Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize_ - The Answer to The Bu

Document Sample
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize_ - The Answer to The Bu Powered By Docstoc
					Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour




                                                                    by Zahir Ebrahim
                                                                      October 11, 2009
                                                             postscript Added December 11 2009
                                                            from ProjectHumanbeingsfirst Website




        How to win the Nobel Peace Prize
        In complete realization of the 'change' mantra:

                                                        “We are gonna spread happiness,
                                                        we are gonna spread freeeeedom,
                                                           Obama's gonna change it,
                                                         Obama's gonna leeeeead em,
                                                             we're gonna change it,
                                                               and re-arrange it,
                                                        we are gonna change the world!”
                                                                 (The Obama Kids Song)


        President Barack Obama has just been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The President is delighted and “Says He’s
        ‘Surprised’ and ‘Humbled’” according to the New York Times.

        When I first penned “How to Win the Nobel Peace Prize” in great anguish in April 2003, in Chapter 2 of Prisoners of the
        Cave as the “shock and awe” of Iraq was under way, I hadn't the full prescience of all the future players at the time for I
        grossly omitted the new name.

        My apologies to the harbingers of 'change'.

        Their mantra, and the $2 billion spent creating it, has obviously been very effective. After the “peace maker” moniker,
        anointment as the “Messiah” really can't be that far behind. This Machiavellian fabrication of a 'savior' was already
        examined in Mr. Obama - The Post Modern Coup in November 2008.

        It is astonishing to me how simplistic the most lauded dissent-chiefs and most profound intellectuals are in the West.
        Even when they critique absurdities and war-mongering as per their good conscience, they tread remarkably gently.

        Look at historian Howard Zinn's comment in the UK Guardian.

        He is once again simplistic in his vocal dissent piece - just as he has been all along on 911 - by deliberately not seeing
        the Orwellian propaganda agenda behind the Peace Prize:

                “I was dismayed when I heard Barack Obama was given the Nobel peace prize. A shock, really, to think



http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour

                that a president carrying on two wars would be given a peace prize. Until I recalled that Woodrow Wilson,
                Theodore Roosevelt, and Henry Kissinger had all received Nobel peace prizes. The Nobel committee is
                famous for its superficial estimates, won over by rhetoric and by empty gestures, and ignoring blatant
                violations of world peace.”

        No, No, NO! Never 'superficial estimates' and never 'empty gestures'.

        Rather, laying the seeds of masterful propaganda towards Orwellian social engineering.

        Thus, Professor Zinn's concluding prescription:

                “The Nobel peace committee should retire, and turn over its huge funds to some international peace
                organization which is not awed by stardom and rhetoric, and which has some understanding of history”,
                which, since he diagnosed the disease incorrectly, is a cure, I am sure, to the problem that he has posited in
                his own mind, but one that has no forensic bearing to the modernity plaguing mankind. Indeed, this
                “modernity” is itself “as old as mankind”.

        So while Howard Zinn does conscionably lament the bizarre awarding of peace prizes to murderous trigger pullers, he
        very carefully does not mention the prime-movers whom they work for:

                “Oh yes, the committee saw fit to give a peace prize to Henry Kissinger, because he signed the final peace
                agreement ending the war in Vietnam, of which he had been one of the architects.

                Kissinger, who obsequiously went along with Nixon's expansion of the war, with the bombing of peasant
                villages in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Kissinger, who matches the definition of a war criminal very
                accurately, is given a peace prize!”

        Ever since hectoring hegemons have existed, ever since oligarchs have existed wielding power from behind the scenes
        through their 'errand boys', ever since they discovered social engineering, and especially ever since Edward Bernays
        discovered and employed Public Relations which coincided approximately with the time that Nobel peace prizes started to
        be awarded, these accolades from the high and mighty serve the oligarchic agendas as needed.

        Since Professor Howard Zinn, as a profound historian who would like us to learn from history, is berating the Nobel Peace
        Committee on their lacking “some understanding of history”, watch the BBC documentary Century of Self to observe how
        Edward Bernays himself fabricated President Woodrow Wilson's aura as the European 'savior' right after the “he kept us
        out of the war” devil had taken America to World War I at the behest of his handlers Bernard Baruch and Col. Edward
        Mandell House, both of whom represented the international bankers.

        House even penned the rationale for having 'errand boys' and controlling them in a fictional narrative based upon his own
        role during Woodrow Wilson's presidency.

