Learning Center
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

Israel's 'right to self-defense' - a tremendous propaganda victory


									Israel's 'right to self-defense' - a
tremendous propaganda victory
By supporting Israel's offensive on Gaza,
Western leaders have given the Israelis
carte blanche to do what they're best at:
Wallow in their sense of victimhood and
ignore Palestinian suffering.
By Amira Hass | Nov.19, 2012 | 4:06 AM |       34

One of Israel's tremendous propaganda victories is that it has been accepted as a victim
of the Palestinians, both in the view of the Israeli public and that of Western leaders who
hasten to speak of Israel's right to defend itself. The propaganda is so effective that only
the Palestinian rockets at the south of Israel, and now at Tel Aviv, are counted in the
round of hostilities. The rockets, or damage to the holiest of holies - a military jeep - are
always seen as a starting point, and together with the terrifying siren, as if taken from a
World War II movie, build the meta-narrative of the victim entitled to defend itself.

Every day, indeed every moment, this meta-narrative allows Israel to add another link to
the chain of dispossession of a nation as old as the state itself, while at the same time
managing to hide the fact that one continuous thread runs from the 1948 refusal to allow
Palestinian refugees to return to their homes, the early 1950s expulsion of Bedouin from
the Negev desert, the current expulsion of Bedouin from the Jordan Valley, ranches for
Jews in the Negev, discrimination in budgets in Israel, and shooting at Gazan fishermen
to keep them from earning a respectable living. Millions of such continuous threads link
1948 to the present. They are the fabric of life for the Palestinian nation, as divided as it
may be in isolated pockets. They are the fabric of life of Palestinian citizens of Israel and
of those who live in their lands of exile.

But these threads are not the entire fabric of life. The resistance to the threads that we,
the Israelis, endlessly spin is also part of the fabric of life for Palestinians. The word
resistance has been debased to mean the very masculine competition of whose missile
will explode furthest away (a competition among Palestinian organizations, and between
them and the established Israeli army ). It does not invalidate the fact that, in essence,
resistance to the injustice inherent in Israeli domination is an inseparable part of life for
each and every Palestinian.

The foreign and international development ministries in the West and in the United
States knowingly collaborate with the mendacious representation of Israel as victim, if
only because every week they receive reports from their representatives in the West
Bank and Gaza Strip about yet another link of dispossession and oppression that Israel
has added to the chain, or because their own taxpayers' money make up for some of the
humanitarian disasters, large and small, inflicted by Israel.
On November 8, two days before the attack on the holiest of holies - soldiers in a military
jeep - they could have read about IDF soldiers killing 13-year old Ahmad Abu Daqqa,
who was playing soccer with his friends in the village of Abassan, east of Khan Yunis. The
soldiers were 1.5 kilometers from the kids, inside the Gaza Strip area, busy with
"exposing" (a whitewashed word for destroying ) agricultural land. So why shouldn't the
count of aggression start with a child? On November 10, after the attack on the jeep, the
IDF killed another four civilians, aged 16 to 19.

Wallowing in ignorance

Leaders of the West could have known that, before the IDF's exercise last week in the
Jordan Valley, dozens of Bedouin families were told to evacuate their homes. How
extraordinary that IDF training always occurs where Bedouin live, not Israeli settlers, and
that it constitutes a reason to expel them. Another reason. Another expulsion. The
leaders of the West could also have known, based on the full-color, chrome-paper reports
their countries finance, that since the beginning of 2012, Israel has destroyed 569
Palestinian buildings and structures, including wells and 178 residences. In all, 1,014
people were affected by those demolitions.

We haven't heard masses of Tel Aviv and southern residents warning the stewards of the
state about the ramifications of this destruction on the civilian population. The Israelis
cheerfully wallow in their ignorance. This information and other similar facts are available
and accessible to anyone who's really interested. But Israelis choose not to know. This
willed ignorance is a foundation stone in the building of Israel's sense of victimization.
But ignorance is ignorance: The fact that Israelis don't want to know what they are doing
as an occupying power doesn't negate their deeds or Palestinian resistance.

In 1993, the Palestinians gave Israel a gift, a golden opportunity to cut the threads tying
1948 to the present, to abandon the country's characteristics of colonial dispossession,
and together plan a different future for the two peoples in the region. The Palestinian
generation that accepted the Oslo Accords (full of traps laid by smart Israeli lawyers ) is
the generation that got to know a multifaceted, even normal, Israeli society because the
1967 occupation allowed it (for the purpose of supplying cheap labor ) almost full
freedom of movement. The Palestinians agreed to a settlement based on their minimum
demands. One of the pillars of these minimum demands was treating the Gaza Strip and
West Bank as a single territorial entity.

But once the implementation of Oslo started, Israel systematically did everything it could
to make the Gaza Strip into a separate, disconnected entity, as part of Israel's insistence
on maintaining the threads of 1948 and extending them. Since the rise of Hamas, it has
done everything to back up the impression Hamas prefers - that the Gaza Strip is a
separate political entity where there is no occupation. If that is so, why not look at things
as follows: As a separate political entity, any incursion into Gazan territory is an
infringement of its sovereignty, and Israel does this all the time. Does the government of
the state of Gaza not have the right to respond, to deter, or at least the masculine right -
a twin of the IDF's masculine right - to scare the Israelis just as Israel scares the

But Gaza is not a state. Gaza is under Israeli occupation, despite all the verbal acrobatics
of both Hamas and Israel. The Palestinians who live there are part of a people whose
DNA contains resistance to oppression.

In the West Bank, Palestinian activists try to develop a type of resistance different from
the masculine, armed resistance. But the IDF puts down all popular resistance with zeal
and resolve. We haven't heard of residents of Tel Aviv and the south complaining about
the balance of deterrence the IDF is building against the civilian Palestinian population.
And so Israel again provides reasons for more young Palestinians, for whom Israel is an
abnormal society of army and settlers, to conclude that the only rational resistance is
spilled blood and counter-terrorizing. And so every Israeli link of oppression and all
Israeli disregard of the oppression's existence drags us further down the slope of
masculine competition.

To top