Professional Development Plan
Shared by: dopdm303
Categories
Tags
professional development, professional development plan, professional development activities, professional development plans, student learning, school district, professional development committee, staff development, professional growth, needs assessment, development opportunities, staff member, the school, professional educator, mentor program
-
Stats
- views:
- 53
- posted:
- 12/3/2009
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 10
Document Sample


20092010
Muscatine Community
School District
[PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN]
Muscatine Community Schools
DISTRICT Professional Development Plan
School Year 2009-2010
Leadership Team Members: Building Principals, Director of Special Programs,
Assistant Superintendent, and Superintendent of Schools
District Data:
• The proficiency rate in reading achievement on ITBS/ITED assessments for
grades 3-11 has shown inconsistent growth the past 7 years.
• The proficiency rate in math achievement on ITBS/ITED assessments for grades
3-11 has plateaued.
• There is a significant discrepancy in the 5th grade ITBS science proficiency rates
among the eight elementary buildings.
• The proficiency rates in reading, math and science as measured by ITBS
assessments for the subgroups of low SES, Hispanic, and special education
students is lower than their peers.
• The graduation rate is 82.8%, below the state average of 88.7%.
District Goals:
A. We will increase the percentage of our students who are “proficient” in
reading comprehension on the ITBS or ITED for grades 3-11.
B. We will increase the percentage of our students who are “proficient” in
mathematics on the ITBS or ITED for grades 3-11.
C. We will increase the percentage of our students who are “proficient” in
science on the ITBS or ITED for grades 5-11.
Professional Development Targets:
Student Achievement
• Reading
We will increase the number of our students who are “proficient” in reading
comprehension on the ITBS or ITED for grades 3-5, grades 6-8, and grade 11.
3rd Grade: 84%
4th Grade: 89%
th
5 Grade: 88%
3-5 Collapsed: 87%
6th Grade 75%
th
7 Grade: 74%
8th Grade: 74%
6-8 Collapsed: 74.3%
11th Grade: 80%
(Revised 07.10.09) 2
• Mathematics
We will increase the number of our students who are “proficient” in mathematics
on the ITBS or ITED for grades 3-5, grades 6-8, and grade 11.
3rd Grade: 90%
th
4 Grade: 91%
5th Grade: 90%
3-5 Collapsed: 90.3%
6th Grade: 85%
7th Grade: 85%
th
8 Grade: 85%
6-8 Collapsed: 85%
11th Grade: 83%
• Science
We will increase the number of our students who are “proficient” in science on
the ITBS or ITED for grade 5, grades 6-8 and grade 11.
5th Grade: 89%
6th Grade: 84%
7th Grade: 84%
8th Grade: 84%
6-8 Collapsed: 84%
11th Grade: 82%
Other Areas of Focus:
Culture of Respect in All Buildings
Buildings will support and train staff for implementation of the District’s Anti-
Bullying/Harassment policy as required by Iowa code.
Increase the Graduation Rate
Strategies to improve the graduation rate at Muscatine High School will be developed
and implemented. Muscatine High School will increase the graduation rate in 2009-
2010 to 88%.
Use technology to support proficiency in reading, mathematics, and science.
Each building will use technology to support reading, math, and science instruction.
District Mandates:
Ongoing district initiatives that are mandated include:
• Essential Teaching Process, grades K-12
• Five Block Literacy Model, grades K-5 including DIBELS and Guided Reading
• 5x4 Math Model, grades K-5
• Inquiry-based Science, grades K-8
• Reading Renaissance, grades 1-5
• Transition Initiatives, grades PK-12
• Instructional Decision Making, grades K-5
(Revised 07.10.09) 3
Content for Professional Development:
District
• Iowa Core Curriculum
Rationale:
All districts will be required to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum (ICC) according to
state guidelines. The high school ICC team completed Year One of training and the
planning phase last year. They will participate in ICC Year Two training and begin the
roll-out process during the 2009-10 school year. The elementary and middle schools
will establish district teams to attend the Year One training in the Iowa Core Curriculum.
Elementary
• Instructional Decision Making
• Math - Problem-Based Instructional Tasks
• Literacy – DIBELS and Guided Reading
• Science - Inquiry-Based
• Essential Teaching
• Bullying and Harassment
Rationale:
District data indicates that between 10-15% of students are not successful in mastering
the core curriculum. To meet the needs of all students, buildings will begin the study
and implementation of the Instructional Decision Making model to support differentiated
instruction across all curricular areas.
Based on student achievement and the professional development survey data, the
district math committee recommended continued professional development supporting
problem-based instructional tasks directly linked to the district math curriculum.
