Docstoc

august

Document Sample
august Powered By Docstoc
					Ontario County Planning Board
Draft Minutes for August 13, 2008 Introduction 2 General Procedures 2 Legal Obligations for Referring Agencies 2 Staff Summaries & Board Action Note: The page numbers listed below refer to the applicable board action. App # 124-08 125-08 127-08 128-08 129-08 130-08 131-08 132-08 133-08 134-08 135-08 Municipality Town of Victor Town of Victor Town of Gorham Town of Victor Town of Victor Town of Canandaigua Town of Canandaigua Town of Canandaigua Town of Canandaigua Town of Canandaigua Town of Farmington Applicant Turvic Partners, LLC Turvic Partners, LLC William Freese DeFelice Development, Inc North Forest Office Providers RSM West Lake Rd, LLC RSM West Lake Rd, LLC RSM West Lake Rd, LLC RSM West Lake Rd, LLC RSM West Lake Rd, LLC Farmington Town Board Page Application Type # Text Amendment 11 Map Amendment 11 Site Plan 4 Site Plan 13 Site Plan 14 Area Variance 6, 7 Area Variance 6, 7 Special Use Permit 6, 7 Site Plan 6, 7 Subdivision 6, 7 Map Amendment 10

-1-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008

- Introduction This document will serve as both the draft minutes for the Ontario County Planning Board and as the Official Notice of Findings and Decision for the applications heard by the CPB. It can also be viewed at the Ontario County Planning Department Website: http://www.co.ontario.ny.us/planning/cpbsch.htm

- General Procedures The Ontario County Planning Board meets once each month to review referred local actions for intermunicipal and countywide impacts. They are separated into two categories: Class 1 & Class 2. Class 1’s are applications that the CPB has formally decided have little potential intermunicipal or countywide impact. The CPB will identify such an impact for Class 2 applications before voting to approve, modify or deny.

- Legal Obligations for Referring Agencies Class 1
If an application has been returned to the referring agency as a Class I, then the only requirement is that they consider any Board comments forwarded to them by the CPB. Referring agencies are asked to read any Board Comments into the minutes of a meeting or hearing held for the subject application.

Class 2
If the CPB has voted to deny or modify a referred application then the local board needs a majority plus one vote of their full board to act contrary to that decision. CPB approvals without modification require no extraordinary local action. However, in all cases, the referring agency is still required to consider CPB comments as they would for Class 1 applications.

- Incomplete Applications Referrals need to meet the definition of “full statement of such proposed action” in NYS General Municipal Law. The CPB’s determination regarding the completeness of a particular application is supported by factual findings and is made, whenever practical, after consulting with the submitting official or the chairs of referring agencies. The CPB will not make a recommendation on an application that they have determined to be incomplete. NYS General Municipal Law, Article 12-b Section 239-m (c)

- Reporting back to the CPB “Report of final action. Within thirty days after final action, the referring body shall file a report of the final action it has taken with the county planning agency or regional planning council. A referring body which acts contrary to a recommendation of modification or disapproval of a proposed action shall set forth the reasons for the contrary action in such report.” NYS General Municipal Law, Article 12-b Section 239-m, Part 6.

-2-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008

County Planning Board Members Cities: Canandaigua - John Thompson Towns: Bristol Canandaigua Farmington Gorham Manchester Phelps Seneca Victor

Geneva - Mary Bogin - Stephen Groet* - Arthur Babcock* - Alan Deuel* - Vacant - Terrence Hopper* - Bruce Campbell* - Peter Osborne* - Richard DelVecchio, Vice Chair

- Vacant Canadice - Mary Prince* East Bloomfield - Mary Neale* Geneva - George McCadden Hopewell - Jaylene Folkins, Chair* Naples - Glen Wilkes* Richmond - Clifford Kunes* South Bristol - John Palomaki* West Bloomfield

