Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

Taitz-v-Colvin-Order-by-Judge-Hollander-03.13.2014.pdf

VIEWS: 2,701 PAGES: 34

									                 Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 1



                                    United States District Court
                                       District Of Maryland
     Chambers of                                                                        101 West Lombard Street
Ellen Lipton Hollander                                                                  Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  District Court Judge                                                                        410-962-0742

                                                March 13, 2014

       MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL AND DR. TAITZ

              Re:        Orly Taitz v. Carolyn Colvin
                         Civil Action No. ELH-13-01878

       Dear Counsel and Dr. Taitz:

               On March 12, 2014, Dr. Taitz sent to the Clerk of the Court a “Reply in Support of a
       Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff.” The Clerk did not docket the filing,
       instead notifiying Dr. Taitz, with court approval, that “a motion for leave to file a sur-reply must
       be filed.” See Return Pleading Order, ECF 33. On March 13, Dr. Taitz contacted my chambers
       via telephone, advising one of my law clerks that her filing was not a sur-reply to the defendant’s
       pending motion, but rather was a reply in support of Dr. Taitz’s own motion for summary
       judgment (ECF 31). Upon review of the docket, it appears that the Return Pleading Order was
       sent in error. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to docket the “Reply in Support of a Motion for
       Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff,” which is attached to this Memorandum, as a Reply in
       support of ECF 31.

               Additionally, on March 13, 2014, I received a letter from Dr. Taitz advising the Court
       that she was unable to access, via the Court’s electronic case filing system (“ECF”), defendant’s
       August 14, 2013 “Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment” (ECF 7).
       Dr. Taitz’s letter is attached to this Memorandum. Accordingly, the Court’s Case Administration
       Manager was notified of plaintiff’s difficulty in accessing the document. The Case
       Administration Manager has since advised my office that the issue has been resolved.

               Despite the informal nature of this Memorandum, it is an Order of the Court, and the
       Clerk is directed to docket it as such.


                                                         Very truly yours,

                                                             /s/
                                                         Ellen Lipton Hollander
                                                         United States District Judge
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 34-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 14 of 14
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-1 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-3 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-3 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-4 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-4 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-4 Filed 03/14/14 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-4 Filed 03/14/14 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-4 Filed 03/14/14 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-5 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-5 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-5 Filed 03/14/14 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-5 Filed 03/14/14 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-6 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-6 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 35-6 Filed 03/14/14 Page 3 of 3

								
To top