Matching Teaching Style with Learning Style
Document Sample


P r i n c i Pa l’ s B o o k s h e l f
Matching include
extraversion
types of learners are also offered.
Kise suggests educators, teachers, and
Teaching Style and introver-
sion (how an
principals need to review how they per-
sonally take in information and make
with Learning environment
energizes
decisions as learners. Coupling that with
identifying how students take in infor-
Style one); sensing
and intuition
mation and make decisions will lead
to meaningful differentiated instruc-
(processes tion. What is even more intriguing is
Differentiation Through Personality for gathering Kise’s belief that we need to challenge
Type: a framework for instruction, information); students to move beyond their comfort
assessment, and classroom thinking and feeling (how we decide zones and help them expand how they
Management. Jane A.G. Kise. Corwin what we believe); and judging and per- learn. She believes this will promote
Press, 2007, 185 pages. Available for ceiving (determining our approach to independent student learning and
purchase at www.naesp.org/nprc. school/work). Both learners and teach- achievement.
ers have preferred types. The question The utility of this book lies in its
Y ou have disaggregated your
school’s standardized test scores,
established grade-level cohorts based on
is how to match the teaching style with
learning styles within a classroom.
The author leads the reader through
practical use. Each chapter opens with a
prompt to reflect on a lesson you taught
or topic you were exposed to when you
student scores, and your teachers have various topics (classroom manage- were a student. This book would be use-
implemented differentiated interven- ment, reading, math and science, ful in a professional learning commu-
tions. The results, however, have shown writing) that lend themselves to type nity, either as an independent reading
minimal academic gains. What do you differentiation. There is also discussion activity, in grade-level team meetings, or
do now? regarding what learning looks like for as a whole-school faculty study.
Kise suggests we apply type theory, specific types of students. Each chapter
which holds that we have similar per- offers exercises for developing lessons Reviewed by James Linde, Principal,
sonality preferences for how we take based on student personality type. Sharp-Leadenhall Elementary School,
in information. Specifically, the types Strategies for working with specific Baltimore, jlinde@bcps.k12.md.us.
Ensuring Full Education
Act (IDEA).
of this classification being an accurate
one—or one that may be being used
Inclusion References
to legal codes
too frequently as compared to nation-
al standards. The “Determining the
are included Presence” section is bulleted and very
special education eligibility. Roger and eligibility comprehensive. Step 1 offers common
Pierangelo and George Giuliani. is discussed— characteristics of students suspected
Corwin Press, 2007, 118 pages. in language of having the specific disability; Step 2
Available at www.corwinpress.com. appropriate is a guide to determining procedures
to use when and assessments; and Step 3 is a final
M y first reaction to this book
was to write my name inside the
cover, and then pass it around to
discussing that
issue with par-
ents—and is followed by components
determination. The sample docu-
ments to be created by following the
outline could be used effectively dur-
my colleagues to review. I highly of evaluation. Roles of each member ing IEP meetings as a checklist to meet
recommend it as a must-have for any of an individualized education pro- the needs of the student.
school or district administrator who gram (IEP) committee are also clearly I definitely suggest making copies
deals with special education delineated. of this book available to teachers who
questions. Following this introduction, each attend IEP meetings and using it as
This slim volume is more a refer- classification for special education a guide for discussing eligibility and
ence guide than a book you pick up is discussed in a formatted chapter: placement with parents.
and read, though it is certainly not an “Definition Under IDEA,” “Overview,”
unpleasant experience to read it cover “Prevalence,” and “Determining the Reviewed by Jeanette Gilliland, Interim
to cover. The opening chapter clearly Presence” (of the classification). The Director of Personnel, School District of
defines and provides a brief history prevalence section, while brief, will the Chathams, Chatham, New Jersey,
of the Individuals with Disabilities help readers relate to the possibilities jeanettegilliland@yahoo.com.
62 Principal n May/June 2008 www.naesp.org
Related docs
Get documents about "