Names in bold are members that also serve on a local Legislative body, Planning Board or ZBA. * Indicates attendance at the meeting Ex-Officio Members Present Kristen Hughes – Ontario County Planning Department Tim Jensen – Ontario County Planning Department Guests Doug Eldred Chris Rogers Robert Brancato

Steve Mancini Greg McMahon

Ron Brand Dave Degear

Tom Walsh Scott Ganyo

The meeting began with a ½ hour presentation by staff on referral review process and criteria described by NYS General Municipal Law. After the training, there was informal discussion about the upcoming CPB picnic. The tentative date is Sunday, September 21st. The location is Gannet Hill Park. Staff gave a brief demonstration of the link to the County’s website with staff summaries and additional links to scanned site plans. Members indicated that they liked the idea and would like additional information such as air photos. Roll was taken. 12 members were present. Note: the actions described below are not necessarily listed in order of occurrence. Noting one correction was needed (labeling 117-08 as a Class 2) John Palomaki made a motion that was seconded by Bruce Campbell to accept the draft July, 2008 minutes as submitted. Glen Wilkes abstained from voting The motion passed with a unanimous vote (11)

-3-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008

Class 1’s
127 - 2008
Type: Applicant: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location: Town of Gorham Planning Board Site Plan William Freese 141.00-1-38.000 48' x 60' warehouse addition (Rush Machinery) East side of State Rt 364, 2,200’ south of County Road 11 Class: 1

Staff Summary: The building will be located behind an existing 130’ x 40’ barn over a lawn area. The lot currently accommodates the business and a single family home and two-car garage. All are accessed from a single cur cut on State Rt 364. The zoning is AG Agricultural. The use is operating under a special use permit. The development will not infringe on any mapped wetlands or floodplains. Citing a lack of potential countywide or intermunicipal impact, Stephen Groet made a motion that was seconded by Glen Wilkes to abstain from making a formal recommendation on application 12708 and to send all Board comments to the referring agency for their consideration. The motion passed by a unanimous vote (17)

Class 2’s
130 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Property Owner: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location: Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals Class: 2 Area Variance 130 thru 134-08 RSM West Lake Rd, LLC German Brothers Marina BME Associates 112.00-1-24.100 & 113.13-1-10.000 West Lake Marine Club - Variances for lakeside club house and pump house. Both sides of County Road 16, 1,000’ south of Wyffels Rd

Staff Summary: Public water and sewer are available. About ¼ of the development area (closest to the lakeshore) is zoned lakefront residential with a minimum lot size of 20,000sf. The remaining land is being considered zoned 1ac Residential (SCR-1). The overall development area is 75.6ac. The applicant is proposing to purchase a lakefront parcel (3.5ac) currently used as a commercial marina and redevelop most of it as “private water oriented recreational facility” for use by the residents of the proposed 70 single family homes on the upland side. The proposed development requires several variances for the lakefront redevelopment and the single family residential as well as subdivision for the residential portion and a special use permit and site plan for the lakefront development. A special use permit is needed for the private water oriented recreational facility. The Town has indicated that additional variances may be referred as the review moves forward. A single curb cut along County Road 16 will provide the sole access to 67 of the residential lots. The recreational facility will include a 4,000sf private clubhouse, 750sf storage building and fuel -4-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 sales office, dock with fuel pump, sun deck, and docking facilities. 60 parking spaces will be located on the upland side of County Road 16. 6 spaces will be on the lakeside. Local law does not allow off street parking to be separated from the use by a public ROW. Additional variances needed for the lakefront development are described in the following table. It should be noted that the lot is 90’ between County Road 16 and the lakeshore Description Setback from County Road 16 (Club house) Rear yard (lake side) setback (Clubhouse) Setback from Mean High Water line (Clubhouse) Setback from County Road 16 (pump house) Rear yard (lake side) setback (pump house) Setback from Mean High Water line (pump house) Proposed 40’ 5’ 5’ 28’ 8’ 8’ Required 60’ 40’ 25’ 60’ 40’ 25’