After introducing numerous reading fluency strategies during the 2006-08 school years,
data indicated a need to assist teachers in using data to change instruction. All K-2
teachers were trained in the use of DIBELS and targeted instructional strategies. All
K-2 teachers will participate in a DIBELS refresher course. In addition, teachers in
grades 3-5 will be trained in the use of DIBELS and targeted instructional strategies.
Continuing initiatives will include guided reading and Reading Renaissance. Building
professional time will be used to collaborate in teams for the purpose of planning
lessons and monitoring interventions.
The district adopted an inquiry-based science curriculum. Professional development
will focus on continuing implementation of the curriculum with fidelity and scientific
journaling in all of the elementary buildings.
Essential Teaching lessons were revised. Professional development is needed to
support implementation of the revised curriculum.
All building staff will receive refresher training in bullying and harassment throughout the
school year.
(Revised 07.10.09) 4
Middle School
• Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
o Common Unit Development
o Vocabulary Instruction
o Reading in the Content Area
• Every Student Counts
• Positive Behavior Supports
• Read Alouds
• Silent Sustained Reading
Rationale:
The process of identifying a guaranteed and viable curriculum was started during the
2006-07 school year as a joint initiative in the two middle schools. This work will
continue with an emphasis on completing common units, developing common
assessments, and incorporating strategies to increase student reading skills across the
content area.
All building staff will receive refresher training in bullying and harassment throughout the
year.
In addition
• West Middle School will :
o continue the implementation of the Positive Behavior Supports Program. This
research based program clearly defines behavior expectations and provides a
structure to teach positive behavior to all students. As a result, academic
achievement also improves.
• Central Middle School will:
o continue the implementation of a Silent Sustained Reading Program for all
students. Research indicates that an additional 15 minutes of time students
spend reading significantly increases achievement in all content areas.
o implement the pyramid of intervention during home room to provide more
intense instruction in mathematics and reading to students who demonstrate
a need.
o begin the study and implementation of the Positive Behavior Supports
Program.
High School
• CORR (Collaborating On-line for Rigor and Relevance)
Rationale:
MHS was selected to participate in the Iowa High School Project. The building
leadership team will be trained in the CORR initiative and will utilize the train-the-trainer
model. All staff will be expected to complete the CORR course, develop Quadrant D
lessons, teach a Quadrant D lesson, and post on the electronic discussion board.
All building staff will receive refresher training in bullying and harassment throughout the
year.
(Revised 07.10.09) 5
Professional Development Design:
The MCSD Professional Development Plan will be aligned with the Iowa Professional
Development Plan. Teachers will work in collaborative teams during the four
professional development days, weekly early dismissals, and throughout the school
day. Training will include demonstrations in addition to theory and opportunities for
practice. Teachers will develop lessons, analyze data, and solve problems related to
implementing new strategies. Embedded into all of the professional development
content areas will be differentiated instructional strategies to prepare teachers to work
with diverse learners. The differentiated strategies will include multi-cultural and gender
fair approaches to instruction.
Four early dismissals (approximately 2 hours in length) are scheduled each month with
activities designated as follows:
• One meeting-district grade level or department
• One meeting-district special programs
• Two meetings-building school improvement
A district wide calendar will be developed in Summer 2009.
Elementary
Monday Building
Early Faculty Meetings
Dismissal Collaboration time
Monday Building
Early Collaboration time
Dismissal
Monday Building
Early Collaboration time
Dismissal District Meetings for Special Education, Counselors,
Specials, ESL & ELP
Monday Grade Level Meetings
Early Math PBIT/Investigations
Dismissal Sharing/discussing student work
Essential Teachings
Full Day Inservices
August 19 8:15-3:45 DIBELS-Grades K-5 - Half Day sessions
September 8:15-3:45 DIBELS-Grades K-5 - Half Day sessions
28 IDM/Building Collaboration Time
October 26 8:15-3:45 IDM/Building Collaboration Time
January 18 8:15-3:45 IDM/Building Collaboration Time
March 12 8:15-3:45 Data Analysis - Half Day sessions
Bullying/Harassment Training - Half Day sessions
(Revised 07.10.09) 6
Middle School
Monday Building
Early Faculty Meetings
Dismissal West-PBS & Aloud Training
Central-SSR and Pyramid of Intervention
Monday Building
Early All Faculty-Bullying/Harassment
Dismissal BLT Planning Time
Monday Building
Early Collaboration time
Dismissal District Meetings for Special Education, Counselors,
Specials, ESL & ELP
Monday Building
Early Collaboration time
Dismissal Joint Building Meeting
Guaranteed Viable Curriculum
Reading Across the Content Area
Full Day Inservices
September 28 8:00-3:30 Building Collaboration Time
October 26 8:00-3:30 Building Collaboration Time – A.M.
GVC Joint Collaboration Session – P.M.
January 18 8:00-3:30 Building Collaboration Time – A.M.
