Arvind K Agarwal Plea Agreement

Document Sample
Arvind K Agarwal Plea Agreement Powered By Docstoc
					IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARVIND K. AGARWAL * * * * * ******** Criminal No. RWT-04-125 Filed 03/08/2004 Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1343

2009-11-27

PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (“the United States”), and Arvind K. Agarwal (“the defendant”) hereby enter into the following Plea Agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R. Crim. P.”): RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT 1. The defendant understands his rights: (a) to be represented by an attorney; (b) to be charged by indictment; (c) to plead not guilty of any criminal charge brought against him; (d) to have a trial by jury, at which he would be presumed not guilty of the charge and the United States would have to prove every essential element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt for him to be found guilty; (e) to confront and cross-examine witnesses against him and to subpoena witnesses in his defense at trial; (f) not to be compelled to incriminate himself; (g) to appeal his conviction, if he is found guilty at trial; and (h) to appeal the imposition of sentence against him, including the rights

provided under 18 U.S.C. § 3742.
SOURCED: WWW.BACKGROUNDNOW.COM Page 1 of 13 www.BackgroundNow.com provides background checks to businesses; publishes fraud, corruption, and other criminal and civil case news; and distr butes case complaints, indictments, plea agreements and other court documents to analysts, bloggers, journalists, reporters and interested readers. Always keep in mind that indictments, complaints or informations are not evidence of guilt. These are descriptions of accusations made against defendants. Those accused are presumed innocent until guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is proven or until guilt is admitted or plead.

AGREEMENT TO PLEAD GUILTY AND WAIVER OF CERTAIN RIGHTS 2.

2009-11-27

The defendant waives the rights set out in subparagraphs (c) through (g) of

Paragraph 1 above. The defendant also waives the right to appeal the imposition of sentence against him set out in Paragraph 1(h), so long as the sentence imposed is within the applicable range set forth in the U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL (USSG). Furthermore, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b), the defendant will waive the right to be charged by indictment set out in Paragraph 1(b) and will plead guilty at arraignment to a one-count information to be filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, charging him with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. 3. The defendant, pursuant to the terms of this Plea Agreement, will plead

guilty to the criminal charge described in Paragraph 2 above, and will make a factual admission of guilt before the Court in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(3), as set forth in Paragraph 4 below. FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE OFFENSE CHARGED 4. Had this case gone to trial, the United States would have presented

evidence to prove the following facts: (a) The defendant is the owner and president of NB Systems Corporation (“NB Systems”) and Strobe Business Solutions Corporation (“Strobe”), both of which are computer consultation companies located and incorporated in the State of Maryland. From in or about October 1999 through in or about November 2001, the defendant, through both NB Systems and Strobe, performed computer consultation services for the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

SOURCED: WWW.BACKGROUNDNOW.COM Page 2 of 13 www.BackgroundNow.com provides background checks to businesses; publishes fraud, corruption, and other criminal and civil case news; and distr butes case complaints, indictments, plea agreements and other court documents to analysts, bloggers, journalists, reporters and interested readers. Always keep in mind that indictments, complaints or informations are not evidence of guilt. These are descriptions of accusations made against defendants. Those accused are presumed innocent until guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is proven or until guilt is admitted or plead.

-2-

(“WSSC”), a quasi-governmental utility located in Laurel, Maryland, that provides water and sewer services to residents of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. More specifical
				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Tags:
Stats:
views:83
posted:11/27/2009
language:English
pages:13
BUY THIS DOCUMENT NOW PRICE: $10 100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEED
PARTNER BackgroundNow.com Staff
Founded by Lee Hill and launched August 1st, 2003, BackgroundNow.com provides background checks to businesses; publishes fraud, corruption, and other criminal and civil case news; and distributes case complaints, indictments, plea agreements and other court documents to analysts, bloggers, journalists, reporters and interested readers.