Additional variances will be needed for the upland residential development: Description Minimum front building setback (lots 7-13) Maximum building height (lots 1-3, 5,6,7-15) Minimum lot width (lot 14) Minimum lot width (lot 15) Proposed 30’ 35’ 88’ 15’ Required 60’ 25’ 125’ 125’

The applicant is also requesting that lots 7-15 be relocated to the SCR-1 zone but not be counted toward the density requirement. Docking and Moorings – The existing marina has 68 seasonal dock or mooring spaces for boats. They also have storage for 35 boats on the other side of County Road 16. The applicant is proposing to have 135 permanent spaces, including 9 for visitors. Drainage – For the residential subdivision, runoff will be directed to 6 detention ponds that will eventually outlet through existing culverts to Canandaigua Lake. Applicant maintains that the plan will keep runoff at or below current rates. Water quality was also addressed and though it is expected to degrade, the applicant contends that the facilities are designed to meet NYSDEC requirements. Remediation of Contaminated Lakefront Soils – In February of 2007, a plan was accepted by NYSDEC to clean up contaminated soils on the lakefront property. The plan includes removal and replacement of highly contaminated soils with clean fill. Subsequent ground water monitoring would determine if additional clean up was necessary. Should the applicant not be allowed to move forward with the full plan for site redevelopment the marina would continue in its current state and an alternative plan for clean up would be implemented, including removal of a smaller amount of soil and on site treatment of the remaining contaminated soil and groundwater. Traffic – 77 trips were estimated for the weekday PM peak hour. 72 trips for the Saturday morning

-5-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 peak. It is anticipated that all turning movements at the Wyffels Rd intersection with County Road 16 will continue to function at a Level of Service of “A”. The entrance onto County Road 16 is expected to operate at a level “B” and better. At the CRC meeting the applicant gave a presentation and answered questions from staff and board members. The applicant indicated that boats using the docks would enter and exit the water at this site, though by appointment with the manager of the facility. Applicant also indicated that based on other studies only 16 boats are expected to be in use at any given time, even during times of peak use. At the full Board meeting, Doug Eldred requested to give a presentation but was advised that staff would be making the presentation and that the members would direct requests for additional information from others as needed. Staff then gave a brief overview of the project using air photos and colored renderings supplied with the application. The Chair asked if anyone would like to speak and advised them that input would be limited to five minutes or so after which the Board would begin deliberations. Robert Brancato spoke and addressed issues of water quality, community character and impacts to residents across the lake. Additional discussion centered on a broad range of issues including the nature of the variances, alternative development scenarios, use of the lakefront building, options for parking, boat storage and secondary access for the residential subdivision. The applicant indicated that reserving the building for special events such as graduations, weddings, etc would not be an option. Members expressed concern that parking for such events would be inadequate. After discussion several motions were made: Citing potential negative impacts to community character and water quality, Terrence Hopper made a motion that was seconded by Stephen Groet to recommend denial of all variances related to the lakefront portion of the development (referral 130-08). The motion failed by a vote of 9 in favor and 3 against. Staff reminded members that 10 votes in favor of a motion are needed to take action by an 18member board. Cliff Kunes then made a motion that was seconded by Alan Deuel to recommend approval of referral 130-08 The motion failed by a vote of 7 in favor and 5 against. After additional discussion, Alan Deuel made a motion that was seconded by Glen Wilkes to recommend approval of the variances related to the residential subdivision (referral 131-08) The motion failed by a vote of 8 in favor and 4 against. Peter Osborne then made a motion that was seconded by Alan Deuel to recommend approval of the lot width and building setback variances, excluding the building height variances, for the residential development (referral 131-08) The motion failed by a vote of 8 to 4 Findings 1. The lot in question is located on the lakefront and upland sides of County Road 16 2. The request is for a 4,000sf clubhouse for use by residents of the 70-unit development.