        Who is channeling President Obama's energies such that despite all his election promises to the contrary, he is very
        predictably maintaining the same overarching policy axioms as his predecessor from his day one in office?

        These prizes are anything but “empty gestures”. It is both a payoff to tickle the ego of the 'errand boy', and a propaganda
        seed. In the expert hands of the Mighty Wurlitzer, such a gift can convince the masses of the most ridiculous absurdities,
        like the War on Terror already has.

        The proof of these statements of fact is both empirical, and historical.

        Watch Barack Obama crafted into a fine new global 'savior' at the expense of the 'untermenschen'. That's why the United
        States President, ceremoniously presiding over the most militarized superpower in the world which has just devastated
        two civilizations to smithereens, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize while he rapidly accelerates his war prosecution to
        bring “peace” in a one-world government.

        Here is the excerpt from Chapter 2 of Prisoners of the Cave.




http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour

        How to win the Nobel Peace Prize
        President Jimmy Carter, known as the conscionable president, refused to bomb Tehran despite recommendations from
        his wife and advisors, as noted by a speaker recently, builds homes for Habitat for Humanity with his own bare hands,
        and is the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize.

        His own National Security Advisor (ZB - Zbigniew Brzezinski) took credit for handing the Soviets their Vietnam in
        Afghanistan, leading to the destruction of an entire civilization and loss of multiple of its generations to multiple civil wars
        and poverty, eventually leading to 911 - if one is to believe the facile version of 911 put forth by the American
        Government.

        Whether or not Bin Laden was involved in 911, the facts of history attest to the machinations of the United States of
        America in the exercise of its military and economic power since the end of World War II as forcefully articulated by
        George Kennan in 1948:

                “...We should cease to talk about vague and - for the Far East - unreal objectives such as human rights, the
                raising of living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in
                straight power concepts.” *8

        ZB's own confessions to this end are highly instructive. The 1998 ZB interview to "Le Nouvel Observateur", translated
        from the original French by author and historian Bill Blum, is reproduced below.

        The translator notes that:

                “*There are at least two editions of this magazine; with the perhaps sole exception of the Library of
                Congress, the version sent to the United States is shorter than the French version, and the Brzezinski
                interview was not included in the shorter version.”

                Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that
                American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet
                intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a
                role in this affair. Is that correct?

                Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980,
                that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until
                now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for
                secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the
                president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military
                intervention.

                Question: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired
                this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

                Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the
                probability that they would.

                Question: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a
                secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a
                basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?

                Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the
                Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the
                border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.
                Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that
                brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

                Question: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and
                advice to future terrorists?




http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour

                Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet
                empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

                Question: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents
                a world menace today.

                Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There
                isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the
                leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian
                fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism?
                Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries. *9

        Frighteningly amoral execution of George Kennan's policy articulation from 1948 of “going to have to deal in straight
        power concepts”. Wouldn't you say that all American Presidents have been doing exactly that?

        I had also personally witnessed on television, President Carter in 1978 toasting to the health of the King of Persia, Raza
        Shah, with approximately the following words:

                “To your majesty, to the love that your people have for you.”

        This to a tyrant responsible for brutally suppressing his own people with American supplied weapons, and while Carter is
        toasting his host inside the Palace, outside the streets are filled with people protesting their king.

        When the revolution proceeds a few month later, instead of a mea culpa, a reign of vilification, long war, and sanctions is
        imposed on the people of Iran. And for what crime? For wanting their freedom from American-CIA imposed tyranny at the
        hands of one of their own elite?

        The Iran Hostage Crisis, covered on ABC Nightline daily, which I would occasionally catch while eating dinner in the late
        night cafeteria at MIT, as I recall was quite devoid of any significant history or accurate analysis of the past 26 years
        leading up to the crisis.

        I subsequently saw a shredded memo painstakingly put together and freely available in the streets of most countries in
        the region about some of the imperial work being done by the American staff in the US embassy in Teheran, whom the
        hostage takers were calling CIA spies.

        The taking of these hostages, many of them civilians, was probably the biggest blunder the Iranians made after their
        revolution, and were paid for in spades by America with the war imposed on them through Iraq.

        If Jimmy Carter had deserved any Peace Prize, it would have been to avert the crisis with Tehran and successfully bring
        back the hostages, made amends with Iran for its people finally exercising their will and set the stage for friendship
        between the two countries, leaving a legacy of peace and prosperity for the region and appreciated the world over.

        He did not do that.




        What is the prize for?
        You might say Camp David and Egypt-Israel peace accord over a desert that was militarily occupied in a war?

