9
** OO'~ ~**
"
."".-'.' ,':..
.
".",1'
/ A-""
,'-,.T,-:-
I
,,,
...
.".-'.'.':'.,"'r":,.,
1 2
3 4
oS
Cindy A. Cohn,~.
Gwen A. Hinze,
(State Bel No. 145997) Esq. (State B.: No. 209562)
ELECfRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 ShotWellStreet SanFrancisco,CA 94110 Tel~hone: (415) 436-9.3.33 xlO8 FacsImile: (415) 436-9993
David Groene (State Bar No. 160107) FIRST AMENDMBNT PROJBCT 1736 Franklin St, Ninth Floor Oakland, CA 94612
~' .. IJF 'FIf:-r.
PM It: ..
~i_,
£ .
..I"""'h~ ~ I'n l) ., ..' '. ".;-"r,'="-:"
':1/':-:" " .., "'"I'I"
1; ! "1 'J-.' ." L,\1",.
;.r
Tnr
Clr.
C ,.
'_::'~;.;!.:.
..~~ ~"D; t"7
\,.;
.
"'" ~':',:: '\' ",l: ~. v;-',.
",.,:.:~.,.,-!:j:;~i~!I:::"!::,' '0' - ".,. ..,." ~ ,", 0 "'.I~~ . I I . V , ,.w".' "
,. '"'
~~C
.' i,;-';'
"'
,
6 7
8
.. ~.
~"t
:..,~.;,
Telephone:(510) 208-7744 Facsimile: (510) 208-4562
9 10
Attorneys Defendant for 10HN DOE
SUPERIORCOURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR.mE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA UNLIMrrBD nJRISDICTION E. VAN CULLENS,
No. CV 81466-4
11
12 13
14 IS
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE.
DECLARATION OF CINDY .A.c~~ ~PORT OF MOTION TO .Q~~H :s"Ui:POENA AND SPECIAL MOTION
16 17
18 19 20
10 STRIKE
DefendanL
D.ate: April 17.2003 Time: 9:00 a.m. Depl: 2. HOD. WilliamJ. ElfviDg
21
22
23
1, Cindy A. Cohn.herebydeclare: I am an attomey at lawt licensedto practicebefore this Court and attomey of record
1.
for n'1OVant John Doe herein. The facts stated herein are known to me of my own personal knowledge and if called upon to testify thereto,I could Bndwould competentlydo so.
24 2S
26
2.
Attached heretoasExhibit "All is a trUeandCOlTect 0(& Van.Cu11~ v. John copy
~,
No.2003LOOO (18thJudicialCircuit.D\1Page 111 COunty, minois).
3.
4.
-
Attachedheretoas Exhibit "B" is a tnlc and correctcopy of the deposition subpoena
27
from E. Van CUllensto John Doe datedFebroary 10)2003. Attached hereto as Exhibit t'C" are 1J'I1e and COJTect copies of m re Westell
l ~_..nYY DECt: OFCO~ IN SUPPORT :M;0'11~ 1Q-~~H OF
SUBPOENA AND SPECIAL MOTION TO STR:Ix.E
I
~~ ~. qM. ~.u..
.2 28
- OO"d
p~.35
£6669£VSivi o.L ~~
~lS 31I~~ ~ l.S:9't' £OOZ lot ~W
Technolo~es. Inc.. Securities Lit No. OOC6735 (N.D. Dl.) and Dollens v. Vukovich and Zionts. No.
2
3 4 5
OlC2826 (N.D. m. 5 ~, Attachedheretoas Exhibit "D" is a true and correct copy of Immunomedics.Inc. v.
775 A2d 773 (N.J. Sup.Ct. App. Div. 2001).
6.
Attachedheretoas Exhibit "E" is a true and correct copy of Dendrite International.
6
'1
Inc. v. Doe. No.3, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J. App. 2001).
7.
Attachedheretoas Exhibit "F" is a true and correct copy of Missouri ex reI. Classic
8
9
III Inc. v. Ely, 954 S.W.2d650, 659 (Mo. App. 1997).