-6-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 3. The CPB is concerned that improper placement and development of such a structure could have negative impacts on public safety, traffic congestion along County Road 16, and the water quality of Canandaigua Lake. 4. It is the position of this Board that the subject lot affords enough options for a building location and design that will minimize the potential impacts described above. Based on the above findings, Terrence Hopper made a motion that was seconded by Peter Osborne to forward a recommendation of approval and all Board comments to the referring agency for referral 132-08 (special use permit) The motion passed by a unanimous vote (12) Glen Wilkes then made four separate motions, all of which were seconded by Bruce Campbell to abstain from making a formal recommendation at this time and forward all Board comments to the referring agencies for applications 130-08 (lakefront variances), 131-08 (subdivision variances), 133-08 (clubhouse site plan) and 134-08 (residential subdivision) All four motions passed by a unanimous vote (12) Board Comments: 1. The plan for remediation should include a time schedule acceptable to the Town, for full clean up of the site. Clean up should precede any re-use or redevelopment of the site. 2. The Town and applicant should work together to ensure the HOA is protected from having to fund the costs of remediation should plans change and the building not be removed. 3. The Town should have the Ontario County Soil & Water Conservation district review the plans for storm water and erosion control. 4. The setback between the clubhouse and gas pump appears to conflict with the intent of existing standards in local law that require a specific distance between gas stations and places of public assembly. The Town is strongly encouraged to consider applying those standards in this case. 5. How will the boats be brought in and out of the water? If it is to occur on this site what is the plan for ensuring that this activity, especially with the anticipated increase in the number of users, does not impede traffic along County Road 16? 6. Will the private water oriented public facility be open for use by the general public? Will this impact its’ status as “private?” 7. The Town may want to consider what options they have for future expansions to the parking area on the west side of County Road 16 8. Limited parking and the potential for special events to be held at the lakeside clubhouse are a concern. If the plans for the lakefront redevelopment are approved, use restrictions in the homeowner’s agreement and elsewhere should limit occupancy and use of the structure to a level appropriate given the limited parking. 9. There is a concern regarding the height variances for the homes and the detrimental impact the taller homes will likely have on views, including those from across the lake. 10. The Town and applicant are encouraged to implement green building practices such as permeable pavement and dark sky compliant lighting. 11. The Town should insist upon cross access between the adjacent residential subdivision and this proposal to provide a second means of access. -7-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008

131 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance 130 thru 134-08 RSM West Lake Rd, LLC BME Associates 112.00-1-24.100 & 113.13-1-10.000 West Lake Marine Club - Variances for conservation subdivision Both sides of County Road 16, 1,000’ south of Wyffels Rd

Class: 2

Staff Summary: Refer to application 130-08 for a full description of the proposal

132 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Canandaigua Planning Board Class: 2 Special Use Permit 130 thru 134-08 RSM West Lake Rd, LLC BME Associates 112.00-1-24.100 & 113.13-1-10.000 West Lake Marine Club - Special use permit for a "private water oriented recreational facility" Both sides of County Road 16, 1,000’ south of Wyffels Rd

Staff Summary: Refer to application 130-08 for a full description of the proposal

133 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Canandaigua Planning Board Class: 2 Site Plan 130 thru 134-08 RSM West Lake Rd, LLC BME Associates 112.00-1-24.100 & 113.13-1-10.000 West Lake Marine Club - Site plan review for 71-lot clustered residential subdivision on 58ac with lakefront clubhouse, docks, and pump house. Both sides of County Road 16, 1,000’ south of Wyffels Rd

Staff Summary: Refer to application 130-08 for a full description of the proposal

134 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Canandaigua Planning Board Subdivision 130 thru 134-08 RSM West Lake Rd, LLC BME Associates 112.00-1-24.100 & 113.13-1-10.000 West Lake Marine Club - Subdivision review for 71-lot clustered residential subdivision on 58ac. Both sides of County Road 16, 1,000’ south of Wyffels Rd

Class: 2

-8-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 Staff Summary: Refer to application 130-08 for a full description of the proposal