GVC Collaboration Session – P.M.
March 12 8:00-12:00 GVC Collaboration Session - Half Day sessions
1:00-3:30 Bullying/Harassment Training - Half Day sessions
(Revised 07.10.09) 7
High School
Monday Building
Early Faculty Meetings
Dismissal Department Meetings
Monday Building
Early CORR Training
Dismissal
Monday Building
Early Building Collaboration time
Dismissal District Meetings for Special Education,
Counselors, Specials, ESL & ELP
Monday Building
Early CORR Training
Dismissal
Full Day Inservices
September 28 8:00-3:30 CORR Training
October 26 8:00-3:30 CORR Training
January 18 8:00-3:30 CORR Training
March 12 8:00-12:00 CORR Training - Half Day sessions
Bullying/Harassment Training - Half Day sessions
All buildings will utilize the AEA staff as technical advisors on an as needed basis.
Participation Expectations:
All K-12 teachers will be engaged in training. The principals and central office staff will
also be actively involved.
Alignment with Iowa Teaching Standards:
The professional development initiatives must align with the following Iowa Teaching
Standards:
• Standard 2 – Demonstrates competence in content knowledge.
• Standard 3 – Demonstrates competence in planning and preparation for
instruction.
• Standard 4 – Uses strategies to deliver instruction that meets the multiple
learning needs of students.
• Standard 7 – Professional Development.
Implementation Plan:
The district Professional Development committee will meet during the 2009 summer to
develop a district calendar of professional development activities.
During the summer of 2009, building level leadership teams will meet to develop an
aligned building CSIP plan. Each building will complete the district mandated template
and submit the plan for review to the Board Office by September 15, 2009.
(Revised 07.10.09) 8
Monitoring the Implementation:
• Each building will submit a CSIP plan by September 15, 2009 that is aligned with
the district plan. In February, each building principal will verbally report on
implementation progress of the professional development plans at a district
administration meeting.
• A final report that includes professional development implementation data will be
submitted to the Board Office by June 15, 2010.
Professional Development Evaluation
• At the completion of each full-day of professional development, teachers will
complete the district PD evaluation form. This data will be compiled and shared
with the teacher leadership teams, administration and Board of Education and
will be used by the leadership team to plan the next professional development
session.
• Building principals will schedule and have teachers complete building meeting
evaluations throughout the year as designated in the building CSIP/PD Plan.
This information will be used by the building leadership team to plan the next
series of building professional development sessions.
• A summative evaluation, using the district PD summative evaluation form, will be
completed by all staff in May 2010. This will measure the impact of professional
development on student achievement and on instructional practices within the
classroom. The data will be summarized by the three grade level groupings of
elementary, middle school, and high school. The summarized results will be
shared with all staff, teacher leadership teams, administration, and the Board of
Education. This information will be used by the leadership team to plan the next
year’s professional development.
Collaborative Teams:
Administrators will participate as team members on assigned district teams and building
teams.
• District professional development team
This team will develop a district professional development plan.
• District math committee
This team will facilitate the training focused on mathematics. Members will be
the trainers in the train-the-trainer model.
• District science committee
This team will facilitate the training focused on science. Members will be the
trainers in the train-the-trainer model.
• District literacy teams
This team will facilitate the training focused on literacy. Members will facilitate
the collaborative process.
• District at-risk committee
This team will contribute and oversee components of the district plan that
address strategies to improve student transitioning between buildings.
• District Culture of Respect committee
This team will develop and implement anti-bullying/harassment training for
staff at the building level.
• Building leadership teams
This team will guide the development and implementation of the building
school improvement plan.
(Revised 07.10.09) 9
• Building cadres
Cadres will plan, develop and implement building initiatives as determined by
the SIP.
All district teams will be collaborative in nature. Expectations are that
meetings/workshops include the following:
• Stated objectives/goals
• Agenda
• Review of implementation and student data (periodically)
• Theory and demonstrations
• Lesson development and implementation
• Peer coaching and feedback
• Lesson revision
• Evaluation
Formative Data Collection and Analysis:
• Student Surveys
• Parent Surveys
• Teacher implementation logs
• Personal Reflections
• Student work samples
• Teacher lesson plans/logs
• Essential Teaching assessments
• Course units and common assessments samples
• DIBELS
Summative Data Collection and Analysis:
• Teacher implementation logs
• Student work samples
• Teacher lesson plans/logs
• Essential Teaching assessments
• Course units and common assessments
• ITBS and ITED results
• STAR Reading ( grades 3-11) and Math ( grades 3-8) results
• CBM
• DIBELS, grades K-5
• District science assessments
• District technology assessments
• District office referrals, suspensions, and expulsion rate
• District graduation rate
• District attendance rate
(Revised 07.10.09) 10
Related docs
Get documents about "