8.
Attachedheretoas Exhibit "G" is a true and con"ectcopy of In re Discovm Order
10
IssuedBy the Sunerior Court. Provinceof Quebec.District of Montreal. Canadadated March 8, 2003,Northern District ofCalifomia CaseNo. 02-O151-MISC-WHA.
12
13 14
9.
10.
Attachedhereto as Exhibit "H" is a true and correct copy of Statev. DiGuid~ 152
m.2d 104, 122(1992). Attachedheretoas Exhibit "I" is a true and con-ect copy ofBrvson v. News America
IS
16
17
Publications,174m.2d 77,87 (1996). 1 Attachedheretoas Exhibit" J" is a troe and correct copy of Schivarelli v. CBS. Inc.,
333 Dl.App.3d755, 765 (2002). 12. Attachedheretoas Exm"bit"K" is a true and correctcopy of Aroonsakul v. Shannon,
18 19
279 Dl.App.3d345, 350 (1996). 13 AttachedheretoasExhibit "L" is a true andcorrectcopy of Schafferv. Zekman. 196
20
21 22 23
24
lli.App.3d 727, 732 (1990). 14. Attachedheretoas Exhibit "M" is a true and correctcopy of Archibald v. Belleville
News Democrat,54 Dl.App.2d38, 42 (1964). 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit "N" is a true and correct copy of Chapski v. Coi!lev
25
~
92 DI.2d344, 352 (1982). 16. AttachedheretoasExht"bit"0" is a true and correctcopy of Homerin v. Mid- Dlinois
26 27
Newsna!>efS. 245 1ll.App.3d 402, 405 (1993).
28
17.
Attached hereto as Exhibit "P" is a true and correct copy of Mittleman v. Witous, 2 OF DECLOFCOHNIN SUPPORT MOTIONTO QUASH
SUBPOENAAND SPECIAL MonON TO STRIKE
r
:
1
2 3 4 5
135 1ll.2d 220, 231 (1989).
18.
Attachedhereto as Exhibit "Q" is a true and correct copy of Grisanzio v. Rockford
NewsDaDers. Dl.App.3d914,919 (1985). 132 19.
.K!:§f:f,
Attached hereto as Exhibit "R ff is a true and correct copy of BmY Harlem Com. v.
273 1ll.App.3d388,390-91 (1995). 20. Attachedheretoas Exhibit "8" is a true and COlTect copy of Cartwrii!ht v. Garrison.
6
7
113 D1.App.3d 536 (1983).
8
21.
Attachedheretoas Exhibit "T" is a true and correct copy of Catalanov. Pechous. 83
9 10 11
12
lli.3d 146 (1980). 22. Attachedheretoas Exhibit "V" is a true and correctcopy of T~~er y. Conley Press,
308 lli.App.3d 718 (1999). 23.
Attachedheretoas Exhibit "V" is a true and correctcopy of Newell v. Field
13
14 15 16
EntCf!>rises, Dl.3d 735 (1980). 91
24.
Attached hereto as Exhibit "W" is a true and correct copy of Moriartv v. Greene,
315 lli.App.3d 225, 234 (2000). 25. Attached hereto as Exhibit "X" is a true and correct copy of Hol1ewellv. Vitullo.
17. 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
299 lli.App.3d 513,518-19 (1998). 26. Attached hereto as Exhibit "Y" is a true and correct copy of Dubinsky y. United
Arlines MasterExecutiveCouncil. 303 lli.App.3d 317, 329-30(1999). 27. Attachedheretoas Exhibit "ZIt is a true and correctcopy of Gordonv. Marrone, 590
N.Y.S.2d 649, 656 (N.Y.Sup. Ct. 1992), I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED: March 17, 2003
B~#~:::Q
DECL OF COHN IN SUPPORTOF MonON TO QUASH SUBPOENAAND SPECIAL MonON TO STRIKE
=-
28
3