135 - 2008
Type: Applicant: Property Owner: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Farmington Town Board Class: 2 Map Amendment Farmington Town Board Farmington 332 LLC McMahon Larue Associates, PC 29.00-1-23.100 Rezoning 62.7ac from General Business and Restricted Business to Incentive Zoning to allow a mix of business, commercial, residential & Senior Housing Both sides of State Rt 332, 1/3 mile south of State Rt 96

Staff Summary: The applicant has submitted a concept plan that a shows full development of both the east and west portions of the lot. The uses are a mix of senior housing, single-family residential, commercial, office and an extended stay hotel. Each use would be located within one of seven separate lots to be created by a subdivision. The rezoning would not become final until the planning board had approved a subdivision and site plan for one of the seven lots. The first phase will be the senior housing. Public water and sewer are available. Access would be from a driveway onto State Rt 332. The concept plan also shows, on the west side of State Rt 332 cross access to adjacent parcels to the north (Aldi’s) and to Hathaway Dr to the south. At full development about 30 acres would be converted to building or pavement. The traffic analysis estimates 454 additional trips will enter and leave the site during the am peak hour and 944 trips during the pm peak hour. Applicant estimates that 418 (am) and 812 (pm) will be new trips generated by the development. No level of service analysis was completed. A preliminary drainage analysis indicates there is capacity on site to mitigate impacts of increased runoff. There are no wetlands mapped for the site At the CRC meeting the applicant and Town staff summarized the proposal and answered questions. Staff asked what benefits the Town would derive from this development in exchange for the rezoning/increased density. Ron Brand replied that increased pedestrian access, cross access to adjacent parcels to the north and south, more direct access though the parcel on the east side of State Rt 332 to the Finger Lakes Race Track, and increased storm water detention to mitigate flooding problems in the existing residential subdivision to the south were all benefits. He also indicated that he was working with NYSDOT to signalize the site access intersection with State Rt 332. At the full Board meeting staff delivered an overview of the proposal. Dave Degear, chair of the Farmington Planning Board answered questions from the Board and voiced his support for the proposed rezoning. Mr McMahon was also on hand to answer questions. Board Comments: 1. The Town and applicant should consider modifying site layouts to place the majority of parking behind buildings or in a location that protect the appearance of the State Rt 332 corridor. 2. Room for buffering and landscaping between the uses and State Rt 332 is also recommended. 3. Can the development around the senior housing be scaled back or redesigned to allow more

-9-

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 green space and buffering? Can the single-family residential portion be clustered to provide more room? Given that the senior housing is for independent living is the parking sufficient? The Town is encouraged to explore options for shared parking to reduce pavement. Dark sky lighting and other green building practices are highly recommended. The Town is also encouraged to explore options for design elements suitable for a Town center and the State Rt 332 corridor. The Town and applicant are commended for working together to create a reasonable long-term whole parcel plan for this area.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Findings 1. State Rt 332 has been identified by the CPB as a primary travel corridor for tourists visiting Ontario County 2. Canandaigua and Farmington have worked with NYS DOT to adopt and implement a plan for access management along State Rt 332. 3. Large sale development along the State Rt 332 corridor has an intermunicipal impact as it relates to community character, tourism and traffic flow. 4. Such development also has an impact on water quality. 5. The proposal is a full build out concept for 62.7ac. 6. The plan provides for cross access to the north south and east. 7. This will minimize additional curb cuts and facilitate proper access and development of parcels fronting on State Rt 332. 8. The Town has also been working with NYS DOT on a plan to signalize the site drive intersection with State Rt 332. 9. The CPB has historically supported whole parcel planning as a logical approach to addressing potential impacts. 10. It is the position of this Board that the parcel is suitable for the proposed development and that remaining potential negative impacts can be mitigated through site plan review. Based on the above findings Terrence Hopper made a motion that was seconded by Mary Neale to forward a recommendation of approval and all Board comments to the referring agency for referral 135-08. The motion passed by a unanimous vote (12).