        When his own people call Anwar Sadat a traitor for making his private and separate peace with Israel and breaking up
        the Arab stance on Palestine which is what Israel wanted all along; and he is also a despised dictator of his own people
        hated and killed by them for his oppressive policies only to be replaced by another brutish dictator who is also continually
        kept in power by being the second largest US aid recipient in the world after Israel - is that a peace at the barrel of a gun
        or an enduring peace with justice?

        Brokering a “peace accord” that was only a new manifestation of an old “divide and conquer” plan that the peoples at
        least on one side of it did not want, and which only allowed Israel a freer hand to continue suppressing the Palestinians
        and incrementally continue to swallow up their lands without interference from its Arab neighbors, instead of one in which


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour

        all could have lived in justice and peace with full rights of return for those displaced, is an imperial farce forced upon a
        beleaguered peoples.

        And the impact of precisely this “peace accord” for which Carter got the “peace” prize are visible to all and sundry in
        Palestine - an amazing case study in faits accomplis that become “irreversible” - a modern day genocidal resettlement of
        another's land right before the very eyes of the silently bespectating world!

        What about Menachem Begin? He certainly also had all the qualifications for the Nobel Peace Prize, having blown up
        the King David Hotel in 1948 as part of the terrorist Stern-Irgun gangs and was once the most wanted criminal in
        Britain. *9A

        Let's see who might be in line next? Ariel Sharon and George Bush Jr. and Sr., as well as Bin Laden and Zbigniew
        Brzezinski, because after all, they did defeat the Soviet Union and bring an end to the four decade long Cold War. They
        all appear to have the right pedigree of “blood-experience” for the Nobel Peace Prize!

        So pardon me if I am not tripping all over myself congratulating the “peace prize” winners!

        Read the rest of chapter 2 in full context.




        Postscript Note
        December 11, 2009


        Thank you Mr. President for the everlasting peace which is finally to be had in our new world government. All the
        fabricated crises, as in the Foundation Trilogy, have provided the outstanding pretexts.

        While it is true that none are more hopelessly enslaved in perpetual war than those who are falsely led to believe they do
        so for peace:



                                                                       1984
                                                                  by George Orwell
                                                                           2009
                                                                 from VideoGoogle Website




http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour




        It is also a fact that no empire in the history of mankind has accomplished what is being achieved with these endless
        manufactured crises and the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to solve them.

        The poor Conservative guy voiceover-ing the new EU Council President heralding the good news ahead of the Nobel
        Peace Prize ceremony, apparently either doesn't fathom the meaning of fait accompli, or is too darn used to the free-
        world order to appreciate the desirability of a Boot stamped on the human face in the one-world order - what a slop:



                                                        Global Governance
                                         EU President Admits One-World Government is Here
                                                      NWO - New World Order
                                                                        by TCCTV
                                                                     November 25, 2009
                                                                   from YouTube Website




        These simpleton plebeian minds,

                “unexposed to the exigencies of higher political or military responsibility”, persistently fail to appreciate the
                value of the “considerable political sophistication” that has gone into the calculus of Global Governance.

        Poorly read of history as they are, and weaned on the immediate gratification of the here and the now having pursued
        their 'American Dreams' in deep slumber all of their lives, they naturally fail to recognize the distemper of hegemony when
        it is inchoate and kept brewing under covers:

                “Peace and its duration, like war, is determined by natural laws that in their fundamental principles do not
                vary nor are found wanting.”; dismiss it as 'conspiracy theory' when an odd iconoclast reveals it.

        And subsequently fail to recognize its fait accompli once it becomes unveiled to all and sundry:

                “In this epoch of war upon which the Empire is about to enter, hopes of peace are futile; constitutions and
                kings and gods are without avail, for these are the old, old struggles that govern the growth and dissolution
                of national life.”

        And so, Mr. President Barack Obama, I finally offer you my humble congratulations, even if somewhat belated and for


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]
Why Was President Obama Gifted The Nobel Peace Prize? - The Answer to The Burning Question Du Jour

        which I hope I may be forgiven!

        The story of the Brilliant Construction of World Order during your tenure at least makes for a good children's bedtime
        story, if nothing else.

                                                         Return to The New World Order
                                                       Return to Big Brother Loves You...
                                                    Return to Obama - A "New" Sociopolitical
                                                                      Era?




http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_obama79.htm[12/10/2013 7:14:06 PM]

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:12/17/2013
language:English
pages:7