APPENDIX-B-–-BROMLEY-UDP-POLICIES-RECOMMENDED-FOR-NOT-SAVING-

Document Sample
APPENDIX-B-–-BROMLEY-UDP-POLICIES-RECOMMENDED-FOR-NOT-SAVING- Powered By Docstoc
					NE10 Hedgerow Retention
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

BE6 Yes Yes Environmental Improvements
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy

Yes Yes Conforms with 4B.3 Conforms to 3D.16 Mayor’s Biodiversit y Strategy 2002 Part III section F. Circular 06/2005 Para’s 9294, PPS9 para’s 1112. Hedgerow Retention Regulation 1997 Consistent with PPS1 para 27

Conformity to The London Plan?

Consistent with current National Policy?

Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)? Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged?

No – covered Yes by policies BE4 and BE5.

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

No repeats N/A national policy and is covered by the Hedgerow Retention Regulation 1997 and policy BE7.

1

N/A

N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A No, see Bromley
LDS

Policies support the delivery of housing?

N/A Yes N/A N/A No see Bromley LDS

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

NE13 Green Corridors
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

EMP9 Vacant Commercial Sites and Premises Yes Yes Conforms with 3B.4 Consistent with PPS1 para 23 PPG4 Conformity PPS9 para with 3D.14 12 Mayors Biodiversit y Strategy Yes Yes
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)? Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged?

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

No – an Yes aspirational policy covered by national and regional policies.

No- local Yes importance for biodiversity but policy repeats PPS9 para 12. Links to Bromley Biodiversity Action Plan.

2

N/A N/A Yes N/A LDS N/A No, see Bromley LDS

N/A Yes N/A

Policies support the delivery of housing?

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration?

N/A N/A No, see Bromley

Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

EMP10 Advice for Businesses
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

S14 Pedestrian Environment Yes Yes Conforms to 3C.21 4B.1 4B.3 4B.5 4B.6 4B.8 4B.10 Consistent with PPS6 para 1.5, 2.19, PPS1. Conforms with 3B.4 Consistent with PPS1 para 23 PPG 4 Yes Yes
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)? Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged?

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

No the policy Yes is not required as it is covered by London Plan Policies.

No – an Yes aspirational policy covered by national and regional policies.

3

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No, see Bromley LDS

N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A No, see Bromley LDS

Policies support the delivery of housing?

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

C3 Access to Buildings for People with Disabilities
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

ER1 Waste Management Yes Yes Conforms to Mayors Waste Strategy Consistent with DEFRA Waste Strategy 2007 and PPS 10 Conforms to Chapter 3 Objectives 2 & 4 and Policy 3A.17 Consistent with PPS1 paras 5, 1416 and 21 DDA Act 2005.PPG1 3 Yes Yes
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)? Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged?

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

No– policy Yes does not go further than regional and national policy from which the waste hierarchy is taken.

No – repeats Yes national policy and covered by the Act/

4

N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A No –see Bromley LDS

Yes N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A

Policies support the delivery of housing?

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

ER3 Promoting Recycling
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

ER4 Sustainable and Energy Efficient Development Yes Yes Conforms to Mayors Waste Strategy Generally Conforms to London Plan 4A.7, Generally consistent with PPS1 p-Climate Change, and PPS22 No effectively superseded by National and Regional Policies. Consistent with DEFRA Waste Strategy 2007 and PPS 10 No repeats National and Regional Standards. Yes Yes
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)?

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

5
Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes No, see Bromley LDS Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes No See Bromley LDS

Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged? Policies support the delivery of housing?

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

ER5 Air Quality
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

ER6 PotentiallyPolluting Development Yes Yes Conforms to London Plan with Alterations policy 4A.19 Consistent with National Air Strategy No repeats national and regional policy. Conforms to London Plan consolidat ed with Alterations 2008 Policy 4A.19 Consistent with DEFRA UK Air Strategy 2007, PPS23 No repeats National and Regional policy Yes Yes
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)?

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

6
Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No, see Bromley LDS Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No, see Bromley LDS

Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged? Policies support the delivery of housing?

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

ER8 Noise Pollution
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title)

ER12 Controlling Development in Flood Risk Areas Yes Yes Conforms with 4A 12-13 Conforms to 4A.20, Mayors Ambient Noise Strategy Yes Yes
Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)? Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged?

ER13 Yes Yes Conforms with 4A.14 Foul and Surface Water Discharges from Development

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

Consistent No -repeats in Yes with PPS25 part but is inadequate, PPS25 is stronger.

Consistent No repeats Yes with PPS25 national and regional policy

Consistent No- repeats Yes with PPS24 national and regional policy

7

N/A

Yes

N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A No, see Bromley
LDS LDS

Policies support the delivery of housing?

N/A

N/A Yes N/A N/A No, see Bromley

Policies on Green Belt?

N/A N/A N/A No, see Bromley LDS

Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

ER14 Surface and Groundwater Quality
Bexley UDP Policy (number and title) Clear central strategy, where appropriate Has regard to Community Strategy

ER15 Conservation of Water Resources Yes Yes Conforms with 4A.16 Consistent No -repeats with PPS25 and is not as developed as national and regional policy. Yes Yes Conforms with 4A.17
Conformity to The London Plan? Consistent with current National Policy? Is this Policy necessary (i.e. does not merely repeat national/ regional policy; policy response required by higher level policy)?

Consistent No -repeats Yes with PPS25 and is not as clear as national and regional policy

APPENDIX B Part 1 – BROMLEY UDP POLICIES RECOMMENDED FOR NOT ‘SAVING’ (EXPIRING) AFTER JULY 2009

8
Yes

Effective policy for areas where significant change in the use or development of land is envisaged?

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No, see Bromley
LDS LDS

N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A No, see Bromley

Policies support the delivery of housing?

Policies on Green Belt? Policies support economic development and regeneration? Policies for waste management? Policies promote renewable energy; reduce impact on climate change and safeguard water resources?

Not feasible/ desirable to replace policy by July 2009

Additional comments and/ or justification

DRAFT APPENDIX B part 2 :- Chapter 16 Schedule of Proposal Sites – sites for deletion No HOUSING 1 Worsley Bridge Road BROMLEY TOWN CENTRE 10 Police Station/shop
units/First Church of Christ Scientist, Widmore Road To provide additional housing. Proposal Location Proposals and Supporting Justification/Comments Saved Reason

No

Implemented

To achieve the appropriate mix of residential and commercial re-use of the listed church and locally listed police station buildings.

No

Implemented

ORPINGTO N TOWN CENTRE 15 Station Road Car Park

To enhance the vitality of the southern end of the Town Centre, with the provision of retail/leisure facilities and car parking.

No

Implemented

9


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Tags: APPEN, DIX-B
Stats:
views:9
posted:11/29/2009
language:English
pages:9
Description: APPENDIX-B-–-BROMLEY-UDP-POLICIES-RECOMMENDED-FOR-NOT-SAVING-