax returns relating to those years. In a notice of deficiency dated April 5, 2005, respondent determined that petitioner is liable for tax deficiencies totaling $2,544, section 6651(a)(1) additions to tax for failure to file a return, and section 6651(a)(2) additions to tax for failure to timely pay taxes relating to 2000, 2001, and 2002. At trial, on January 30, 2006, respondent moved for the imposition of a section 6673(a)(1) penalty. On May 31, 2005, petitioner, while residing in Sparks, Nevada, filed her petition. Discussion Petitioner concedes that she received income and failed to report the amounts determined by respondent. Petitioner - 3 contends, however, that she is not liable for tax on these payments because of her religious beliefs. The Supreme Court has held that “Because the broad public interest in maintaining a sound tax system is of such a high order, religious belief in conflict with the payment of taxes affords no basis for resisting the tax.” United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 260 (1982); see also Adams v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 137 (1998), affd. 170 F.3d 173 (3d Cir. 1999). Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the See sec. tax relating to the payments from the foundation. 61(a). Respondent bears, and has met, the burden of production with respect to the section 6651(a)(1) and (2) additions to tax. sec. 7491(c); Rule 142(a). Petitioner does not meet the See requirements of any exception to section 6651(a)(1) or (2). Accordingly, respondent’s determinations are sustained. Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446 (2001). Respondent contends that petitioner’s position is frivolous and that, pursuant to section 6673(a)(1), the Court should impose a penalty on petitioner. We, however, conclude that it is not See appropriate to impose such a penalty in this case. Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or meritless. - 4 To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered.

Shared by: Ryan Colwell
About
I heart Excel!
Other docs by Ryan Colwell
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-SPENCER
Views: 209  |  Downloads: 1
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-SHINAULT
Views: 132  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-ROSSMAN
Views: 147  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-ROSEN
Views: 149  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-PROWSE
Views: 110  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-PILLAY
Views: 118  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-PEOPL
Views: 96  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-PARKER
Views: 132  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-MURRAY
Views: 95  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-MILLER
Views: 98  |  Downloads: 0
June-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-LYNN
Views: 48  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-GUTHRIE
Views: 47  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-PECK
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-FORD
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-MARS
Views: 46  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-KNOX
Views: 49  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-DIXONOPN
Views: 141  |  Downloads: 1
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-CHIZER
Views: 37  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-DEHONEY
Views: 51  |  Downloads: 0
May-2006 Tax Court Opinion Ruling Case-FELDER
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0