124 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Victor Town Board Class: 2 Text Amendment 125-08 Turvic Partners, LLC 6.00-2-5.100 Amendment of the existing Forest Park Planned Development District South of Turk Hill Rd, 850’ east of State Rt 96

Staff Summary: The Forest Park PDD consists of two parcels (about 3½ac) just north and east of Eastview Mall and Cobblestone Court. The existing zoning allows a mix of low intensity retail, - 10 -

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 office uses and residential. The CPB reviewed a referral adding residential to the list of allowed uses in July of 2007. That application was sent back as a Class 1 with no comments. The proposed use would be a two-story 22,000sf building with 120 parking spaces on 2.1ac. The proposed uses are retail and office. Access is from Turk Hill Rd. It’s estimated that 236 trips will enter and exit the site during the PM peak hour. The left turn out of the site will experience an average delay of 20 seconds (LOS C). The right, 14 seconds (LOS B). Applicant anticipates adequate queuing distance for those entering and exiting the site but recommends painting in a southbound turn lane within the existing median to facilitate more efficient entrance into the site. The Town’s engineer indicates that based on the traffic report, the development will not have a significant impact on nearby intersections. At the full Board meeting, John Palomaki left the meeting room before deliberation and vote on referrals 124-08 and 125-08. Board Comments: 1. The current proposal appears to represent a significant increase, over past proposals, in the intensity of use including lot coverage. The Town is strongly encouraged to a complete and thorough review under SEQR independent of those done for past proposals. 2. The traffic analysis should take into account the potential impacts to the Turk Hill Rd intersection with State Rt 96. 3. The proposal should provide for cross access between parcels. 4. This PDD should have a site coverage percentage, site layout, buffering, etc consistent with existing standards in the zoning and elsewhere (comp plan). 5. The Town should also consider requiring buffering to protect the nearby senior housing development. 6. This proposal appears to be typical commercial development. A simple solution may be to simply rezone the lot to the Commercial and apply existing standards. 7. The Town should work with the Town of Perinton to address potential intermunicipal impacts of this development. Findings 1. The proposal is for 22,000sf of retail and office space. 2. The proposal appears to represent a significant increase in the intensity of use including lot coverage. 3. The traffic analysis submitted with referral did not address potential impacts to State Rt 96. 4. Traffic flow along State Rt 96 and in proximity to Eastview Mall is an intermunicipal and countywide issue. Based on the above findings Glen Wilkes made a motion that was seconded by Clifford Kunes to forward a recommendation of approval, with modification, and all Board comments to the referring agency for application 124-08 & 125-08. Modification: The application will include a full analysis of the potential impacts from this development to the intersection of Turk Hill Rd and State Rt 96. John Palomaki abstained from deliberating and voting.

- 11 -

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 The motion passed by a unanimous vote (11)

125 - 2008
Type: Related Referrals: Applicant: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description: Location:

Town of Victor Town Board Class: 2 Map Amendment 124-08 Turvic Partners, LLC 6.00-2-5.100 Amendment of the existing Forest Park Planned Development District South of Turk Hill Rd, 850’ east of State Rt 96

Staff Summary: Refer to application 124-08, above.

128 - 2008
Type: Applicant: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description:

Town of Victor Planning Board

Class: 2

Site Plan DeFelice Development, Inc LU Engineers 15.00-2-14.21 Modification to an existing site plan to allow development of a 48,475sf building with parking (FLCC Victor Campus) Location: West of the intersection of State Rt 251 and Victor Heights Parkway

Staff Summary: The 24ac lot is zoned Light Industrial and has access to public water and sewer. The proposal is for a two-story building and parking with access to State Rt 251 and Victor Heights Parkway. A future expansion of 21,810sf is also planned. The site was previously approved (2001) for 82,000sf of building with parking. The previously approved storm water facilities are already installed. Victor Heights parkway also serves to access surrounding land uses are primarily light industrial. Applicant has submitted estimates of peak traffic significantly less than what was expected for the previously approved development. The site entrance will remain at a level of service “B” with average delay of 12.3sec (am peak hour) and 13.1sec (pm). Board Comments: 1. The Town is encouraged to require dark sky compliant lighting and green building practices such as permeable pavement. Findings 1. Continued development of the Finger Lakes Community College is a countywide concern as it impacts overall quality of life in Ontario County. 2. In addition, large scale developments of this nature can have intermunicipal impacts on traffic drainage and community character 3. The CPB has historically supported proper development and growth of the FLCC and related functions. 4. It is the position of this Board that the site has adequate infrastructure to support the proposed use. 5. The applicant has also addressed site plan related issues such as traffic and drainage, to the

- 12 -

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 satisfaction of this Board. Based on the above findings Glen Wilkes made a motion that was seconded by Terrence Hopper to forward a recommendation of approval and all Board comments to the referring agency for referral 128-08 The motion passed by a unanimous vote (12)

129-2008
Type: Applicant: Property Owner: Representative: Tax Map Parcel #: Brief Description:

Town of Victor Planning Board

Class: 2

Site Plan North Forest Office Providers John Erickson Bergmann Associates 15.00-1-16.110 Development of 10 single story office buildings totaling 148,500sf on 17acres (Victor Mendon Professional Park) Location: East side of State Rt 251, 1,200’ south of State Rt 96

Staff Summary: The lot has access to public water and sewer and currently accommodates a miniature golf course. The zoning is Light Industrial. The majority of the 69.25ac lot is covered in wetlands. A seasonal stream runs north and south through the site. The buildings and parking area will be placed along the north boundary of the lot and cover about 17ac. The entrance drive and parking area (835 spaces) will infringe on the 100’ boundary surrounding the NYSDEC regulated wetland. Runoff will be directed to grass swales that will outlet into larger detention areas at the east and west end of the development area. The ponds will outlet into the NYSDEC wetland. Applicant maintains that the system will mitigate peak flows and has been designed in accordance with NYSDEC standards. A portion of the seasonal stream runs through underground pipe as it passes through the existing developed area. It appears it will remain as is running through pipe between two buildings and under the parking area. The applicant estimates that the development will generate 230 trips during the morning peak hour and 223 trips during the pm peak. No further analysis of potential impacts was completed. Board Comments: 1. The Town and applicant should consider ways to more efficiently use the limited available development space and avoid infringement on the 100’ wetland buffer. One option is to build two-story structures. 2. Will variances from local requirements be needed for the infringement on the wetland buffer? 3. The Town is encouraged to require dark sky lighting and use of green building practices such as permeable pavement. It appears that the Town’s comprehensive plan calls for such measures, including LEED certification for new development 4. The Town and applicant are encouraged to explore options to enhance pedestrian connectivity including sidewalks and a connection to the adjacent walking trail.

- 13 -

Ontario County Planning Board – Draft Minutes – August 13, 2008 5. A more complete traffic study including level of service analyses is needed to fully assess potential impacts from this development. Findings 1. The development is for 148,500sf of office space on 17ac. 2. Development of this scale invariably has an intermunicipal impact on traffic flow, drainage and community character. 3. Access is from State Rt 251, 1,200’ south of State RT 96. 4. The development will generate 230 trips and 223 trips during the morning and afternoon peak hours respectively. 5. Much of the site is covered with NYSDEC wetlands 6. The development will infringe on the 100’ buffer surrounding those wetlands. 7. The applicant contends that the plan for storm water and erosion control complies with NYSDEC requirements. 8. The applicant has addressed other site plan related issues to the satisfaction of this Board Based on the above findings Mary Prince made a motion that was seconded by Clifford Kunes to forward a recommendation of approval and all Board comments to the referring agency for referral 129-08. The motion passed by a unanimous vote (12) After completion of referral reviews a motion was made and seconded and the meeting adjourned at 9:45pm

- 14 -


				
DOCUMENT INFO